Uganda and Burundi officials discuss Gaza troop deployment with Israel
African nations considered for international security force envisioned by Donald Trump's Board of Peace
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Uganda and Burundi officials discuss Gaza troop deployment with Israel
Photograph: My Mother Lode (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Military officials from Uganda and Burundi met with Israeli officials last week to discuss troop deployment to Gaza.
- The proposed deployment is part of an international security force envisioned by U.S. President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace.
- Uganda has committed approximately 1,200 personnel to the force, with its parliament having approved the contribution.
- Indonesia had previously indicated a commitment of 8,000 troops but paused its plans following U.S. and Israeli actions against Iran.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 15 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 16 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
60/100
Craft
60/100
Hype
20/100
16 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
Only 3 of the 15 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Military officials from Uganda and Burundi visited Israel last week to discuss deploying troops to Gaza. This potential deployment is part of an international security force planned by U.S. President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace, intended to support a fragile ceasefire. A Board of Peace official told the Associated Press that Uganda is finalising its participation after parliamentary approval, committing around 1,200 personnel. Discussions with Burundi are ongoing, with Burundian officials expressing interest in joining the initiative.
The international force, envisioned to be led by U.S. Maj. Gen. Jasper Jeffers, aims to monitor the ceasefire, train Palestinian police, and secure aid delivery. Progress on the force has been slow, with committed troops falling short of the 20,000-strong goal. Other nations, including Morocco, Kosovo, Kazakhstan, and Albania, have made commitments, contributing a combined total of around 80 personnel, while Morocco has committed up to 500. Uganda's commitment of 1,200 personnel is the second largest after Indonesia's previously stated intention to send 8,000 troops, a plan that was put on hold after the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran.
Disagreements on details
While the Associated Press, My Mother Lode, The Toronto Star, The Seattle Times, The Independent, The Independent (US), Oskaloosa Herald, Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer, Madison Courier, The Hamilton Spectator, and Winnipeg Free Press all report that military officials from Uganda and Burundi visited Israel to discuss troop deployment, the specific details of Burundi's commitment and the overall status of the force vary. My Mother Lode and Associated Press News report that nothing has been finalized with Burundi, but a Burundian military official indicated intent to join. The digests from India Today, Oskaloosa Herald, Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer, and Madison Courier mention that Uganda's participation details are being finalised, but do not specify parliamentary approval.
What the coverage left out
None of the right-rated digests mention the specific figure of 1,200 personnel committed by Uganda, nor do they detail Uganda's parliamentary approval for the troop contribution. The digests from the right also do not mention the analysis provided by Paul D. Williams regarding Uganda and Burundi's peacekeeping experience in Somalia or potential financial motivations for deploying troops.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 7 times, most recently on 24 Aug 2026, 08:00, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
9 rated outlets
- Left-rated reports from Associated Press News, The Toronto Star, The Seattle Times, The Independent, The Independent (US), Oskaloosa Herald, and The Hamilton Spectator highlighted the visit of military officials from Uganda and Burundi to Israel to discuss troop deployment to Gaza. These reports focused on the proposed international security force envisioned by U.S. President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace. They noted Uganda's commitment of around 1,200 personnel and the ongoing discussions with Burundi. The reports also mentioned Indonesia's previously stated intention to send 8,000 troops, which was put on hold after the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran. The Associated Press and My Mother Lode full reports included expert commentary from Paul D. Williams, who suggested that Uganda and Burundi might seek financial and material support for their militaries through such deployments, given their peacekeeping experience in Somalia.
Centre
3 rated outlets
- Centre-rated reports from My Mother Lode, The Record, and Winnipeg Free Press focused on the visit of military officials from Uganda and Burundi to Israel to discuss troop deployment to Gaza. These reports detailed the proposed international security force under U.S. President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace. They specified Uganda's commitment of approximately 1,200 personnel, noting parliamentary approval, and indicated that discussions with Burundi were ongoing. The reports also mentioned other countries that had made commitments to the force and Indonesia's paused troop contribution. The full report from My Mother Lode included analysis on Uganda and Burundi's peacekeeping experience in Somalia and potential motivations for joining the force.
