Skip to the story
All stories

Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7 September

GUR operators hit the bomber, identified by tail number 49, while damage assessment remains ongoing

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7 September

What this story says

  • Ukrainian intelligence operators struck a Russian aircraft in temporarily occupied Crimea on the night of 7 September.
  • The released video shows the aircraft as a Su‑24 with tail number 49.
  • Damage to the aircraft was still being assessed and a crash was not confirmed.
  • Left‑rated outlets highlighted the operation as a special‑forces success and a “gift” for Intelligence Day, while centre‑rated outlets provided the aircraft identification and an official quote.

Who covered it

Left 67%(4)Centre 33%(2)Right 0%(0)

Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 13 of the 19 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

86/100

Craft

70/100

Hype

32/100

19 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

None of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

On the night of 7 September, operators of the Department of Active Actions of Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate reported that they hit a Russian aircraft in the temporarily occupied peninsula of Crimea. The statement was posted on the directorate’s Telegram channel.

Video released by the directorate shows the target as a Su‑24 bomber bearing the tail number 49. The directorate said that the degree of damage to the aircraft was still being clarified and did not confirm a crash.

Discrepancy over aircraft type

The ZN.UA report identifies the target as a Su‑24, while digests such as LB.ua refer only to a Russian aircraft. Other digests, for example Gazeta.ua and armyinform.com.ua, also specify a Su‑24, whereas some, like hromadske.ua, describe the target simply as a Russian plane.

“Подарунок до Дня воєнної розвідки України. Ми з вами знаємо, що свято без подарунків, не свято. Тож ДАД подбав, а окупант, отримав доставку”.

GUR statement, as reproduced by ZN.UA

49

Aircraft tail number

Seen in the video released by the directorate

What the right omitted

No right‑rated outlet published a story about the strike, so right‑rated coverage is absent.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 2 times, most recently on 8 Sept 2026, 04:45, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

4 rated outlets

  • censor.net, rbc.ua and United24 each reported that GUR special forces carried out the strike, described the operation as a successful “gift” on Military Intelligence Day and noted that a video of the attack was released. None of the three outlets specified the aircraft type or tail number, focusing instead on the role of the operators and the celebratory framing.

Centre

2 rated outlets

  • ZN.UA’s full article identified the aircraft as a Su‑24 with tail number 49, quoted the directorate’s statement about a “gift” for Intelligence Day and said the damage level was being clarified. The 15min.lt digest reported that officers of the Active Operations Department carried out the attack, but did not mention the tail number.

Right

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7…?
Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 67% are rated left, 33% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 19. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7… left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7… biased?
Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7 September is one event reported by 19 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Ukrainian intelligence strikes Russian Su‑24 in occupied Crimea on 7…?
19 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
When did the strike take place?
The strike was carried out during the night of 7 September, as reported by Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate on its Telegram channel.
What type of aircraft was hit?
The video released by the directorate shows a Su‑24 bomber; centre‑rated ZN.UA explicitly identified it as such, while some digests referred only to a generic Russian plane.
Was the aircraft’s tail number disclosed?
Yes. The footage displayed the tail number 49, which was mentioned in the ZN.UA full report.
What did the left‑rated outlets focus on?
The left‑rated outlets highlighted that GUR special forces carried out the operation, presented it as a “gift” for Intelligence Day, and emphasized the release of a video, without specifying aircraft type or tail number.

Read it at the source

19 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

4

Centre

2

Right

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Not rated

13
Show 5 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Ukraine strikes Russian Su-24 | MediaBias News