Skip to the story
All stories

New book linking Hebrew punctuation to colonialism sparks criticism

A New Yorker review of a book on punctuation has drawn backlash online.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
New book linking Hebrew punctuation to colonialism sparks criticism

What this story says

  • A book review in The New Yorker has generated significant criticism online.
  • The review covers a new book titled “On the Mark: From Periods to Interrobangs, How Punctuation Remade the World”.
  • The book argues that European-style punctuation aided Hebrew's development into a spoken language and encouraged Jewish migration to Israel.
  • Commentators have criticised both the book's claims and The New Yorker's decision to review it.

Who covered it

Left 0%(0)Centre 0%(0)Right 100%(6)

Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

67/100

Hype

30/100

6 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

None of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

A review of a new book published by The New Yorker has led to online criticism. The book, “On the Mark: From Periods to Interrobangs, How Punctuation Remade the World”, posits that the introduction of European-style punctuation to Hebrew helped transform it into a modern spoken language. The book also suggests this development encouraged Jewish people to migrate to Israel.

The claims made in the book, as presented in The New Yorker's review, have sparked backlash. Several commentators have voiced their disapproval online, criticising both the book's central arguments and the magazine's platforming of the review.

Coverage

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mentioned the book's title, “On the Mark: From Periods to Interrobangs, How Punctuation Remade the World”. The specific arguments made by the book regarding how punctuation aided Hebrew's development into a spoken language were not detailed in these digests.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 4 times, most recently on 5 Oct 2026, 04:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated left has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Centre

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated centre has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Right

6 rated outlets

  • Six right-rated digests reported on the controversy surrounding The New Yorker's review of the book. These reports consistently highlighted that the book links Hebrew punctuation to colonialism and the history of Jewish migration to Israel. The New York Sun stated the book claims punctuation has fueled 'brutal oppression'. Wfmd.com, nytimespost.com, WVII / Fox Bangor, democraticaccent.com, and Fox News all noted that the book's claims have sparked criticism and that The New Yorker faced backlash or fury for publishing the review. Fox News also mentioned antisemitism tied to Israel's history of Jewish migration.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover New book linking Hebrew punctuation to colonialism sparks criticism?
Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 0% are rated left, 0% are rated centre, 100% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is New book linking Hebrew punctuation to colonialism sparks criticism left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of New book linking Hebrew punctuation to colonialism sparks criticism biased?
New book linking Hebrew punctuation to colonialism sparks criticism is one event reported by 6 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting New book linking Hebrew punctuation to colonialism sparks criticism?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered New book linking Hebrew punctuation to colonialism sparks criticism?
6 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is the new book about?
The book, titled “On the Mark: From Periods to Interrobangs, How Punctuation Remade the World”, argues that the addition of European-style punctuation to Hebrew helped it become a modern spoken language. It also suggests this encouraged Jewish people to move to Israel.
Why has the book review caused controversy?
The book review, published by The New Yorker, has drawn criticism because the book it covers links Hebrew punctuation to colonialism and Jewish migration to Israel. Commentators have expressed disapproval of these claims and The New Yorker's decision to publish the review.
Which outlets reported on this story?
The New York Sun, wfmd.com, nytimespost.com, WVII / Fox Bangor, democraticaccent.com, and Fox News all reported on the controversy surrounding the book review.

Read it at the source

6 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Hebrew Punctuation Book Criticized | MediaBias News