Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Conflict & Security382 outlets ran this2 min read

Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7 September

GUR operators hit the bomber, identified by tail number 49, while damage assessment remains ongoing

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7 September

What this story says

  • Ukrainian intelligence operators struck a Russian aircraft in temporarily occupied Crimea on the night of 7 September.
  • The released video shows the aircraft as a Su‑24 with tail number 49.
  • Damage to the aircraft was still being assessed and a crash was not confirmed.
  • Left‑rated outlets highlighted the operation as a special‑forces success and a “gift” for Intelligence Day, while centre‑rated outlets provided the aircraft identification and an official quote.

Who covered it

Left 31%(50)Centre 37%(60)Right 32%(52)

Percentages are shares of the 162 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 220 of the 382 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

86/100

Craft

70/100

Hype

32/100

382 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 52 of the 162 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

On the night of 7 September, operators of the Department of Active Actions of Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate reported that they hit a Russian aircraft in the temporarily occupied peninsula of Crimea. The statement was posted on the directorate’s Telegram channel.

Video released by the directorate shows the target as a Su‑24 bomber bearing the tail number 49. The directorate said that the degree of damage to the aircraft was still being clarified and did not confirm a crash.

Discrepancy over aircraft type

The ZN.UA report identifies the target as a Su‑24, while digests such as LB.ua refer only to a Russian aircraft. Other digests, for example Gazeta.ua and armyinform.com.ua, also specify a Su‑24, whereas some, like hromadske.ua, describe the target simply as a Russian plane.

““Подарунок до Дня воєнної розвідки України. Ми з вами знаємо, що свято без подарунків, не свято. Тож ДАД подбав, а окупант, отримав доставку”.”

— GUR statement, as reproduced by ZN.UA

49

Aircraft tail number

Seen in the video released by the directorate

What the right omitted

No right‑rated outlet published a story about the strike, so right‑rated coverage is absent.

Tags:#UkraineConflict#MilitaryIntelligence#GUR#Crimea#Su24#Aviation

Coverage settled. We checked this 9 times and stopped on 13 Sept 2026, 13:45. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

50 rated outlets

  • Two left‑rated outlets reported a Ukrainian intelligence strike on a Russian aircraft in temporarily occupied Crimea on 7 September. United24’s full article and an unnamed digest both placed the event on that date, describing it as a nighttime operation.
  • United24 noted that HUR released video of the operation, said its operators carried it out, and that damage to the aircraft was still being evaluated. The report added that media sources suggested the target may have been a Su‑24. The unnamed digest explicitly identified the downed plane as a Su‑24, citing Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Agency.
  • censor.net and rbc.ua digests mentioned a successful special operation by Ukrainian defence intelligence in Crimea but omitted the aircraft type and the 7 September date. The remaining eight left‑rated sources in the sample did not address the Crimea strike, focusing instead on separate missile and drone attacks on Kyiv.

Centre

60 rated outlets

  • ZN.UA’s full article identified the aircraft as a Su‑24 with tail number 49, quoted the directorate’s statement about a “gift” for Intelligence Day and said the damage level was being clarified. The 15min.lt digest reported that officers of the Active Operations Department carried out the attack, but did not mention the tail number.

Right

52 rated outlets

  • All twelve right‑rated digests reported that Russia resumed air attacks on Kyiv after a three‑day halt that coincided with visits by United States envoys. They noted drones and missiles were used, three people were killed and several injured, and mayor Vitali Klitschko was quoted on the casualties.
  • The digests repeatedly linked the renewed strikes to the presence of U.S. officials, naming Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner as the envoys whose visits ended the pause. Several items cited a CNN report and described the assault as massive, complex, or coordinated, highlighting dozens of drones and cruise missiles.
  • None of the right‑rated digests mention the Ukrainian intelligence strike on a Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7 September, nor do they provide any cost estimate, location details, or statements from Ukrainian officials. Their coverage remains confined to the Kyiv attacks and the associated diplomatic context.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7…?
Of the 162 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 31% are rated left, 37% are rated centre, 32% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 382. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 162 rated outlets on this story, 31% are rated left, 37% are rated centre, 32% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7… biased?
Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7 September is one event reported by 382 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7…?
382 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
When did the strike take place?
The strike was carried out during the night of 7 September, as reported by Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate on its Telegram channel.
What type of aircraft was hit?
The video released by the directorate shows a Su‑24 bomber; centre‑rated ZN.UA explicitly identified it as such, while some digests referred only to a generic Russian plane.
Was the aircraft’s tail number disclosed?
Yes. The footage displayed the tail number 49, which was mentioned in the ZN.UA full report.
What did the left‑rated outlets focus on?
The left‑rated outlets highlighted that GUR special forces carried out the operation, presented it as a “gift” for Intelligence Day, and emphasized the release of a video, without specifying aircraft type or tail number.

Read it at the source

384 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

52
Show 44 more

Centre

60
Show 52 more

Right

52
Show 44 more

Not rated

220
Show 212 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Conflict & Security

All Conflict & Security →
Russia Has Up to 700 Ballistic Missiles, 6,200 Attack Drones Ready to Strike Ukraine, Intelligence Says3 min readUkraine Intelligence: Russia Has 700 Ballistic Missiles in ReserveRead storyKyiv hit by Russian ballistic missiles, one dead, 22 injured3 min readKyiv hit by Russian ballistic missiles, one dead, 22 injuredRead storyTrump says Starshield access restored for Ukraine3 min readTrump says Starshield access restored for UkraineRead story
Ukraine strikes Russian Su-24 | MediaBias News