--- title: "US, Denmark and Greenland sign security pact, Rubio says interest is security not conquest" publication: "MediaBias News" url: "https://mediabias.news/conflict/us-denmark-and-greenland-sign-security-pact-rubio-says-interest-is-security-not" api: "https://mediabias.news/api/v1/stories/us-denmark-and-greenland-sign-security-pact-rubio-says-interest-is-security-not" markdown: "https://mediabias.news/conflict/us-denmark-and-greenland-sign-security-pact-rubio-says-interest-is-security-not.md" audio: "https://mediabias.news/api/audio/us-denmark-and-greenland-sign-security-pact-rubio-says-interest-is-security-not" category: "Conflict & Security" area: "United States" published: "2026-09-29T06:45:39.265Z" source_reported: "2026-09-29T06:07:03.000Z" updated: "2026-09-29T06:45:39.265Z" trust_score: 68 critic_score: 95 hype_score: 15 assessment_type: "coverage-and-source-reporting-analysis" fact_check_status: "not-performed" coverage_measured: "2026-09-29T06:45:13.317831+00:00" --- # US, Denmark and Greenland sign security pact, Rubio says interest is security not conquest *The agreement creates new defence zones, expands a space base and bars non‑NATO/EU investors, but will only take effect after Danish and Greenlandic parliamentary approval.* **Scores for the source reporting** (0-100, assessing the original journalism this article was written from, not this write-up): - Trust 68 of 100, higher is better. Two independent full reports name Rubio and the signed security pact, providing named sources and dates (trust = 68). - Craft 95 of 100, higher is better. The articles explain why the security focus matters, quote Rubio, give dates and next steps (critic = 95). - Hype 15 of 100, lower is better. Headlines are straightforward; the body uses measured language without sensationalism (hype = 15). Scored by MediaBias News; method at https://mediabias.news/methodology. **The short version** - The United States, Denmark and Greenland signed a security agreement on 22 September 2026. - The pact allows new U.S. defence zones in Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig and expands the Pituffik Space Base. - It bars non‑NATO or non‑EU states and investors from gaining significant influence in Greenland’s sensitive sectors. - Marco Rubio said the U.S. interest in Greenland is solely about national security, not territorial conquest. On 22 September 2026 the United States, Denmark and Greenland signed a security agreement in New York. The pact creates new U.S. defence zones in Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig, expands the Pituffik Space Base and permits the establishment of additional missile‑defence systems. It also bars states or investors that are not members of NATO or the EU from gaining significant influence in sectors the agreement describes as “sensitive”. The agreement will become operative only after the Danish and Greenlandic parliaments approve it. In a Fox News interview the U.S. secretary of state said the United States’ interest in Greenland is solely about national security and not about territorial conquest. He added that Washington will monitor foreign investment in critical infrastructure and resource extraction on the island. The statement follows former President Donald Trump’s earlier push to purchase Greenland, which was rejected by both Denmark and Greenland. The new pact replaces that proposal with a security‑focused framework that permits additional U.S. military presence while restricting non‑NATO/EU influence. ## What coverage left out None of the right‑rated digests mention the investment‑scrutiny provisions or the requirement for Danish and Greenlandic parliamentary approval before the agreement takes effect. ## FAQ What did Marco Rubio say about the United States’ interest in Greenland? Rubio told Fox News that the United States’ interest in Greenland is solely about national security and not about territorial conquest, emphasizing a security‑focused motive rather than any annexation intent. What does the security agreement allow the United States to do in Greenland? The pact permits the United States to establish new defence zones in Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig, expand the Pituffik Space Base and potentially deploy a missile‑defence system, while restricting non‑NATO/EU influence in sensitive sectors. What restrictions does the agreement place on foreign investors? The agreement bars states or investors that are not members of NATO or the European Union from gaining significant influence in sectors deemed “sensitive”, such as critical infrastructure and resource extraction, to protect national security. When will the agreement become effective? The pact will take effect only after it receives parliamentary approval in both Denmark and Greenland, as stipulated in the signed document. ## Who covered it Shares of the 6 covering outlets with a published leaning rating: - Left: 17% (1) - Centre: 16% (1) - Right: 67% (4) 3 of 9 covering outlets carried no usable leaning rating and were excluded from those percentages. Coverage measured 2026-09-29T06:45:13.317831+00:00. **Coverage watch:** developing. Checked 1 time; 0 checks found a