Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor remains on UK royal funeral list despite stripped titles
Government sources confirm the disgraced former prince is still entitled to a ceremonial send-off under long-term plans
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

The revelations have sparked outrage from lawyers of Jeffrey Epstein victims (Picture: STEVE PARSONS/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Photograph: Metro News (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is still on a confidential government list for a royal ceremonial funeral, despite losing his titles in 2025 over his association with Jeffrey Epstein.
- The list is part of the UK government’s long-term 'bridge' plans for royal funerals, which are prepared years in advance and updated as circumstances change.
- US lawyer Gloria Allred and UK politicians have questioned why taxpayers should fund the funeral of a private citizen, while royal experts speculate on the venue and burial site.
- The Cabinet Office and Buckingham Palace have declined to comment on the reports.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 27 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 7 of the 34 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
29/100
Craft
95/100
Hype
45/100
34 sources · methodology
Missing from the left
Only 7 of the 27 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.
A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor remains on a confidential government list that entitles him to a royal ceremonial funeral, despite being stripped of his royal titles in November 2025. Senior Whitehall sources told the *Mail on Sunday* that the list is part of the UK government’s long-term contingency plans, known as 'bridge' plans, which prepare for the deaths of senior members of the royal family. These plans are updated as circumstances change and were used for the funerals of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip.
Mountbatten-Windsor, who served in the Royal Navy and was honorary colonel of several regiments, lost his military titles and royal patronages following revelations about his friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. King Charles removed his HRH style and prince title in 2025. Despite this, the former Duke of York is still included in the funeral arrangements, which royal experts say could take place at St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle. The planned burial site is the Royal Burial Ground at Frogmore in Windsor’s Home Park.
The reports have drawn criticism from figures including US lawyer Gloria Allred, who represents 27 of Epstein’s victims. Allred questioned why UK taxpayers should fund the funeral of a private citizen, asking what message it would send to Epstein’s victims. Alicia Kearns, a Conservative shadow Home Office minister, said there were 'no circumstances' under which Mountbatten-Windsor should receive a royal funeral. The Cabinet Office and Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the reports.
What the coverage left out
None of the right-rated digests mentioned the cost of a royal ceremonial funeral or cited the finance ministry’s estimates. The *Metro News* and *PerthNow* reports were the only ones to quote Alicia Kearns’ call for the plans to be revoked. The *Metro News* report alone included the perspective of a retired Royal Navy officer on pallbearers.
“Under these circumstances, the question arises as to why this man should be afforded the honour of a royal funeral. What kind of message would such a ceremony send to Epstein’s victims?”
Coverage settled. We checked this 64 times and stopped on 14 Aug 2026, 11:16. The figures above are what it finished at.
How other outlets pictured it
Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
7 rated outlets
- The *Metro News* report led on the contradiction between Mountbatten-Windsor’s stripped titles and his continued inclusion on the funeral list. It quoted US lawyers Gloria Allred and Spencer Kuvin, who argued that taxpayers should not fund the funeral of a private individual. The report also included criticism from Conservative MP Alicia Kearns, who called for the plans to be revoked. It noted that Mountbatten-Windsor’s military service could still entitle him to pallbearers from the Royal Navy, citing a retired rear admiral who said he would volunteer.
Centre
7 rated outlets
- The *PerthNow* report framed the story as a 'shock' revelation, emphasising that Mountbatten-Windsor’s inclusion on the list came despite his removal from the royal family’s working ranks. It quoted Gloria Allred’s criticism of the plans and included Alicia Kearns’ call for the arrangements to be abandoned. The report also provided context on the 'bridge' plans, explaining how they are used for royal funerals and noting that Mountbatten-Windsor’s arrangements would have been subject to revision after his removal as a working royal.
- The *Internewscast* digest led with public 'outrage' over the funeral plans, though it did not specify whose voices were quoted. It described Mountbatten-Windsor’s continued entitlement to a royal funeral as contentious amid the ongoing scandal.
Right
13 rated outlets
- The right-rated digests uniformly framed the story as a source of public 'fury' or 'uproar'. The *GB News* digest described Mountbatten-Windsor as still being 'in line for a full royal ceremonial funeral' despite his stripped titles, while the *Daily Express* led with 'Fury as shamed Andrew
- remains on list for huge royal honour'. The *Protothema* digest posed the question of why taxpayers should pay for the funeral, echoing the criticism from Allred. The *7NEWS Australia* and *The West Australian* digests both described the plans as a 'disgrace' and highlighted Mountbatten-Windsor’s 'dramatic fall from grace'. None of the right-rated digests mentioned the specific venue or burial site, nor did they quote Alicia Kearns or the retired rear admiral.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor remains on UK royal funeral list despite…?
- Of the 27 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 26% are rated left, 26% are rated centre, 48% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 34. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor remains on UK royal funeral list despite… left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 27 rated outlets on this story, 26% are rated left, 26% are rated centre, 48% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor remains on UK royal funeral list despite… biased?
- Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor remains on UK royal funeral list despite stripped titles is one event reported by 34 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor remains on UK royal funeral list despite…?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor remains on UK royal funeral list despite…?
- 34 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- Why is Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor still entitled to a royal funeral?
- Senior Whitehall sources say he remains on a confidential government list for royal ceremonial funerals, part of the UK’s long-term 'bridge' plans. These plans are prepared years in advance and updated as circumstances change, but his inclusion has drawn criticism due to his stripped titles and association with Jeffrey Epstein.
