Activists protest Bill C-39 outside MP Sukh Dhaliwal's office
Concerns raised over potential impacts on Indigenous rights, environmental law, and labour rights.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Activists protest Bill C-39 outside MP Sukh Dhaliwal's office
Photograph: Penticton Western News (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Activists protested Bill C-39 outside Surrey-Newton MP Sukh Dhaliwal's office on November 12.
- The protest was part of a national day of action coordinated by 350Canada and local groups.
- Concerns include potential infringements on Indigenous rights, environmental law, and labour rights.
- The government states Bill C-39 aims to streamline federal approval processes for major economic projects to one year.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 12 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .
Trust
48/100
Craft
60/100
Hype
20/100
12 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
None of the 12 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Activists gathered outside the office of Surrey-Newton MP Sukh Dhaliwal on November 12 to protest Bill C-39, also known as the Build Canada Strong Act, as a final vote approached. The demonstration was part of a National Day of Action organized by 350Canada and other groups. Protesters expressed concerns that the legislation could negatively affect Indigenous rights, environmental laws, and labour rights.
According to the Government of Canada, Bill C-39 is intended to strengthen the economy by modernizing federal labour relations and streamlining the approval process for major economic projects from over five years to one year. Nolen Scott, a BC Greens candidate, stated that the bill is geared towards corporations and billionaires rather than community needs like affordable housing. Scott also argued that the legislation could weaken environmental protections and increase benefits for oil and gas stakeholders.
Shiva Olyaei, a professor of policy study at KPU, stated that the measures in Bill C-39 risk shifting power away from First Nations, workers, and affected communities. The Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs (UBCIC) also expressed concerns in a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney on October 13, noting a lack of consultation and cooperation from the federal government. The UBCIC stated that the one-year review process is insufficient for major projects and called for a pause on the bill's development to allow for direct work with First Nations.
MP Sukh Dhaliwal met with protesters for a closed-door discussion. He stated that Bill C-39 is not removing the right to strike but modernizing labour law for expediency. Dhaliwal also asserted that Indigenous rights are protected and that Indigenous people have been consulted. Protesters reported that Dhaliwal did not commit to voting against the bill.
Coverage comparison
What the coverage left out
None of the left-rated reports mentioned the specific number of rallies held across the country on the National Day of Action, although 350Canada stated it was 65. The digests did not include the detail that MP Sukh Dhaliwal was the vice-chair of the special joint committee related to the foundation of Bill C-39. No centre- or right-rated outlet ran this story.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 19 times, most recently on 14 Nov 2026, 02:00, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
12 rated outlets
- The left-rated reports focused on the activists' concerns regarding Bill C-39's potential impact on Indigenous rights, environmental law, and labour rights. They highlighted statements from Nolen Scott, who described the bill as favouring corporations and weakening environmental protections, and Shiva Olyaei, who warned of a power shift away from First Nations and workers. The reports also detailed the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs' concerns about a lack of consultation and the inadequacy of the proposed one-year review period for major projects. The full reports from Penticton Western News and Terrace Standard included direct quotes from Scott, Olyaei, Dhaliwal, and the UBCIC, as well as details about the protest and the MP's response. The digests from the other left-rated outlets summarized these key concerns.
Centre
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated centre has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Right
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Activists protest Bill C-39 outside MP Sukh Dhaliwal's office?
- Of the 12 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 100% are rated left, 0% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Activists protest Bill C-39 outside MP Sukh Dhaliwal's office left or right?
- The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 100% of the 12 rated outlets on it are rated left — so far this is a story carried mostly by the left. Coverage is still arriving and that can change, which is why the figure is dated rather than fixed.
- Is the coverage of Activists protest Bill C-39 outside MP Sukh Dhaliwal's office biased?
- Activists protest Bill C-39 outside MP Sukh Dhaliwal's office is one event reported by 12 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Activists protest Bill C-39 outside MP Sukh Dhaliwal's office?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Activists protest Bill C-39 outside MP Sukh Dhaliwal's office?
- 12 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What is Bill C-39?
- Bill C-39, also known as the Build Canada Strong Act, is legislation proposed by the Government of Canada. The government states it aims to streamline federal approval processes for major economic projects to one year and modernize the federal labour relations framework. Activists are concerned it could infringe on Indigenous rights, environmental law, and labour rights.
- Why did activists protest outside MP Sukh Dhaliwal's office?
- Activists rallied outside MP Sukh Dhaliwal's office on November 12 to protest Bill C-39. They are concerned the legislation will weaken environmental protections, infringe on Indigenous rights, and negatively impact labour rights. They urged him to reject the bill as a final vote neared.
- What are the government's stated reasons for Bill C-39?
- The Government of Canada states that Bill C-39 is intended to strengthen the Canadian economy. Its stated aims include modernizing the federal labour relations framework and streamlining the federal approval process for major economic projects, reducing the timeline from over five years to one year.
Read it at the source
12 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
12- B.C. activists rally in Surrey to protest Build Canada Strong Act (opens crestonvalleyadvance.ca in a new tab)
crestonvalleyadvance.ca — is crestonvalleyadvance.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. activists rally in Surrey to protest Build Canada Strong Act - Fort St. James Caledonia Courier (opens Caledonia Courier in a new tab)
Caledonia Courier — is Caledonia Courier biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. activists rally in Surrey to protest Build Canada Strong Act (opens grandforksgazette.ca in a new tab)
grandforksgazette.ca — is grandforksgazette.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. activists rally in Surrey to protest Build Canada Strong Act - Vanderhoof Omineca Express (opens ominecaexpress.com in a new tab)
ominecaexpress.com — is ominecaexpress.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. activists rally in Surrey to protest Build Canada Strong Act (opens Houston Today in a new tab)
Houston Today — is Houston Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. activists rally in Surrey to protest Build Canada Strong Act (opens Peninsula News Review in a new tab)
Peninsula News Review — is Peninsula News Review biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. activists rally in Surrey to protest Build Canada Strong Act (opens The Free Press in a new tab)
The Free Press — is The Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. activists rally in Surrey to protest Build Canada Strong Act - Northern Sentinel (opens Kitimat Northern Sentinel in a new tab)
Kitimat Northern Sentinel — is Kitimat Northern Sentinel biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 4 more
- B.C. activists rally in Surrey to protest Build Canada Strong Act - The Interior News - Smithers BC (opens Smithers Interior News in a new tab)
Smithers Interior News — is Smithers Interior News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. activists rally in Surrey to protest Build Canada Strong Act (opens Sooke News Mirror in a new tab)
Sooke News Mirror — is Sooke News Mirror biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. activists rally in Surrey to protest Build Canada Strong Act (opens Terrace Standard in a new tab)
Terrace Standard — is Terrace Standard biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. activists rally in Surrey to protest Build Canada Strong Act (opens Penticton Western News in a new tab)
Penticton Western News — is Penticton Western News biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Right
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


