Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Health26 outlets ran this3 min read

Trump administration delayed PFAS wastewater survey, ex-EPA officials claim

A study to identify sources of harmful chemicals was submitted to the White House for approval nearly two years ago.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Trump administration delayed PFAS wastewater survey, ex-EPA officials claim

What this story says

  • The Trump administration delayed a survey of PFAS in wastewater, according to two former EPA officials.
  • The survey was submitted to the White House Office of Management and Budget in October 2024 and has not yet been approved.
  • PFAS chemicals are linked to increased risks of certain cancers and developmental effects in children.
  • A nationwide survey would help identify sources of PFAS and inform new regulations, former EPA director Robert Wood stated.

Who covered it

Left 56%(13)Centre 40%(9)Right 4%(1)

Percentages are shares of the 23 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 3 of the 26 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

80/100

Craft

85/100

Hype

15/100

26 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

Only 1 of the 23 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Two former officials from the Environmental Protection Agency have stated that the Trump administration stalled a survey intended to identify industries releasing harmful PFAS chemicals into wastewater. The survey was submitted to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval in October 2024. According to former EPA director Robert Wood, a nationwide survey of wastewater treatment plants would be instrumental in pinpointing PFAS sources and guiding the development of new regulations.

PFAS, often referred to as "forever chemicals," are man-made substances linked to serious health issues, including increased risks of certain cancers, developmental problems in children, and reduced vaccine efficacy. These chemicals are widely present in the environment and are difficult to remove. Wastewater treatment plants typically release them back into rivers and soil because they are not equipped to separate them from waste.

Disagreement on review timelines

According to Stuart Shapiro, a former OMB staffer, reviews by the White House Office of Management and Budget typically take about 60 days. He noted that the submission of the PFAS survey in October 2024 represents an unusually long period for approval. The EPA and OMB did not respond to requests for comment, as reported by AP and My Mother Lode.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated, centre-rated, or right-rated reports printed below mention the specific date of October 2024 for the survey's submission to the White House Office of Management and Budget. The full reports from AP and My Mother Lode state this date, but it is not present in the digests or the full report from The Washington Times.

Tags:#PFAS#EnvironmentalProtection#TrumpAdministration#PublicHealth#Chemicals

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 5 times, most recently on 4 Sept 2026, 00:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

13 rated outlets

  • Thirteen left-rated reports highlighted the claim that the Trump administration stalled the PFAS survey. These reports frequently mentioned the health risks associated with PFAS, including links to cancer and developmental effects in children. They also quoted former EPA officials like Robert Wood and Betsy Southerland, who suggested the delay might be due to the chemical industry's potential disruption. Some reports noted the administration's "nuanced, and at times controversial, stance towards PFAS," including criticism from environmentalists over an "agency approach to chemical regulation that’s too industry-friendly."

Centre

9 rated outlets

  • Eight centre-rated reports focused on the assertion that the Trump administration delayed the PFAS wastewater survey. These reports included details about the survey's submission to the OMB in October 2024 and the typical review timeline of around 60 days, contrasting it with the extended delay. They also mentioned the health risks linked to PFAS, such as cancer and developmental issues. The reports noted that the EPA and OMB did not provide comment.

Right

1 rated outlet

  • The single right-rated report stated that two former agency officials claimed the Trump administration stalled a study to understand which industries dump harmful forever chemicals in their wastewater. It included the detail that the survey was submitted to the White House for approval nearly two years ago.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Trump administration delayed PFAS wastewater survey, ex-EPA officials…?
Of the 23 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 56% are rated left, 40% are rated centre, 4% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 26. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Trump administration delayed PFAS wastewater survey, ex-EPA officials… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 23 rated outlets on this story, 56% are rated left, 40% are rated centre, 4% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Trump administration delayed PFAS wastewater survey, ex-EPA officials… biased?
Trump administration delayed PFAS wastewater survey, ex-EPA officials claim is one event reported by 26 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Trump administration delayed PFAS wastewater survey, ex-EPA officials…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Trump administration delayed PFAS wastewater survey, ex-EPA officials…?
26 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What are PFAS chemicals and why are they a concern?
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are man-made chemicals found in many products. They are a public health concern because they are linked to increased risks of certain cancers, developmental effects in children, and are resistant to vaccines. These chemicals are also persistent in the environment and difficult to remove.
What was the purpose of the stalled survey?
The survey was intended to identify which industries are releasing PFAS chemicals into wastewater. This information could help regulators understand the sources of contamination and develop new regulations to limit the spread of these harmful substances.
When was the survey submitted for approval and how long do reviews typically take?
The survey was submitted to the White House Office of Management and Budget in October 2024. Reviews by the OMB typically take around 60 days, according to a former OMB staffer, indicating a significant delay in this case.

Read it at the source

26 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

13
Show 5 more

Centre

9
Show 1 more

Right

1

Not rated

3

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Health

All Health →
Texas Hospitals Face $27 Million Daily Medicaid Funding Loss4 min readTexas Hospitals Face $27 Million Daily Medicaid Funding LossRead storyPentagon mandates testosterone screening for US service members aged 30 and older5 min readPentagon mandates testosterone screening for US service members aged 30 and olderRead storyA certified medical assistant holds a syringe for a flu vaccine at a clinic in Seattle, on Sept. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson, File)4 min readUS medical groups issue own vaccine guidelines after CDC silence on fall 2026 shotsRead story

Elsewhere on the site

Flags are placed as workers survey the Memorial Circle, where President Donald Trump has proposed building an arch to commemorate the United States' 250th anniversary, May 11, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)Politics•3 min readTrump administration to begin excavation for Washington archCypress trees grow in Heron Pond in the Shawnee National Forest near Belknap, Ill., April 9, 2013. (AP Photo/Seth Perlman, File)Politics•5 min readJudge halts Shawnee National Forest logging project over endangered batJudge Dismisses DOJ Lawsuit Against California Transgender Sports PolicyPolitics•3 min readJudge Dismisses DOJ Lawsuit Against California Transgender Sports PolicySupreme courtPolitics•3 min readTrump administration asks Supreme Court to lift mail-ballot order
Trump administration delayed PFAS wastewater survey | MediaBias News