South Korea says North Korean mines caused DMZ blast

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover South Korea says North Korean mines caused DMZ blast?

Of the 65 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 26% are rated left, 45% are rated centre, 29% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 112. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.

Is South Korea says North Korean mines caused DMZ blast left or right?

Neither side dominates it. Of the 65 rated outlets on this story, 26% are rated left, 45% are rated centre, 29% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.

Is the coverage of South Korea says North Korean mines caused DMZ blast biased?

South Korea says North Korean mines caused DMZ blast is one event reported by 112 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.

Which side is not reporting South Korea says North Korean mines caused DMZ blast?

When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.

Which outlets covered South Korea says North Korean mines caused DMZ blast?

112 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.

What happened in the Demilitarised Zone?

South Korea's Defence Minister Kang Shin-chul stated that North Korean mines caused a blast in the Demilitarised Zone (DMZ) that injured South Korean personnel. An unexploded North Korean plastic anti-personnel mine was discovered near the blast site, and one soldier lost a foot.

How did South Korea respond to the incident?

South Korea's Defence Minister Kang Shin-chul described the incident as a violation of the Korean War armistice agreement and stated that Seoul would take corresponding measures. The military indicated it has a range of measures at its disposal and would implement them in stages.

Were the mines believed to have drifted into the area?

South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff stated that the mines did not appear to have drifted and were found south of the Military Demarcation Line. The United Nations Command assessed they were found clearly south of the MDL.