UK antisemitic incidents rise to 1,926 in first half of 2026, CST reports
Government announces draft regulations to designate Islamic Movement of Companions of the Right a national security threat
MediaBias Comparison Desk
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised
This article was written at the MediaBias News desk from the one-paragraph digests an aggregator publishes for each of the outlets listed below it, together with 2 of those outlets' own reports read in full. How we do it
Anti semitism rally in London
Photograph: Daily Mirror (embedded from source)
What this story says
- The Community Security Trust recorded 1,926 antisemitic incidents in the UK from January to June 2026, the second-highest total for a six-month period.
- The government announced draft regulations to designate the Islamic Movement of Companions of the Right as a national security threat, following arson attacks on Jewish community ambulances.
- The CST reported 71 antisemitic incidents in the three days after the April 29 stabbings in Golders Green, including celebrations of the violence.
- The government is investing £250 million to boost policing in Jewish neighbourhoods, according to the policing and crime minister.
The Community Security Trust (CST) recorded 1,926 antisemitic incidents in the UK between January and June 2026. This figure is the second-highest total for a six-month period since the CST began recording data. The CST attributed the rise to a combination of state-directed threats from Iran and internally driven extremism.
The Islamic Movement of Companions of the Right, a group with suspected links to pro-Iranian networks, claimed responsibility for arson attacks on Jewish community ambulances in Golders Green in March 2026. The UK government announced draft regulations in July 2026 to designate the group as a threat to national security, alongside Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
The CST reported 71 antisemitic incidents in the three days following the April 29 stabbings in Golders Green, which left two men injured. Sixteen of these incidents directly referenced the attack, with some celebrating the violence or promoting antisemitic conspiracy theories. The week after the start of the Israel-US war on Iran on February 28 also saw a 71% increase in antisemitic incidents compared to the previous week.
“Behind these appalling numbers are people living in fear just for being who they are.”
What the coverage left out
No centre- or right-rated outlets ran this story at all. The omission is a finding: the story’s reach was limited to the left-rated report printed below.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
- The Daily Mirror led on the personal impact of antisemitism, quoting policing and crime minister Sarah Jones describing Jewish people as "living in fear just for being who they are". The report highlighted the government’s £250 million investment to boost policing in Jewish neighbourhoods and the CST’s role in protecting synagogues and schools.
- The Daily Mirror quoted CST chief executive Mark Gardner stating that the incidents "should concern everyone who cares about Britain and the threats against it, whether state-directed from Iran, or internally driven by Islamist, far Right, far Left, or other ideological extremes". The report also included comments from Lord Mann, the government’s independent advisor on antisemitism, who described the figures as demonstrating that "anti-Jewish racism in the UK remains at an all-time high".
Centre
We hold no leaning breakdown for this story, so there is nothing to report about the centre.
Right
We hold no leaning breakdown for this story, so there is nothing to report about the right.
Read it at the source
1 outlet, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
1Centre
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Right
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
