Skip to the story
All stories

CBC guidance on calling 9/11 'terrorist attacks' draws criticism

Canadian broadcaster reportedly advises journalists to avoid the term without attribution, sparking debate.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Canadian Broadcaster Tells Staff Not to Call 9/11 Terror Attacks

What this story says

  • CBC reportedly issued internal guidance advising journalists not to use the term 'terrorist attacks' for 9/11 without attribution.
  • The guidance suggests alternative phrasing such as 'the hijackings led to passenger jet crashes'.
  • CBC's director of public affairs stated the broadcaster prefers attribution for the terms 'terrorist' and 'terrorism'.
  • Canadian politicians and media watchdogs have criticised the alleged guidance as disrespectful and an attempt to rewrite history.

Who covered it

Left 52%(23)Centre 21%(9)Right 27%(12)

Percentages are shares of the 44 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 7 of the 51 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

51/100

Hype

65/100

51 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 12 of the 44 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

Canada's public broadcaster, the CBC, has reportedly issued internal guidance advising journalists not to refer to the September 11 attacks as 'terrorist attacks' unless attributed to a source. The guidance, allegedly from Basem Boshra, senior director of journalistic standards and public trust, suggests alternative phrasing such as 'the hijackings led to passenger jet crashes in Washington, DC, Pennsylvania and Manhattan'.

The reported instruction comes as the CBC prepares coverage for the 25th anniversary of the attacks. According to reports, the guidance also noted that 'The World Trade Center was destroyed,' directing staff to CBC's internal language standards. The broadcaster's general manager and editor-in-chief, Brodie Fenlon, previously stated in a blog that CBC does not designate groups or acts as terrorist because the terms are 'loaded with meaning, politics and emotion' and can impede journalism. Fenlon advised journalists to generally avoid referring to specific assaults as terrorist acts unless attributed.

Disagreement on guidance

CBC's director of public affairs, Kerry Kelly, stated that it is 'wholly inaccurate to state our journalists have been urged to declare that this was not a terrorist act.' She said the broadcaster 'regularly send reminders about adherence to CBC’s longstanding language guidance regarding the terms ‘terrorist’ and ‘terrorism’,' and that CBC prefers to use these words with attribution to credible sources. She further alleged the memo served as a 'reminder' of the broadcaster’s 'longstanding practice' to use these terms with attribution.

What the coverage left out

None of the reports below mention the specific figure of 3,000 people killed in the September 11 attacks, which was stated in the full report from Internewscast.

Coverage settled. We checked this 103 times and stopped on 2 Sept 2026, 19:45. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

23 rated outlets

  • Outlets such as unn.ua, Mediaite, detector.media, Rocky Mountain Outlook, SooToday.com, Orillia Matters, Thorold Today, Elora Fergus Today, Sudbury, Bay Today and ElliotLakeToday.com reported that CBC/Radio‑Canada maintains a long‑standing policy of not labeling the September 11 attacks as terrorism and that the policy attracted criticism ahead of the 25th anniversary.
  • The Associated Press News article noted that CBC announced an exception for the September 11 attacks, that Culture Minister Marc Miller praised the change on social media, and that U.S. officials including FBI Director Kash Patel and Ambassador Pete Hoekstra expressed anger, calling the earlier guidance a distortion of history.
  • The digests did not include the specific reactions from U.S. officials or the Canadian minister’s praise that appear in the AP report, nor did they quote the statements describing the guidance as a distortion of history.

Centre

9 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated reports focused on the leaked memo and the resulting criticism. One report stated that 'Ahead of the 25th anniversary of 9/11, CBC journalists were reportedly told to avoid describing the attacks as “terrorist attacks,” drawing criticism in Canada.' Another report highlighted that the 'Canadian broadcaster tells staff not to call 9/11 terror attacks'.

Right

12 rated outlets

  • Right-rated outlets reported that the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) issued guidance to its staff not to refer to the 9/11 attacks as "terrorist attacks." This directive was reportedly contained in an internal memo.
  • Several reports noted the guidance came ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attacks. Some outlets stated the CBC defended the memo, with one reporting the broadcaster called the term politically and emotionally loaded.
  • One report mentioned a Conservative Party Member of Parliament, Rachel Thomas, stating that the refusal to call it an act of terror harms victims' dignity. Another report cited Basem Boshra as the author of the memo.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover CBC guidance on calling 9/11 'terrorist attacks' draws criticism?
Of the 44 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 52% are rated left, 21% are rated centre, 27% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 51. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is CBC guidance on calling 9/11 'terrorist attacks' draws criticism left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 44 rated outlets on this story, 52% are rated left, 21% are rated centre, 27% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of CBC guidance on calling 9/11 'terrorist attacks' draws criticism biased?
CBC guidance on calling 9/11 'terrorist attacks' draws criticism is one event reported by 51 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting CBC guidance on calling 9/11 'terrorist attacks' draws criticism?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered CBC guidance on calling 9/11 'terrorist attacks' draws criticism?
51 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is the CBC reportedly advising its journalists about referring to 9/11?
CBC has reportedly issued internal guidance advising journalists not to refer to the September 11 attacks as 'terrorist attacks' without attribution. The guidance suggests alternative phrasing such as 'the hijackings led to passenger jet crashes'.
How has the CBC responded to the reports about the guidance?
CBC's director of public affairs stated it is inaccurate to say journalists have been urged not to declare 9/11 a terrorist act. She said the broadcaster exercises caution and prefers attribution for the terms 'terrorist' and 'terrorism'.
Who has criticised the alleged guidance?
Canadian politicians, including Conservative MP Rachael Thomas, and media watchdogs have criticised the alleged guidance. They argue it is disrespectful to victims and an attempt to rewrite history.

Read it at the source

150 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

45
Show 37 more

Centre

24
Show 16 more

Right

57
Show 49 more

Not rated

24
Show 16 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

CBC 9/11 terminology guidance | MediaBias News