Skip to the story
All stories

US Justice Department denies pausing cooperation with Canada

Reports indicated a directive to halt antitrust work, but the department stated no such instruction was given.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
A file photo of the Department of Justice building in Washington, DC, US, February 20, 2026. (Photo: REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File)

What this story says

  • The US Justice Department's antitrust division was reportedly instructed to pause cooperation with the Canadian government.
  • The department has denied issuing any such directive, stating the alleged pause instruction was never given.
  • The reported pause occurred amidst a trade dispute that has led to tariffs on billions of dollars in cross-border trade.
  • The Wall Street Journal initially reported the alleged instruction, citing emails.

Who covered it

Left 10%(1)Centre 50%(5)Right 40%(4)

Percentages are shares of the 10 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .

Trust

78/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

18/100

10 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 1 of the 10 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Reports emerged on 4 September 2026 that the US Justice Department's antitrust division had been instructed to pause all cooperation with the Canadian government. The directive was reportedly sent via email by Lynda Marshall, chief of the antitrust division's international section, amid an escalating trade dispute between the two nations. This dispute has resulted in tariffs on tens of billions of dollars in cross-border trade.

Disagreement on the directive

The US Justice Department has denied the reports. In a statement to Reuters, the department said the "alleged direction was never given to anyone." The department also stated that a scheduled meeting was temporarily held off for preparation, rather than a complete halt in cooperation. The Wall Street Journal, which first reported the alleged instruction, cited emails as its source.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated, centre-rated, or right-rated digests mention the specific date of the alleged email directive from Lynda Marshall, only that it occurred earlier in the week of the reports.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 5 Sept 2026, 04:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

1 rated outlet

  • Raw Story reported that the Justice Department accidentally stopped working with Canada due to a division chief misunderstanding instructions to reschedule a meeting. The outlet stated the email had the subject line "Pause on Canada" and that Lynda Marshall, chief of the antitrust division's international section, sent it.

Centre

5 rated outlets

  • Channel News Asia, Devdiscourse, Market Screener, and Reuters all reported that the US Justice Department's antitrust division was instructed to pause all work with the Canadian government, citing The Wall Street Journal. Channel News Asia and Reuters noted that the directive came amid a trade dispute between Washington and Ottawa. Channel News Asia also reported the Justice Department's denial, stating the "alleged direction was never given to anyone." The department explained that a scheduled meeting was temporarily held off for preparation. The White House referred Reuters to the DOJ, and the Canadian government did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Right

4 rated outlets

  • Times of India, wfmd.com, Fox News, and Daily Sabah reported that the US Justice Department's antitrust division was directed to pause all cooperation with Canada. Times of India stated the department denied reports of pausing work with Canada and that a scheduled meeting was temporarily held for preparation. Wfmd.com and Fox News reported the directive came amid escalating US-Canada trade tensions. Daily Sabah reported the halt amid a trade dispute.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover US Justice Department denies pausing cooperation with Canada?
Of the 10 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 10% are rated left, 50% are rated centre, 40% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is US Justice Department denies pausing cooperation with Canada left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 10 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of US Justice Department denies pausing cooperation with Canada biased?
US Justice Department denies pausing cooperation with Canada is one event reported by 10 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting US Justice Department denies pausing cooperation with Canada?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered US Justice Department denies pausing cooperation with Canada?
10 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What was the US Justice Department accused of doing?
Reports indicated that the US Justice Department's antitrust division was instructed via email to pause all cooperation with the Canadian government. This alleged directive came amid ongoing trade disputes and tariffs between the two nations.
Did the US Justice Department pause cooperation with Canada?
The US Justice Department has denied the reports, stating that the alleged pause directive was never given to anyone. The department clarified that a scheduled meeting was temporarily held off for preparation.
What is the context of the alleged pause?
The alleged pause in cooperation occurred amid a trade dispute between the United States and Canada. This dispute has led to tariffs being imposed on tens of billions of dollars in cross-border trade between the two neighbouring countries.

Read it at the source

10 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

1

Centre

5

Right

4

Not rated

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

US Justice Dept Denies Canada Cooperation Pause | MediaBias News