Skip to the story
All stories

Oprah Winfrey says Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz’s politics have nothing to do with her

The media mogul defended her decision to platform the two TV personalities, now Trump allies, on her show in the 1990s and 2000s

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Oprah Winfrey says Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz’s politics have nothing to do with her

What this story says

  • Oprah Winfrey introduced Dr. Phil McGraw as a weekly expert on her show in 1998 and Dr. Mehmet Oz as a medical expert in 2004.
  • Both men later became allies of Donald Trump, with McGraw serving on Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission and Oz leading Medicare & Medicaid Services in 2025.
  • Winfrey stated in an interview that their careers and political views have nothing to do with her, defending her original decision to platform them.
  • The left-rated outlets below led on Winfrey’s response, while the centre-rated digest carried the story without additional framing.

Who covered it

Left 65%(17)Centre 16%(4)Right 19%(5)

Percentages are shares of the 26 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 14 of the 40 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

55/100

Hype

35/100

40 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 5 of the 26 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

Oprah Winfrey has addressed criticism over her role in launching the careers of Dr. Phil McGraw and Dr. Mehmet Oz, two television personalities who later became allies of former US president Donald Trump. Winfrey featured McGraw, a psychologist who let his licence lapse two decades ago, as a weekly expert on her show starting in 1998. Oz, a physician with degrees from the University of Pennsylvania, began appearing as a medical expert in 2004.

Both men went on to host their own long-running programmes, *Dr. Phil* and *The Dr. Oz Show*, which outlasted Winfrey’s original talk show. McGraw now serves on Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission and has promoted MAGA initiatives through his conservative cable network, Merit Street Media. Oz was appointed to lead the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in 2025 and has supported Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Make America Healthy Again agenda.

In an interview with *Emmy Magazine*, Winfrey said the criticism she faces for platforming the pair is unrelated to her original reasons for featuring them. She stated, “Everybody has their own path in life, and it has not one thing to do with me, and I don’t have one thing to do with them.” Winfrey added that she believed both men had valuable information to share at the time, citing McGraw’s support during a 1997 lawsuit and Oz’s ability to explain medical topics in accessible terms.

What the coverage left out

No right-rated outlet ran this story at all. None of the digests or the full report mentioned that Winfrey’s interview with *Emmy Magazine* was published on 12 August 2026, or that she has not commented on McGraw or Oz’s political roles since their appointments in 2025. The unrated digest from *The Zambian Observer* included Winfrey’s defence but did not add new details.

Coverage settled. We checked this 74 times and stopped on 19 Aug 2026, 16:01. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

17 rated outlets

  • Left-rated outlets led on Oprah Winfrey’s statement that her decision to platform Dr. Phil McGraw and Dr. Mehmet Oz on her show had no connection to their later political views. All 12 reports carried her remark that their paths had “not one thing to do with me.”
  • The Independent’s full report included Winfrey’s explanation that she chose the two for their perceived expertise at the time: McGraw for practical advice and Oz for medical explanations. Eleven digests noted her defence of the original intent, quoting her words that she believed they had “valuable information to share.”
  • Outlets on this side reported the men’s current political roles: McGraw’s ties to Donald Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission and Merit Street Media, and Oz’s 2025 appointment to lead the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The Independent’s report also detailed past controversies, including McGraw’s COVID-19 comments and Oz’s support for Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s health agenda.
  • None of the digests mentioned Winfrey’s 1997 beef industry lawsuit or her friendship with Gayle King, though The Independent’s full report included both details.

Centre

4 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated digest from *Internewscast* carried the story without additional framing or quotes. It noted that Winfrey played a “pivotal role” in introducing McGraw and Oz but did not include her defence of her decision or details about their current political roles. The digest did not mention McGraw’s role on Trump’s commission, Oz’s appointment to Medicare & Medicaid Services, or Winfrey’s distancing of herself from their politics.

Right

5 rated outlets

  • The two right-rated digests agree that Oprah Winfrey defended her decision to launch the careers of Dr. Phil McGraw and Dr. Mehmet Oz. Both note she made the remarks in an interview with Emmy Magazine published on 11 August 2024.
  • The Washington Times digest leads on Winfrey’s defence of the two figures, stating she believed they offered valuable, practical information. TheMix.net digest focuses on her response to criticism over platforming them, without specifying the nature of that criticism.
  • Neither digest mentions Winfrey’s statement that the politics of Dr. Phil or Dr. Oz had no bearing on her decision. Both omit any reference to her views on their political positions.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Oprah Winfrey says Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz’s politics have nothing to do…?
Of the 26 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 65% are rated left, 16% are rated centre, 19% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 40. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Oprah Winfrey says Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz’s politics have nothing to do… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 26 rated outlets on this story, 65% are rated left, 16% are rated centre, 19% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Oprah Winfrey says Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz’s politics have nothing to do… biased?
Oprah Winfrey says Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz’s politics have nothing to do with her is one event reported by 40 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Oprah Winfrey says Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz’s politics have nothing to do…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Oprah Winfrey says Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz’s politics have nothing to do…?
40 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why did Oprah Winfrey feature Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz on her show?
Oprah Winfrey said she featured Dr. Phil McGraw and Dr. Mehmet Oz because she believed they had valuable information to share. She cited McGraw’s support during her 1997 lawsuit and Oz’s ability to explain medical topics in accessible terms as reasons for platforming them in the 1990s and 2000s.
What are Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz’s current political roles?
Dr. Phil McGraw serves on Donald Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission and promotes MAGA initiatives through his conservative cable network, Merit Street Media. Dr. Mehmet Oz was appointed to lead the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in 2025 and has supported Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Make America Healthy Again agenda.
Which outlets covered Oprah Winfrey’s response to criticism?
Four left-rated outlets and one centre-rated outlet carried the story. The left-rated reports included *The Independent*, *theGrio*, and *Raw Story*, while the centre-rated digest was from *Internewscast*. No right-rated outlet ran the story.

Read it at the source

40 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

17
Show 9 more

Centre

4

Right

5

Not rated

14
Show 6 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Oprah Winfrey defends featuring Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz amid Trump ties | MediaBias News