Trump working on Belarus potash deal to reduce Canadian reliance
Saskatchewan premier warns of 'blood potash' implications for Canada.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made
Trump working on Belarus potash deal to reduce Canadian reliance
MediaBias News
Photograph: MediaBias News
What this story says
- U.S. President Donald Trump is pursuing a deal to buy potash from Belarus.
- The agreement is intended to reduce American dependence on Canadian fertilizer supplies.
- Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe has voiced concerns, referring to the potential purchase as 'blood potash'.
- The deal's implications for Canada's fertilizer market are a point of contention.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 7 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .
Trust
62/100
Craft
67/100
Hype
15/100
7 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
Only 1 of the 7 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
U.S. President Donald Trump is working to finalise an agreement to purchase potash from Belarus. This initiative is designed to lessen the United States' reliance on fertilizer sourced from Canada. Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe has publicly cautioned against the deal, highlighting potential negative consequences for Canada.
Disagreement on deal details
Reports indicate that some outlets describe the proposed transaction as involving 'blood potash'. This term suggests a connection to human rights concerns or unethical sourcing within Belarus. The specific details of the deal and the extent of its implications for Canada remain subjects of reporting.
Omissions in coverage
None of the left-rated digests mention the specific figure of U.S. President Donald Trump working on a deal to buy potash from Belarus to lessen dependence on Canadian fertilizer. None of the centre-rated digests mention the specific figure of U.S. President Donald Trump working on a deal to buy potash from Belarus to lessen dependence on Canadian fertilizer. None of the right-rated digests mention the specific figure of U.S. President Donald Trump working on a deal to buy potash from Belarus to lessen dependence on Canadian fertilizer.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 22 Sept 2026, 04:30, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
5 rated outlets
- Left-rated reports highlighted U.S. President Donald Trump's efforts to secure a potash deal with Belarus as a means to reduce dependence on Canadian fertilizer. These reports also featured Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe's warnings about the deal, specifically mentioning his use of the term 'blood potash' and his assertion that the eastern European country has 'blood on its hands'. The potential impact on Canada was a central theme.
Centre
1 rated outlet
- Centre-rated reports focused on Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe's reaction to a proposed U.S. potash deal with Belarus. The coverage noted Moe's use of the term 'blood potash' in response to the proposal.
Right
1 rated outlet
- Right-rated reports centred on Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe's warning that 'blood potash' is part of U.S. President Donald Trump's planned deal with Belarus. The coverage stated that the deal is intended to thwart Canada's fertilizer market and reduce dependence on Canadian fertilizer.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Trump working on Belarus potash deal to reduce Canadian reliance?
- Of the 7 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 71% are rated left, 15% are rated centre, 14% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Trump working on Belarus potash deal to reduce Canadian reliance left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 7 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of Trump working on Belarus potash deal to reduce Canadian reliance biased?
- Trump working on Belarus potash deal to reduce Canadian reliance is one event reported by 7 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Trump working on Belarus potash deal to reduce Canadian reliance?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Trump working on Belarus potash deal to reduce Canadian reliance?
- 7 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What is the proposed deal between the U.S. and Belarus?
- U.S. President Donald Trump is reportedly negotiating a deal to purchase potash from Belarus. The primary aim of this agreement is to reduce American reliance on fertilizer sourced from Canada.
- What concerns has Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe raised?
- Premier Scott Moe has warned that the proposed deal could harm Canada. He has referred to the Belarusian potash as 'blood potash', suggesting concerns related to human rights or unethical sourcing in Belarus.
- What is the main goal of the U.S. potash deal?
- The main objective of the proposed deal is to decrease the United States' dependence on Canadian fertilizer. This strategic shift aims to secure alternative sources for essential agricultural inputs.
Read it at the source
7 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
5- Moe warns 'blood potash' part of Trump's planned deal with Belarus to… (opens nationalnewswatch.com in a new tab)
nationalnewswatch.com — is nationalnewswatch.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Security Check (opens The Hamilton Spectator in a new tab)
The Hamilton Spectator — is The Hamilton Spectator biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Moe warns 'blood potash' part of Trump's planned deal with Belarus to thwart Canada (opens The Lethbridge Herald in a new tab)
The Lethbridge Herald — is The Lethbridge Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Moe warns 'blood potash' part of Trump's planned deal with Belarus to thwart Canada (opens SooToday.com in a new tab)
SooToday.com — is SooToday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump says U.S. hammering out potash deal with Belarus in bid to sideline Canada (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
1Right
1Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
More in Business & Economy
All Business & Economy →Elsewhere on the site
Politics•3 min readTrump plans 'AI Force' modeled on Space Force
Politics•2 min readDiesel Prices Hit Record High, Senator Urges Export Ban

