Marc-Aurèle Chabot, charged in Quebec extremist plot, no longer in Canadian Armed Forces
Department of National Defence confirms release of corporal accused of facilitating terrorist activity but gives no details
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Marc-Aurèle Chabot's release is protected under the Privacy Act, a Department of National Defence spokesperson says. (CBC)
Photograph: CBC News (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Marc-Aurèle Chabot, a former corporal in the Canadian Armed Forces, was charged in July 2025 with facilitating terrorist activity linked to an anti-government extremist plot in Quebec.
- The Department of National Defence confirmed Chabot is no longer a member of the military but declined to provide details, citing the Privacy Act.
- A fourth suspect, also facing charges, remains in the Canadian Armed Forces but is not performing military duties.
- None of the allegations against Chabot, including illegal firearms storage and possession of explosives, have been proven in court.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 28 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 2 of the 30 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
74/100
Craft
58/100
Hype
20/100
30 sources · methodology
Missing from the right
Only 2 of the 28 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.
Marc-Aurèle Chabot, a former corporal in the Canadian Armed Forces, is no longer a member of the military. Chabot was charged in July 2025 alongside two other Quebec men with participating in an anti-government extremist plot in the Quebec City area. The RCMP alleged the group planned to create an anti-government militia and took concrete steps to facilitate terrorist activity.
Department of National Defence spokesperson Cheryl Forrest confirmed Chabot’s release but declined to provide further details, citing the Privacy Act. Forrest also stated that a fourth suspect, who faces weapons charges, remains a member of the Canadian Armed Forces but is not performing military duties. Chabot was stationed at Canadian Forces Base Valcartier near Quebec City when he was charged.
The charges against Chabot include illegal storage of firearms and possession of explosives and prohibited devices. None of the allegations have been proven in court.
What the coverage left out
None of the right-rated digests mentioned the fourth suspect, who remains in the Canadian Armed Forces but is not performing military duties. The two right-rated digests also did not include the Department of National Defence’s refusal to provide details under the Privacy Act.
Coverage settled. We checked this 136 times and stopped on 11 Aug 2026, 14:00. The figures above are what it finished at.
How other outlets pictured it
Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Quebec man charged with facilitating terrorist activity is no longer a member of the Canadian Armed Forces. A Canadian soldier takes part in an announcement regarding the arrival of new ambulance variants to the armoured combat support vehicle fleet at Garrison Petawawa in Petawawa, Ont., on Thursday, Oct. 19, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick
CTV News — embedded from source
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
17 rated outlets
- All 13 left-rated digests led on the fact that Chabot is no longer a member of the Canadian Armed Forces. The two full reports, from CBC News and Radio-Canada, included the RCMP’s allegation that the accused planned to create an anti-government militia. CBC News also noted Chabot’s rank and the base where he served, and quoted the Department of National Defence’s refusal to provide details under the Privacy Act.
Centre
9 rated outlets
- The eight centre-rated digests all carried the core fact that Chabot is no longer in the military. Four of the digests, from Battlefords NOW, meadowlakeNOW, Medicine Hat News and Ckpg Today, included the Department of National Defence’s refusal to provide details under the Privacy Act. CTV News, the only centre-rated full report, repeated the RCMP’s allegation that the accused took concrete steps to facilitate terrorist activity and noted the fourth suspect remains in the forces but off duty.
Right
2 rated outlets
- The two right-rated digests, from The Epoch Times and The Straits Times, both reported that Chabot is no longer a member of the Canadian Armed Forces. The Straits Times’ digest included the RCMP’s description of Chabot’s actions as “concrete actions to facilitate terrorist activity.” Neither digest mentioned the Privacy Act or the fourth suspect.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Marc-Aurèle Chabot, charged in Quebec extremist plot, no longer in…?
- Of the 28 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 61% are rated left, 32% are rated centre, 7% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 30. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Marc-Aurèle Chabot, charged in Quebec extremist plot, no longer in… left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 28 rated outlets on this story, 61% are rated left, 32% are rated centre, 7% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Marc-Aurèle Chabot, charged in Quebec extremist plot, no longer in… biased?