material change. Most recently checked 2026-09-29T07:00:20.189Z. ## How the sides framed it ### Left - Fakti.bg reported that Rubio said “Before any company invests there, it will have to be checked by us and Denmark”. The outlet highlighted that the agreement will subject foreign investment in critical infrastructure and resource extraction to scrutiny to prevent companies linked to China or other non‑NATO states from gaining control. It also reproduced the text of the pact that bars non‑NATO/EU investors from significant influence in “especially sensitive sectors”. ### Centre - Ekstra Bladet’s full report quoted Rubio stating that the president has made clear the Greenland issue is about national security, not territorial conquest. The article led on the creation of new defence zones in Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig, the expansion of the Pituffik Space Base and the opening for a missile‑defence system called Golden Dome. It also noted the agreement’s restriction on non‑NATO/EU states or investors from gaining influence in sensitive sectors and the pending parliamentary approval in Denmark and Greenland. ### Right - Four right‑rated outlets (news‑pravda.com, Jyllands‑Posten, BT and Berlingske) each ran digests that repeated Rubio’s comment that the United States has never been interested in making Greenland part of the United States and that the interest is about security, not territorial conquest. None of the digests added further detail about investment scrutiny or parliamentary procedures. ## Factuality profile of the covering outlets These are published factuality ratings of the outlets, not a verdict on whether this story or its claims are true. - veryLow: 1 - high: 5 - unknown: 3 ## Verification scope This page compares coverage and scores the source reporting. It is not a ClaimReview verdict on whether the underlying event or claim is true. ## Original reporting this was written from - [news-pravda.com](https://news-pravda.com/world/2026/09/29/2627664.html) — Marco Rubio:. With President Trump, he has made it clear that the issue of Greenland is not about conquest — [it is] about national security - [cphpost.dk](https://cphpost.dk/2026-09-29/global/us-says-greenland-interest-is-about-national-security-not-territorial-conquest) — US says Greenland interest is about national security, not territorial conquest - The Copenhagen Post - [Jyllands-Posten](https://jyllands-posten.dk/international/ECE19686859/rubio-usas-interesse-i-groenland-handler-kun-om-sikkerhed) — Rubio: US Interest in Greenland Is only About Security - [Presse-fotos.dk](https://presse-fotos.dk/usa-med-klar-melding-om-groenland-det-handler-kun-om-sikkerhed) — The United States Has a Clear Message About Greenland: It Is only About Security - [Ekstra Bladet](https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/politik/rubio-usas-interesse-i-groenland-handler-kun-om-sikkerhed/11304011) — Rubio: US Interest in Greenland Is only About Security - [BT](https://bt.dk/udland/rubio-usas-interesse-i-groenland-handler-kun-om-sikkerhed) — Rubio: US Interest in Greenland Is only About Security - [avisendanmark.dk](https://avisendanmark.dk/udland/rubio-usa-s-interesse-i-groenland-handler-kun-om-sikkerhed) — Rubio: US Interest in Greenland Is only About Security - [berlingske.dk](https://berlingske.dk/internationalt/rubio-usas-interesse-i-groenland-handler-kun-om-sikkerhed) — Rubio: US Interest in Greenland Is only About Security - [fakti.bg](https://fakti.bg/world/1084625-rubio-sasht-i-dania-shte-proveravat-investiciite-v-grenlandia) — Rubio: US and Denmark Will Scrutinize Investments in Greenland ## Questions **What did Marco Rubio say about the United States’ interest in Greenland?** Rubio told Fox News that the United States’ interest in Greenland is solely about national security and not about territorial conquest, emphasizing a security‑focused motive rather than any annexation intent. **What does the security agreement allow the United States to do in Greenland?** The pact permits the United States to establish new defence zones in Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig, expand the Pituffik Space Base and potentially deploy a missile‑defence system, while restricting non‑NATO/EU influence in sensitive sectors. **What restrictions does the agreement place on foreign investors?** The agreement bars states or investors that are not members of NATO or the European Union from gaining significant influence in sectors deemed “sensitive”, such as critical infrastructure and resource extraction, to protect national security. **When will the agreement become effective?** The pact will take effect only after it receives parliamentary approval in both Denmark and Greenland, as stipulated in the signed document. --- MediaBias News — https://mediabias.news. Reproduced from https://mediabias.news/conflict/us-denmark-and-greenland-sign-security-pact-rubio-says-interest-is-security-not. Please cite as: MediaBias News, "US, Denmark and Greenland sign security pact, Rubio says interest is security not conquest", https://mediabias.news/conflict/us-denmark-and-greenland-sign-security-pact-rubio-says-interest-is-security-not