Skip to the story
All stories

Federal judge asked to drop charges against Don Lemon over St Paul church protest

Lemon’s lawyers argue the indictment stems from President Donald Trump’s animus toward the journalist

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Federal judge asked to drop charges against Don Lemon over St Paul church protest

What this story says

  • Don Lemon filed a motion on 7 August 2026 to dismiss federal charges tied to his presence at an anti-ICE protest in a St Paul church on 18 January 2026.
  • Lemon’s lawyers argue the indictment stems from President Donald Trump’s longstanding animus toward him and violates the First Amendment.
  • The charges allege Lemon violated the FACE Act, which prohibits intimidation or interference with religious practice, but Lemon maintains he was there as a journalist.
  • No right-rated outlet covered the story, according to the reports below.

Who covered it

Left 25%(7)Centre 50%(14)Right 25%(7)

Percentages are shares of the 28 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 29 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

68/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

30/100

29 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 7 of the 28 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

Don Lemon, a former CNN anchor, asked a federal judge to dismiss criminal civil-rights charges against him on 7 August 2026. The charges relate to his presence at an anti-ICE protest inside a St Paul, Minnesota church on 18 January 2026. Lemon was arrested in Los Angeles on 29 January 2026 while covering the Grammy Awards, in connection with the earlier protest.

The charges allege Lemon violated the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, which prohibits intimidation or interference with individuals’ constitutional right to practice religion. Lemon has pleaded not guilty. His lawyers argue the indictment is motivated by President Donald Trump’s animus toward Lemon and violates the First Amendment. They claim the Justice Department acted on Trump’s hostility by filing charges against a journalist for reporting on the protest.

Lemon’s legal team, led by attorney Abbe Lowell, wrote in the motion that the government’s case agent falsely claimed Lemon joined protesters by chanting and obstructing parishioners. Lemon has consistently stated he was present as a journalist covering the demonstration, which he livestreamed. The motion also describes the arrest as an effort to humiliate Lemon, noting federal agents arrested him at his Los Angeles hotel at midnight while he was covering the Grammy Awards.

The government should not be permitted to use criminal prosecutions to chill journalism disfavored by the President.

Don Lemon’s lawyers, as quoted by Variety

What the coverage left out

No right-rated outlet ran the story at all, according to the reports below. None of the centre-rated digests mentioned Lemon’s challenge to the constitutionality of the FACE Act, which the Minnesota Reformer’s digest highlighted as potentially having far-reaching consequences. Only Variety’s full report included Lemon’s statement that the Justice Department sought to "embarrass" and "instill fear" in him.

Coverage settled. We checked this 25 times and stopped on 13 Aug 2026, 02:31. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

7 rated outlets

  • The seven left-rated digests and two full reports led on Lemon’s argument that the charges stem from Trump’s animus toward him. Variety and the Washington Post’s digests both highlighted the claim that the indictment is politically motivated. Variety’s full report quoted Lemon’s lawyers stating the Justice Department acted on Trump’s animus by filing "unprecedented charges against a journalist for doing his job."
  • Variety also quoted Lemon’s lawyers describing Trump’s attacks on Lemon as "well documented, stretching back over a decade." The outlet included Lemon’s statement that the Justice Department sought to "embarrass" and "instill fear" in him. The Minnesota Reformer’s digest noted Lemon’s challenge to the constitutionality of the FACE Act, framing it as potentially having "far-reaching consequences" for the law.

Centre

14 rated outlets

  • The 14 centre-rated digests led on Lemon’s argument that the charges are a result of vindictive prosecution. KIFI’s full report, republished from CNN, quoted Lemon’s lawyers stating the charges violate the First Amendment and are motivated by Trump’s animus. The report described the charges as alleging Lemon was part of a "takeover-style attack" on the church, a phrase not used in the left-rated reports.
  • CBS News’s digest noted Trump’s animosity toward Lemon as "well documented," while UPI’s digest described the prosecution as "vindictive." The centre-rated digests uniformly carried the claim that the charges are politically motivated, but none included Lemon’s specific statements about the Justice Department’s intent to humiliate him or his challenge to the FACE Act’s constitutionality.

Right

7 rated outlets

  • All six right-rated digests report that Don Lemon has asked a federal judge to dismiss charges linked to a January protest at a St Paul church. The protest disrupted a service and targeted Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations. Lemon faces federal civil rights charges.
  • Five of the six digests lead on Lemon’s claim that the prosecution is politically motivated. They report his argument that the Justice Department acted on President Trump’s alleged animus toward him. The Epoch Times is the only digest that does not mention this claim.
  • None of the digests include Lemon’s statement that he was present only to document the protest. The term “mob invasion” appears in three digests: WND, ussanews.com, and OpsLens. NewsBusters refers to the event as an “anti-ICE attack”.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Federal judge asked to drop charges against Don Lemon over St Paul…?
Of the 28 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 25% are rated left, 50% are rated centre, 25% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 29. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Federal judge asked to drop charges against Don Lemon over St Paul… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 28 rated outlets on this story, 25% are rated left, 50% are rated centre, 25% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Federal judge asked to drop charges against Don Lemon over St Paul… biased?
Federal judge asked to drop charges against Don Lemon over St Paul church protest is one event reported by 29 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Federal judge asked to drop charges against Don Lemon over St Paul…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Federal judge asked to drop charges against Don Lemon over St Paul…?
29 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What charges does Don Lemon face?
Don Lemon faces federal criminal civil-rights charges under the FACE Act, which prohibits intimidation or interference with religious practice. The charges relate to his presence at an anti-ICE protest inside a St Paul church on 18 January 2026. Lemon has pleaded not guilty and argues the charges violate the First Amendment.
Why does Don Lemon say the charges are politically motivated?
Don Lemon’s lawyers argue the indictment stems from President Donald Trump’s longstanding animus toward Lemon. They claim the Justice Department acted on Trump’s hostility by filing charges against a journalist for reporting on the protest, which they describe as an effort to chill journalism disfavored by the President.
Which outlets covered the story and which did not?
Seven left-rated outlets and 14 centre-rated outlets ran the story, according to the reports below. No right-rated outlet covered it. The left emphasised Lemon’s challenge to the FACE Act’s constitutionality, while the centre led on the claim of vindictive prosecution.

Read it at the source

29 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

7

Centre

14
Show 6 more

Right

7

Not rated

1

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Don Lemon asks judge to drop protest charges | MediaBias News