Settlers divert Fasayil spring to fill West Bank pool, cutting off Palestinian farms
The seizure left crops unplanted and homes without water in the Jordan Valley village, as settlers advertised the pool for tourists
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made
:strip_icc()/i.s3.glbimg.com/v1/AUTH_63b422c2caee4269b8b34177e8876b93/internal_photos/bs/2026/t/g/7tPthDRoAGosMNBZ3TEQ/2026-08-14t060048z-973015352-rc29sma9ski3-rtrmadp-3-israel-palestinians-west-bank-springs.jpg)
Settlers divert Fasayil spring to fill West Bank pool, cutting off Palestinian farms
Photograph: Globo (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Israeli settlers diverted water from a Palestinian spring in Fasayil to fill a pool, cutting off irrigation for local farms and domestic supply.
- The spring had served the village for generations, and its seizure left crops unplanted and families without water.
- Settlers advertised the pool as a tourist attraction and received financial support from Israel’s finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich.
- UN data shows settlers have seized control of at least 160 water and sanitation sites in the West Bank in 2026, displacing communities.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 12 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .
Trust
78/100
Craft
75/100
Hype
15/100
12 sources · methodology
Thin on the left so far
Only 2 of the 12 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Israeli settlers diverted water from a spring in the West Bank village of Fasayil to fill a pool at an archaeological site. The spring had supplied water to Palestinian farms and homes in the Jordan Valley for generations. After the diversion, settlers advertised the pool as a tourist attraction and received financial support from Israel’s finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich.
The seizure left crops unplanted and families without water. Saad Nemer, a farmer in Fasayil, said his irrigation pipeline was cut off in June. His fields, which normally grow eggplant, zucchini and watermelons, lay fallow. Nemer presented documents showing his family’s ownership of the land, including the spring and the pool, dating to 1957. COGAT, the Israeli military agency that oversees civilian policy in the occupied territories, did not respond to requests for comment.
Settlers have seized control of at least 160 water and sanitation sites in the West Bank in 2026, according to UN data. In the northern Jordan Valley, settlers now control 95% of springs, displacing Palestinian communities. Adel Yassin, an official with the Palestinian Authority’s water authority, called the seizures a "water war" designed to force Palestinians off their land.
What the coverage left out
None of the right-rated digests mentioned the financial support pledged by Israel’s finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, for the development of the pool. None of the centre-rated digests mentioned the settler’s claim that the pool belonged to King Herod, as reported by Breaking News. Only Breaking News, the left-rated full report, included the detail that settlers had beaten a Palestinian employee and threatened Saad Nemer for approaching the spring.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 14 Aug 2026, 14:31, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
2 rated outlets
- The two left-rated reports led on the impact of the water diversion on Palestinian farmers and communities. Breaking News quoted Saad Nemer, the farmer whose irrigation pipeline was cut off, and described his fields as "scorched" and unplanted. It also quoted Adel Yassin, who called the seizures a "water war" aimed at making Palestinian life in the West Bank "unsustainable".
- Breaking News reported that settlers had advertised the pool as a tourist attraction and that Israel’s finance minister had pledged financial support for its development. It included a quote from Yishai Shreiber, a settler who said Palestinians would not dare approach the site after seeing "large groups of Jews" using it. The report also noted that the UN and most governments consider Israeli settlements illegal under international law.
Centre
3 rated outlets
- The three centre-rated digests led on the seizure of the spring and its conversion into a recreational pool. France24’s digest said settlers had taken control of a freshwater spring that Palestinian farmers had relied on for generations, leaving crops to wither. It also reported that settlers had seized 95% of springs in the northern Jordan Valley, pushing Palestinian communities off their land.
- WTVB and Reuters, both centre-rated, carried digests that described the pool as created by siphoning off water that had irrigated Palestinian crops. None of the centre-rated digests mentioned the financial support pledged by Israel’s finance minister or the settler’s claim that the pool belonged to King Herod.
