Skip to the story
All stories

UPS Error Sent F-35 Parts Through Hong Kong to China

US investigating after sensitive fighter jet components were mistakenly routed via China.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
UPS Error Sent F-35 Parts Through Hong Kong to China

What this story says

  • Parts for the F-35 fighter jet were mistakenly shipped through Hong Kong by UPS, ending up in China.
  • The shipment included components coated with radar-absorbent material, intended for delivery from Australia to San Francisco.
  • A UPS employee reportedly missed an electronic warning not to route the shipment through Hong Kong.
  • The Pentagon and US State Department are investigating the incident, which violates International Traffic in Arms Regulations.

Who covered it

Left 9%(1)Centre 36%(4)Right 55%(6)

Percentages are shares of the 11 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 15 of the 26 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

57/100

Hype

41/100

26 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 1 of the 11 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Components for the F-35 fighter jet, including parts of the cockpit canopy and weapons bay door coated with radar-absorbent material, were mistakenly routed through Hong Kong by UPS. The shipment originated in Australia and was destined for San Francisco. According to reports, a UPS employee failed to notice an electronic instruction or email that warned against routing the cargo through Hong Kong.

The incident has triggered investigations by the Pentagon and the US State Department. At least two Congressional committees are also reviewing the supply chain for US weaponry. The transit of these components through Hong Kong is a violation of International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which govern the movement of certain US military items.

Disagreement on shipment details

While most reports agree that F-35 parts were mistakenly routed through Hong Kong due to a UPS error, details about the full itinerary vary. fakti.bg reports that the shipment first stopped in South Korea before being rerouted through Hong Kong, though the reason for the initial stop is unclear. vz.ru states the cargo was intended for delivery to San Francisco via South Korea and Taiwan.

Omissions in coverage

None of the right-rated digests mention the specific components of the F-35 involved, such as the cockpit canopy and weapons bay door, nor do they detail the radar-absorbent material coating. The left-rated report from fakti.bg is the only one to include statements from Lockheed Martin and the Australian Minister of Defence.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 5 times, most recently on 8 Oct 2026, 09:15, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

1 rated outlet

  • The left-rated report from fakti.bg led with the headline "F-35 Parts Ended up in China Due to UPS Error". It detailed the specific components involved, including the cockpit canopy and weapons bay door, and noted they were covered with radar-absorbent material. The report mentioned the shipment was intended to go from Australia to San Francisco and that a UPS employee missed an electronic instruction not to route it through Hong Kong. It also stated that the components remained in Chinese hands and had not been returned. The report included statements from Lockheed Martin, the F-35 manufacturer, and the Australian Minister of Defence, Richard Marles.

Centre

4 rated outlets

  • Hindustan Times, rated centre, used the headline "How a UPS worker's missed email resulted in China getting F-35 stealth fighter jet parts from the US". The digest focused on the core event: China acquiring F-35 parts due to a missed email by a UPS employee. It highlighted the role of the missed communication in the incident.

Right

6 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports from Anadolu Ajansı and vz.ru both used headlines that attributed the incident to a missed email or a careless delivery person at UPS. Anadolu Ajansı's headline stated, "China Got Hold of Parts From F-35 Stealth Fighter Jet Due to Missed Email at UPS: Report," and its digest noted that Pentagon officials briefed House committee staff, citing a Bloomberg report, and that the State Department was investigating. vz.ru's headline was "Bloomberg: China Received Spare Parts for F-35 Due to a Careless Deliveryer," and its digest mentioned the cargo included an F-35 fighter lantern and an arm compartment door covered with radar-absorbing material, intended for delivery to San Francisco via South Korea and Taiwan.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover UPS Error Sent F-35 Parts Through Hong Kong to China?
Of the 11 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 9% are rated left, 36% are rated centre, 55% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 26. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is UPS Error Sent F-35 Parts Through Hong Kong to China left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 11 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of UPS Error Sent F-35 Parts Through Hong Kong to China biased?
UPS Error Sent F-35 Parts Through Hong Kong to China is one event reported by 26 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting UPS Error Sent F-35 Parts Through Hong Kong to China?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered UPS Error Sent F-35 Parts Through Hong Kong to China?
26 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What happened with the F-35 parts shipment?
Parts for the F-35 fighter jet were mistakenly routed through Hong Kong by UPS, leading to them being acquired by China. The shipment contained components coated with radar-absorbent material and was intended to go from Australia to San Francisco.
Why did the F-35 parts end up in China?
A UPS employee reportedly missed an electronic instruction or email warning not to route the shipment through Hong Kong. This oversight caused the sensitive military components to be rerouted through the Chinese territory.
What is being done about the incident?
The Pentagon and the US State Department are investigating the incident. Additionally, at least two Congressional committees are reviewing the supply chain for US weaponry. The incident violates International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).

Read it at the source

26 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

1

Centre

4

Right

6

Not rated

15
Show 7 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

F-35 parts sent to China | MediaBias News