- Who has criticised the funeral plans?
- US lawyer Gloria Allred, who represents 27 of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, questioned why UK taxpayers should fund the funeral. Conservative MP Alicia Kearns called for the plans to be revoked, saying there were 'no circumstances' under which Mountbatten-Windsor should receive a royal funeral.
- Where would the funeral take place?
- Royal experts speculate the funeral could be held at St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle, the same venue used for Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip. The planned burial site is the Royal Burial Ground at Frogmore in Windsor’s Home Park, a private cemetery for members of the royal family.
Read it at the source
34 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
7- Prince Andrew Still Has a Royal Funeral Plan Despite Losing His Titles: What Is 'Bridge Plan'? (opens IBTimes Singapore in a new tab)
IBTimes Singapore — is IBTimes Singapore biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Despite Entanglement in Epstein Scandal: Andrew Is to Receive Royal Burial (opens watson in a new tab)
- Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Still Set for Royal Funeral Despite Losing All Royal Titles (opens IBTimes UK in a new tab)
IBTimes UK — is IBTimes UK biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Titleless Prince, Royal Tomb: Andrew's Secret Burial Plans Revealed (opens t-online in a new tab)
- Andrew could receive high-profile royal funeral despite Epstein scandal (opens Stuff in a new tab)
- Andrew to receive royal funeral despite being stripped of titles (opens Metro News in a new tab)
Metro News — is Metro News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor: "Schande Für Die Krone" - Vortex Around Planned State Funeral for the Ex-Prince (opens News.de in a new tab)
News.de — is News.de biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
Centre
7- Is Andrew Buried Royally Despite the Epstein Scandal? (opens mannheim24.de in a new tab)
mannheim24.de — is mannheim24.de biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Is Andrew Buried Royally Despite the Epstein Scandal? (opens merkur.de in a new tab)
- Disgraced Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Still Set to Receive Royal Ceremonial Funeral Despite Being Stripped of All Titles (opens RadarOnline in a new tab)
RadarOnline — is RadarOnline biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Andrew is still due to receive a royal funeral - here's who could stop it (opens iNews in a new tab)
- Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor 'to receive royal funeral' (opens Evening Standard in a new tab)
Evening Standard — is Evening Standard biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Andrew’s shock place on secret royal funeral list revealed (opens PerthNow in a new tab)
- Outrage Grows Over Royal Funeral Plans for Prince Andrew Amid Scandal (opens Internewscast in a new tab)
Internewscast — is Internewscast biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
13- Prince Andrew's Funeral: New Details (opens Korrespondent.net in a new tab)
Korrespondent.net — is Korrespondent.net biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Prince Andrew's Privilege that Outrages Britons: His Royal Funeral Is Still on the Government's Secret Plans (opens ESdiario in a new tab)
- Indignation in the UK: Andrew Remains on Secret List for Significant Royal Honor (opens Kurier in a new tab)
- Special Treatment for Ex-Princes?: Plans for Andrew's Funeral Cause Indignation (opens n-tv in a new tab)
- Victims' Anger at Funeral Plans (opens Expressen in a new tab)
- "Blamage for the Crown: Ex-Prince Andrew Has No More Titles, but Is to Get Royal Burial (opens focus.de in a new tab)
- Shamed ex-Prince Andrew 'on secret list for royal honour' when he finally dies (opens Daily Star in a new tab)
Daily Star — is Daily Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor 'still in line for full royal ceremonial funeral' despite being stripped of titles (opens GB News in a new tab)
Show 5 more
- Andrew: Despite Epstein Scandal Intended for Royal Burial (opens Bild in a new tab)
- Fury as shamed Andrew 'remains on list for huge royal honour' (opens Daily Express in a new tab)
Daily Express — is Daily Express biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Britain: Royal Funeral for Prince Andrew Despite His Abdication, Reactions over the "Secret Plan" (opens Protothema in a new tab)
Protothema — is Protothema biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Andrew’s shock place on secret royal funeral list revealed (opens The West Australian in a new tab)
The West Australian — is The West Australian biased? Our profile of this outlet
- ‘Disgrace’: Uproar as Andrew’s latest entitlements revealed (opens 7NEWS Australia in a new tab)
7NEWS Australia — is 7NEWS Australia biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
Not rated
7- Princess Anne falls victim to 'preposterous' system once again - and it's got this royal expert suggesting radical change (opens woman&home in a new tab)
woman&home — is woman&home biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor May Be Entitled to a Royal Funeral Despite the Stripping of His Royal Titles. (opens vanityfair.fr in a new tab)
vanityfair.fr — is vanityfair.fr biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Former Prince Andrew: Why Will He Be Entitled to a Royal Funeral Despite the Loss of His Titles? (opens closermag.fr in a new tab)
closermag.fr — is closermag.fr biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Despite the Lack of Titles. Ex-Prince Andrew Will Be Buried with Royal Honours when the Time Comes (opens Новое Время in a new tab)
Новое Время
- Prince Andrew’s State Funeral Would Be Maintained According to the British Government’s Plan (opens Moncloa in a new tab)
- Is Andrew Buried Royally Despite the Epstein Scandal? (opens Promiflash.de in a new tab)
Promiflash.de — is Promiflash.de biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Royal Funeral Despite Title Withdrawal? (opens gala.de in a new tab)
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