Right
7 rated outlets
- The seven right-rated digests led on the diversion of water from Palestinian farms to fill the pool. Globo’s digest described settlers refreshing themselves in the pool on a "hot summer day", while Cyprus Mail and Asharq AL-awsat’s digests noted that the spring had served as a lifeline for the village of Fasayil. Daily Sabah’s digest said settlers had cut off the water supply to Palestinian farmland to set up the pool.
- Free Malaysia Today’s digest said the spring had long supported the village of Fasayil before its pipeline was seized. The Hindu Business Line and Straits Times’ digests described the broader pattern of settlers seizing Palestinian freshwater springs and drying up farmlands. None of the right-rated digests mentioned the financial support from Israel’s finance minister or the settler’s claim about King Herod.
Read it at the source
12 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
2- Israeli settlers divert Palestinian water to fill West Bank pool (opens Breaking News in a new tab)
Breaking News — is Breaking News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- The Palestinian freshwater springs being seized by Israeli settlers (opens Al-Monitor in a new tab)
Al-Monitor — is Al-Monitor biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
3- Israeli settlers seize Palestinian water source in occupied West Bank to create recreational pool (opens France24 in a new tab)
- The Palestinian freshwater springs being seized by Israeli settlers (opens WTVB in a new tab)
- Israeli settlers divert Palestinian water to fill West Bank pool (opens Reuters in a new tab)
Right
7- Israeli Colonists Divert Palestinian Water to Fill the West Bank's Pool (opens Globo in a new tab)
- Israeli settlers divert Palestinian water to fill West Bank pool (opens Cyprus Mail in a new tab)
Cyprus Mail — is Cyprus Mail biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Israeli Settlers Divert Palestinian Water to Fill West Bank Pool (opens Asharq AL-awsat in a new tab)
Asharq AL-awsat — is Asharq AL-awsat biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Israeli settlers cut Palestinian water supply, set up swimming pool (opens Daily Sabah in a new tab)
Daily Sabah — is Daily Sabah biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Israeli settlers divert Palestinian water to fill West Bank pool (opens Free Malaysia Today News in a new tab)
Free Malaysia Today News — is Free Malaysia Today News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Israeli settlers seize Palestinian freshwater springs, dry up farmlands (opens The Hindu Business Line in a new tab)
The Hindu Business Line — is The Hindu Business Line biased? Our profile of this outlet
- The Palestinian freshwater springs being seized by Israeli settlers (opens The Straits Times in a new tab)
The Straits Times — is The Straits Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Settlers divert Fasayil spring to fill West Bank pool, cutting off…?
- Of the 12 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 17% are rated left, 25% are rated centre, 58% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Settlers divert Fasayil spring to fill West Bank pool, cutting off… left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 12 rated outlets on this story, 17% are rated left, 25% are rated centre, 58% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Settlers divert Fasayil spring to fill West Bank pool, cutting off… biased?
- Settlers divert Fasayil spring to fill West Bank pool, cutting off Palestinian farms is one event reported by 12 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Settlers divert Fasayil spring to fill West Bank pool, cutting off…?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Settlers divert Fasayil spring to fill West Bank pool, cutting off…?
- 12 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What happened to the water supply in Fasayil?
- Israeli settlers diverted water from a spring in Fasayil to fill a pool, cutting off irrigation for farms and domestic supply. The spring had served the village for generations, and its seizure left crops unplanted and families without water.
- How many water sites have settlers seized in the West Bank in 2026?
- UN data shows Israeli settlers have seized control of at least 160 water and sanitation sites in the West Bank in 2026. In the northern Jordan Valley, settlers now control 95% of springs, displacing Palestinian communities.
- Did Israel’s government respond to the water diversion in Fasayil?
- COGAT, the Israeli military agency overseeing civilian policy in the occupied territories, and Israel’s finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, did not respond to requests for comment on the water diversion in Fasayil.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