- Marc-Aurèle Chabot, charged in Quebec extremist plot, no longer in Canadian Armed Forces is one event reported by 30 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Marc-Aurèle Chabot, charged in Quebec extremist plot, no longer in…?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Marc-Aurèle Chabot, charged in Quebec extremist plot, no longer in…?
- 30 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What is Marc-Aurèle Chabot accused of?
- Chabot is accused of facilitating terrorist activity linked to an anti-government extremist plot in Quebec. The RCMP alleged he and two others planned to create an anti-government militia and took concrete steps to carry out the plot. The charges include illegal storage of firearms and possession of explosives.
- Is Marc-Aurèle Chabot still in the Canadian Armed Forces?
- No. The Department of National Defence confirmed Chabot is no longer a member of the military but declined to provide details, citing the Privacy Act. He was a corporal stationed at Canadian Forces Base Valcartier when charged in July 2025.
- Are any of the accused still in the military?
- Yes. A fourth suspect, who faces weapons charges, remains a member of the Canadian Armed Forces but is not performing military duties. The other three accused, including Chabot, are no longer in the military.
- Have the allegations against Chabot been proven in court?
- No. None of the allegations against Chabot, including illegal firearms storage and possession of explosives, have been proven in court. The case is ongoing.
Read it at the source
30 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
17- Accused in a Case of Terrorism, Excluded From the Army (opens Radio-Canada in a new tab)
Radio-Canada — is Radio-Canada biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens CBC News in a new tab)
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens Elora Fergus Today in a new tab)
Elora Fergus Today — is Elora Fergus Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens haltonhillstoday.ca in a new tab)
haltonhillstoday.ca — is haltonhillstoday.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens InnisfilToday.ca in a new tab)
InnisfilToday.ca — is InnisfilToday.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens Newmarket Today in a new tab)
Newmarket Today — is Newmarket Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens burlingtontoday.com in a new tab)
burlingtontoday.com — is burlingtontoday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens Oakville News in a new tab)
Oakville News — is Oakville News biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 9 more
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens StratfordToday.ca in a new tab)
StratfordToday.ca — is StratfordToday.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens CambridgeToday.ca in a new tab)
CambridgeToday.ca — is CambridgeToday.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens Bay Today in a new tab)
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens Sudbury in a new tab)
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens Orillia Matters in a new tab)
Orillia Matters — is Orillia Matters biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens SooToday.com in a new tab)
SooToday.com — is SooToday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- A Quebecer Accused in a Case of Terrorism Is No Longer a Member of the Armed Forces (opens La Presse in a new tab)
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens The Hamilton Spectator in a new tab)
The Hamilton Spectator — is The Hamilton Spectator biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
9- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens CP24 in a new tab)
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens CTV News in a new tab)
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens Ckpg Today in a new tab)
Ckpg Today — is Ckpg Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens Medicine Hat News in a new tab)
Medicine Hat News — is Medicine Hat News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens meadowlakeNOW in a new tab)
meadowlakeNOW — is meadowlakeNOW biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens Battlefords NOW in a new tab)
Battlefords NOW — is Battlefords NOW biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens City News in a new tab)
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
2- Canadian Armed Forces Member Charged in Terrorist Case No Longer in the Military (opens The Epoch Times in a new tab)
The Epoch Times — is The Epoch Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian military says soldier charged with terrorism offenses is no longer serving (opens The Straits Times in a new tab)
The Straits Times — is The Straits Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
2- Armed Forces Administration Allowance: Up to 500 Euros per Month - The Procedures for Granting It (opens CNN Greece in a new tab)
CNN Greece — is CNN Greece biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Canadian Armed Forces member charged in terrorist case no longer in the military (opens Loonie Politics in a new tab)
Loonie Politics — is Loonie Politics biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
