Skip to the story
All stories

Anthony Fauci's lawyers establish defense fund for pandemic probes

Fund will cover legal costs for the former infectious disease expert facing state and federal investigations.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Dr. Anthony Fauci waits for the start of a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on July 29, 2026.

What this story says

  • Lawyers for Dr. Anthony Fauci have launched a legal defense fund.
  • The fund is intended to cover costs associated with state and federal investigations into his pandemic response.
  • Fauci's legal team states he has done nothing wrong and is prepared to contest the actions.
  • Any money remaining in the fund after legal expenses will be donated to charity.

Who covered it

Left 4%(1)Centre 25%(7)Right 71%(20)

Percentages are shares of the 28 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 5 of the 33 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

70/100

Craft

71/100

Hype

20/100

33 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 1 of the 28 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

Lawyers for Dr. Anthony Fauci have established a legal defense fund to respond to a growing number of state and federal investigations concerning his management of the COVID-19 pandemic. His legal team stated that Fauci denies any wrongdoing and is prepared to fight the actions against him. According to his lawyers, Fauci will not receive any personal benefit from the fund, and any remaining money will be distributed to charitable causes.

Disagreement on pardon

HuffPost reported that then-President Joe Biden issued a preemptive pardon to Fauci in January 2025. The report states this occurred amid accusations from Republican lawmakers regarding his role in research and attempts to cover up the pandemic's origins, claims that HuffPost noted have not been independently substantiated. None of the other reports mention a pardon.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mention the preemptive pardon issued to Anthony Fauci in January 2025, which was reported by HuffPost. The centre-rated digests also do not mention this pardon.

Coverage settled. We checked this 174 times and stopped on 27 Aug 2026, 05:00. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

1 rated outlet

  • HuffPost's full report led on the establishment of the legal defense fund and the reasons for it, stating it was needed to respond to a growing number of state and federal investigations. The report quoted David Schertler, counsel to Fauci, who said Dr. Fauci is facing an "unprecedented legal barrage for a retired civil servant" and deserves a "robust defense against these unfounded and frivolous actions." HuffPost also detailed a January 2025 preemptive pardon issued to Fauci by President Joe Biden, noting that claims against him have not been independently substantiated. The report mentioned that three state attorneys general have launched probes, with Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier issuing a subpoena.

Centre

7 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports from WTVB, Reuters, and The Mighty 790 KFGO all led with the establishment of the legal defense fund for Anthony Fauci. They stated the fund is necessary due to a growing number of state and federal investigations related to his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, which they noted will require substantial resources. These digests did not include specific details about the nature of the investigations or any legal figures involved.

Right

20 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports from Fox News, The Straits Times, and wmbdradio.com focused on the creation of the legal defense fund for Anthony Fauci. They highlighted that the fund is being set up as federal and state investigations multiply against him concerning his role during the COVID-19 pandemic. These digests did not provide further details on the investigations or quote any legal representatives.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Anthony Fauci's lawyers establish defense fund for pandemic probes?
Of the 28 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 4% are rated left, 25% are rated centre, 71% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 33. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Anthony Fauci's lawyers establish defense fund for pandemic probes left or right?
The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 71% of the 28 rated outlets on it are rated right — so far this is a story carried mostly by the right. Coverage of this one has settled, so that is unlikely to move much now.
Is the coverage of Anthony Fauci's lawyers establish defense fund for pandemic probes biased?
Anthony Fauci's lawyers establish defense fund for pandemic probes is one event reported by 33 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Anthony Fauci's lawyers establish defense fund for pandemic probes?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Anthony Fauci's lawyers establish defense fund for pandemic probes?
33 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why has Anthony Fauci's legal defense fund been established?
The fund was established by lawyers for Dr. Anthony Fauci to address the increasing number of state and federal investigations into his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. His legal team stated that these probes require substantial resources to respond to.
What is the purpose of the legal defense fund?
The fund is intended to cover the legal costs associated with the state and federal investigations into Dr. Anthony Fauci's pandemic response. His lawyers have asserted that he has done nothing wrong and is prepared to contest the actions.
Will Anthony Fauci personally benefit from the fund?
No, according to his lawyers, Anthony Fauci will not receive any payment or personal benefit from the legal defense fund. Any remaining funds after all legal expenses are concluded will be distributed to charity.

Read it at the source

33 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

1

Centre

7

Right

20
Show 12 more

Not rated

5

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Fauci Defense Fund | MediaBias News