US troops leave Iraq, raising security concerns
Experts and Iraqi officials warn of potential exploitation of the security vacuum by Iran and ISIS.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Im Irak wird der US-Truppenabzug als „Tag der Unabhängigkeit“ gefeiert. © Hadi Mizban/AP/dpa
Photograph: merkur.de (embedded from source)
What this story says
- The US military has ended its mission in Iraq, with troops having first entered the country in 2003 and returning later to combat ISIS.
- Experts and Iraqi officials have warned that Iran and the Islamic State group may exploit the security vacuum left by the US withdrawal.
- Iraq's foreign minister has raised concerns about potential infiltration of ISIS fighters from Syria.
- Some Iraqis are reportedly not optimistic about the country's readiness to assume full security responsibility.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 9 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 2 of the 11 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
42/100
Craft
57/100
Hype
68/100
11 sources · methodology
Thin on the left so far
None of the 9 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
The United States military has concluded its mission in Iraq. US troops initially entered Iraq in 2003 and withdrew in 2011, before returning to assist in the fight against the Islamic State group. The withdrawal has led to celebrations among some Iraqis who attributed years of instability to the foreign military presence. However, experts have cautioned that the departure could create a power vacuum that adversaries of the US, including Iran and the Islamic State, might exploit.
Iraq's foreign minister has specifically warned of the potential for ISIS fighters to infiltrate the country from Syria. This concern comes as some Iraqis have expressed doubts about the nation's preparedness to fully manage its own security following the US departure. The situation has been further complicated by regional tensions and the ongoing conflict in neighbouring Syria.
Disagreement on US withdrawal timeline
Merkur.de and hna.de reported that President Joe Biden had reached an agreement with Baghdad in 2024 to end the US military presence by September 2025. They also noted that developments in Syria allowed a small contingent of US advisors and security personnel to remain beyond that date. In contrast, nytimespost.com stated that President Donald J. Trump announced the departure of the last American forces from Iraq and that Operation Inherent Resolve is set to end in 2026.
What the coverage left out
None of the left-rated reports mentioned the US military's departure from Iraq. The centre-rated reports did not mention President Donald J. Trump's declaration of the departure as a victory for the United States and Iraq, nor did they state that the military was bringing back all its equipment.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 2 times, most recently on 2 Oct 2026, 21:45, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated left has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Centre
5 rated outlets
- The centre-rated reports led with the US military's final departure from Iraq and the potential for Iran and the Islamic State to exploit the resulting security gap. These reports detailed the history of US intervention, including the 2003 invasion and the later return to combat ISIS. They also highlighted concerns from experts and local leaders, such as a tribal leader in Fallujah, who expressed doubts about Iraq's readiness to assume full security responsibility. The reports from merkur.de and hna.de also included details about a restructuring within the US military, specifically plans to reduce the number of reserved positions for generals and admirals.
Right
4 rated outlets
- The right-rated reports focused on Iraq sounding an alarm about a terror threat from Syria, occurring one day after US troops left. These reports highlighted Iraq's foreign minister warning that ISIS fighters could cross the border from Syria. The reports also mentioned President Donald J. Trump declaring the departure a victory for the United States and Iraq, and that the military was bringing back all its equipment. The end of Operation Inherent Resolve in 2026 was also noted.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover US troops leave Iraq, raising security concerns?
- Of the 9 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 0% are rated left, 56% are rated centre, 44% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 11. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is US troops leave Iraq, raising security concerns left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 9 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of US troops leave Iraq, raising security concerns biased?
- US troops leave Iraq, raising security concerns is one event reported by 11 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting US troops leave Iraq, raising security concerns?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered US troops leave Iraq, raising security concerns?
- 11 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- Why are experts concerned about the US withdrawal from Iraq?
- Experts are concerned that the US military's departure from Iraq may create a security vacuum. They warn that adversaries of the US, specifically Iran and the Islamic State group, could exploit this situation to increase their influence or operations within the country.
- What specific terror threat has Iraq warned about?
- Iraq's foreign minister has warned of the possibility that Islamic State fighters could infiltrate the country by crossing the border from Syria. This concern has been raised following the formal end of the US counter-ISIS mission in Iraq.
- How long have US troops been involved in Iraq?
- US troops first entered Iraq in 2003. They withdrew in 2011 but returned less than three years later to assist in the fight against the Islamic State group, with their mission now concluded.
Read it at the source
11 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Centre
5- Iraq After US Withdrawal: Iran and ISIS Exploit Emerging Security Gap (opens tz.de in a new tab)
- Iraq After US Withdrawal: Iran and ISIS Exploit Emerging Security Gap (opens merkur.de in a new tab)
- Iraq After US Withdrawal: Iran and ISIS Exploit Emerging Security Gap (opens mannheim24.de in a new tab)
mannheim24.de — is mannheim24.de biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Iraq After US Withdrawal: Iran and ISIS Exploit Emerging Security Gap (opens Kreiszeitung in a new tab)
Kreiszeitung — is Kreiszeitung biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Iraq After US Withdrawal: Iran and ISIS Exploit Emerging Security Gap (opens hna.de in a new tab)
Right
4- Iraq sounds alarm on terror threat from Syria one day after US troops leave - NEW YORK TIMES POST (opens nytimespost.com in a new tab)
nytimespost.com — is nytimespost.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Iraq sounds alarm on terror threat from Syria one day after US troops leave (opens wfmd.com in a new tab)
- Iraq sounds alarm on terror threat from Syria one day after US troops leave – Democratic Accent (opens democraticaccent.com in a new tab)
democraticaccent.com — is democraticaccent.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Iraq sounds alarm on terror threat from Syria one day after US troops leave (opens Fox News in a new tab)
Not rated
2How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.