Right
3 rated outlets
- Right-rated reports from India Today, Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer, and Madison Courier highlighted the discussions between Uganda and Burundi military officials and Israel regarding troop deployment to Gaza. These reports noted the proposed international force, linked to Donald Trump's Board of Peace. They mentioned Uganda's commitment of personnel and the ongoing talks with Burundi. The India Today digest framed the move as continuing efforts to shore up the ceasefire, despite troop shortages and political disputes. The digests from Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer and Madison Courier stated that Uganda's participation details were being finalised.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Uganda and Burundi officials discuss Gaza troop deployment with Israel?
- Of the 15 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 60% are rated left, 20% are rated centre, 20% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 16. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Uganda and Burundi officials discuss Gaza troop deployment with Israel left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 15 rated outlets on this story, 60% are rated left, 20% are rated centre, 20% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Uganda and Burundi officials discuss Gaza troop deployment with Israel biased?
- Uganda and Burundi officials discuss Gaza troop deployment with Israel is one event reported by 16 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Uganda and Burundi officials discuss Gaza troop deployment with Israel?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Uganda and Burundi officials discuss Gaza troop deployment with Israel?
- 16 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- Which countries are discussing troop deployment to Gaza?
- Military officials from Uganda and Burundi visited Israel to discuss deploying troops to Gaza. This is part of an international security force envisioned by U.S. President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace. Uganda has committed around 1,200 personnel, while Burundi's participation is still under discussion.
- What is the purpose of the proposed international security force?
- The international security force is envisioned to help monitor a ceasefire in Gaza, train Palestinian police, and secure the delivery of aid. It is part of a plan by U.S. President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace.
- What is Uganda's commitment to the force?
- Uganda has committed approximately 1,200 personnel to the international security force for Gaza. The country's parliament has approved this troop contribution, and details of its participation are being finalised.
- Why did Indonesia pause its troop deployment plans?
- Indonesia had previously stated it was preparing to send 8,000 troops to Gaza. However, this plan was put on hold following military actions taken by the U.S. and Israel against Iran.
Read it at the source
16 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
9- Uganda, Burundi discuss deploying troops to Gaza security force (opens The Siasat Daily in a new tab)
The Siasat Daily — is The Siasat Daily biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Uganda and Burundi military officials visit Israel to discuss Gaza troop deployment (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Uganda and Burundi military officials visit Israel to discuss Gaza troop deployment (opens The Seattle Times in a new tab)
The Seattle Times — is The Seattle Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Uganda and Burundi military officials visit Israel to discuss Gaza troop deployment (opens Oskaloosa Herald in a new tab)
Oskaloosa Herald — is Oskaloosa Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Uganda and Burundi military officials visit Israel to discuss Gaza troop deployment (opens The Independent (US) in a new tab)
The Independent (US) — is The Independent (US) biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Uganda and Burundi military officials visit Israel to discuss Gaza troop deployment (opens Associated Press News in a new tab)
Associated Press News — is Associated Press News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Uganda and Burundi military officials visit Israel to discuss Gaza troop deployment (opens The Independent in a new tab)
The Independent — is The Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Uganda and Burundi military officials visit Israel to discuss Gaza troop deployment (opens The Record in a new tab)
The Record — is The Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
3- East African troops prepare for Gaza peacekeeping role in US-backed plan (opens South China Morning Post in a new tab)
South China Morning Post — is South China Morning Post biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Uganda and Burundi military officials visit Israel to discuss Gaza troop deployment (opens My Mother Lode in a new tab)
My Mother Lode — is My Mother Lode biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Uganda and Burundi military officials visit Israel to discuss Gaza troop deployment (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
3- Uganda, Burundi discuss Gaza troop role in Trump-backed peace force (opens India Today in a new tab)
India Today — is India Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Uganda and Burundi military officials visit Israel to discuss Gaza troop deployment (opens Madison Courier in a new tab)
Madison Courier — is Madison Courier biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Uganda and Burundi military officials visit Israel to discuss Gaza troop deployment (opens Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer in a new tab)
Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer — is Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
1How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
More in Conflict & Security
All Conflict & Security →Elsewhere on the site
Politics•3 min readUS Treasury Secretary Vows 'Economic D-Day' Against Iran
Politics•3 min readEx-diplomats urge France, UK to enforce law in Palestinian territories