Lawyer seeks competence ruling for USS Cole bombing suspect
Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri faces trial for 2000 attack, with his lawyer citing brain injury from CIA custody.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Two young boys from Inkster are back home safe after an all-day search ended with the discovery of their father’s body in a cornfield in Norwalk, Ohio. The case has since been closed and ruled a suicide.
Photograph: Click on Detroit (embedded from source)
What this story says
- A trial for Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, accused of organising the 2000 USS Cole bombing, is scheduled to begin on October 26.
- Nashiri's lawyer has requested a military court determine his client's competence to stand trial, citing a traumatic brain injury.
- The defence lawyer states the injury resulted from torture, including waterboarding, during Nashiri's detention in CIA custody.
- A psychiatrist for the defence concluded Nashiri is not competent to understand proceedings or assist his legal team.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 13 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .
Trust
60/100
Craft
65/100
Hype
20/100
13 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
Only 1 of the 13 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
A lawyer for Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, suspected of organising the 2000 attack on the USS Cole, has asked a military court to determine his client's competence before the trial begins. The lawyer argues Nashiri has a traumatic brain injury resulting from torture in CIA custody. The attack killed 17 U.S. sailors when a boat exploded next to the USS Cole destroyer off Yemen. Nashiri, who faces a potential death penalty, was captured in 2002 and held in CIA custody where he underwent waterboarding and beatings.
Disagreement on trial start date
Click on Detroit reported that the trial was rescheduled to start on October 26. Bangor Daily News also stated the trial was scheduled to start this month. However, the Associated Press News digest stated a trial is set for the suspected organiser of a deadly al-Qaida attack on a U.S. warship in the year 2000, without specifying a date.
What the coverage left out
None of the left-rated digests mention the specific date of October 26 for the trial start. None of the right-rated digests mention the specific details of Nashiri's alleged torture, including waterboarding and beatings, or the defence psychiatrist's conclusion on his competence.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 15 Oct 2026, 22:30, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
6 rated outlets
- Left-rated reports led on the lawyer's argument that Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri has a traumatic brain injury from torture in CIA custody. The Seattle Times, The Hamilton Spectator, Independent, Associated Press News, The Independent (US), and Bangor Daily News all highlighted this point. Several of these digests also mentioned Nashiri's capture in 2002 and his treatment, including waterboarding and beatings, while in CIA custody. The Associated Press News digest noted that a trial is set for the suspected organiser of a deadly al-Qaida attack on a U.S. warship in the year 2000.
Centre
6 rated outlets
- Centre-rated reports from Click on Detroit, WBAL, Winnipeg Free Press, LancasterOnline, Daily News-Record, and WPLG focused on the lawyer's request for a military court to determine Nashiri's competence before trial. These reports stated that the lawyer argues Nashiri has a traumatic brain injury "arising from torture in CIA custody." Click on Detroit and WPLG provided the most detail, noting Nashiri's capture in 2002, his treatment including waterboarding and confinement, and the potential five-week duration of the proceedings at a U.S. Navy base in Cuba. Click on Detroit also reported the trial was rescheduled to October 26.
Right
1 rated outlet
- The right-rated digest from MY Northwest stated that a lawyer for the suspected organiser of a deadly al-Qaida attack on a U.S. warship in the year 2000 wants a military court to determine his competence before trial.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Lawyer seeks competence ruling for USS Cole bombing suspect?
- Of the 13 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 46% are rated left, 46% are rated centre, 8% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Lawyer seeks competence ruling for USS Cole bombing suspect left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 13 rated outlets on this story, 46% are rated left, 46% are rated centre, 8% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Lawyer seeks competence ruling for USS Cole bombing suspect biased?
- Lawyer seeks competence ruling for USS Cole bombing suspect is one event reported by 13 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Lawyer seeks competence ruling for USS Cole bombing suspect?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Lawyer seeks competence ruling for USS Cole bombing suspect?
- 13 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- Who is Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri?
- Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri is suspected of organising the 2000 attack on the USS Cole, which killed 17 U.S. sailors. He was captured in 2002 and has been held in CIA custody, where he reportedly underwent waterboarding and beatings.
- Why is his lawyer questioning his competence?
- Nashiri's lawyer argues he has a traumatic brain injury resulting from torture in CIA custody. A defence psychiatrist concluded that Nashiri is not competent to understand the trial proceedings or assist his legal counsel.
- When is the trial scheduled to begin?
- The trial for Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri was rescheduled to begin on October 26. However, some reports indicated the trial was set to start this month without specifying a precise date.
Read it at the source
13 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
6- Lawyer questions al-Qaida suspect’s competence before USS Cole bombing trial (opens The Seattle Times in a new tab)
The Seattle Times — is The Seattle Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Lawyer questions al-Qaida suspect’s competence before USS Cole bombing trial (opens The Hamilton Spectator in a new tab)
The Hamilton Spectator — is The Hamilton Spectator biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Lawyer questions al-Qaida suspect's competence before USS Cole bombing trial (opens The Independent (US) in a new tab)
The Independent (US) — is The Independent (US) biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Lawyer questions al-Qaida suspect's competence before USS Cole bombing trial (opens Associated Press News in a new tab)
Associated Press News — is Associated Press News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Lawyer questions al-Qaida suspect's competence before USS Cole bombing trial (opens The Independent in a new tab)
The Independent — is The Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Lawyer questions al-Qaida suspect's competence before USS Cole bombing trial (opens Bangor Daily News in a new tab)
Bangor Daily News — is Bangor Daily News biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
6- Lawyer questions al-Qaida suspect's competence before USS Cole bo (opens WBAL in a new tab)
- Lawyer questions al-Qaida suspect's competence before USS Cole bombing trial (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Lawyer questions al-Qaida suspect's competence before USS Cole bombing trial (opens Daily News-Record in a new tab)
Daily News-Record — is Daily News-Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Lawyer questions al-Qaida suspect's competence before USS Cole bombing trial (opens LancasterOnline in a new tab)
LancasterOnline — is LancasterOnline biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Lawyer questions al-Qaida suspect's competence before USS Cole bombing trial (opens Click on Detroit in a new tab)
Click on Detroit — is Click on Detroit biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Lawyer questions al-Qaida suspect's competence before USS Cole bombing trial (opens WPLG in a new tab)
Right
1Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

