Skip to the story
All stories

Russia demands Japan remove US missile systems

Moscow sent a protest note over the deployment of Typhon systems capable of launching SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Доставка американского комплекса РСМД Typhon. Фото: US Army

What this story says

  • Russia has formally demanded that Japan remove US-made Typhon missile systems from its territory.
  • Moscow views the deployment of the Typhon system, capable of launching SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles, as a threat to its security.
  • Russia sent a protest note to Japan on September 3 regarding the deployment.
  • China has also expressed concern over the deployment and sent a similar note to Japan.

Who covered it

Left 46%(11)Centre 16%(4)Right 38%(9)

Percentages are shares of the 24 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 41 of the 65 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

45/100

Hype

20/100

65 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 11 of the 24 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

Russia has demanded that Japan remove US-made Typhon missile systems from its territory. The Russian Foreign Ministry stated that Moscow views the deployment as a threat to its security. The Typhon system is capable of launching SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles.

Moscow sent a protest note to Japan on September 3 regarding the deployment. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova stated that Japan should take the note "with the utmost seriousness." China has also expressed concern over the deployment and sent a similar note to Japan.

Disagreement on location

Reports differ on the specific location of the Typhon missile systems in Japan. EADaily, topwar.ru, vz.ru, Interfax.ru, and Apa state the systems were deployed on Kyushu Island. However, fakti.bg and other reports do not specify a location.

What the coverage left out

None of the centre-rated outlets covered this story. None of the right-rated reports mentioned the context of President Putin's visit to the Kuril Islands, which was included in the left-rated report.

Coverage settled. We checked this 10 times and stopped on 24 Sept 2026, 00:30. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

11 rated outlets

  • Fakti.bg, The Independent, Associated Press News, abc News, The Hamilton Spectator, The Record, and The Independent (US) all reported Russia's demand that Japan remove US missile systems.
  • Fakti.bg stated Russia's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova announced the demand. This outlet also detailed that the "Typhoon" system can fire SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles.
  • The reports noted Russia views the deployment as a threat to its security. Fakti.bg mentioned a protest note sent on 3 September, which it said Japan must take seriously.

Centre

4 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated outlets reported that Russia formally protested Japan's decision to host US-made medium-range missile systems. These reports stated Russia views the deployment as a threat to its security.
  • The digests mentioned Russia's Foreign Ministry lodged the protest. One report noted the protest was issued earlier this month and warned Tokyo about the deployment.
  • One centre-rated digest stated Russia also demands Japan recognise World War II results and halt its remilitarisation. This report did not name the specific missile system.

Right

9 rated outlets

  • The five right-rated reports all led with Russia's demand for Japan to remove the US Typhon missile systems. EADaily reported that both Russia and China demanded Japan remove the systems, stating that Moscow and Beijing had sent notes to Japan. It noted the protest note was handed to Japanese diplomats on September 3 and that Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Andrei Rudenko had urged the Japanese ambassador to take the note seriously. EADaily also stated that China had sent a similar note expressing concern over Japan's "remilitarisation" and the appearance of the Typhon systems. Topwar.ru and vz.ru reported that the Russian Foreign Ministry demanded the removal of the systems deployed on Kyushu Island. Interfax.ru stated that Russia sent a protest note on September 3 regarding the deployment on Kyushu Island and that the note emphasised Tokyo's action despite previous warnings. News-pravda.com reported that Maria Zakharova said Russia demanded the removal of the American Typhon complexes from its territory.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Russia demands Japan remove US missile systems?
Of the 24 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 46% are rated left, 16% are rated centre, 38% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 65. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Russia demands Japan remove US missile systems left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 24 rated outlets on this story, 46% are rated left, 16% are rated centre, 38% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Russia demands Japan remove US missile systems biased?
Russia demands Japan remove US missile systems is one event reported by 65 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Russia demands Japan remove US missile systems?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Russia demands Japan remove US missile systems?
65 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What has Russia demanded of Japan?
Russia has demanded that Japan remove US-made Typhon missile systems from its territory. Moscow views the deployment of these systems, which are capable of launching SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles, as a threat to its security.
When did Russia send its protest note?
Russia sent a protest note to Japan on September 3 regarding the deployment of the Typhon missile systems. The Russian Foreign Ministry has urged Japan to treat this note with the utmost seriousness.
Has any other country expressed concern?
Yes, China has also expressed concern over the deployment of the Typhon missile systems in Japan and has sent a similar protest note to Tokyo. This indicates a broader regional concern regarding the military installations.

Read it at the source

65 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

11
Show 3 more

Centre

4

Right

9
Show 1 more

Not rated

41
Show 33 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Russia protests US missiles in Japan | MediaBias News