Skip to the story
All stories

BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out of context

Remarks made at a debate drew condemnation from Indigenous leaders and political opponents.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Mike Hicks is the B.C. Conservative candidate for Juan de Fuca-Malahat. (Conservative Party of B.C.)

What this story says

  • Mike Hicks, Conservative candidate for Juan de Fuca-Malahat, stated at an Oct 9 debate that "First Nations have to be conquered."
  • Hicks later issued a statement claiming the video was taken out of context and he was advocating for modern treaty negotiations.
  • The First Nations Leadership Council condemned Hicks' remarks as racist and invoking a history of colonialism.
  • BC NDP leader David Eby, BC Green leader Emily Lowan, and Conservative leader Lorne Doerkson publicly responded to the comments.

Who covered it

Left 87%(13)Centre 13%(2)Right 0%(0)

Percentages are shares of the 15 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 3 of the 18 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

70/100

Craft

100/100

Hype

15/100

18 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

None of the 15 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Conservative candidate Mike Hicks made remarks at an Oct 9 debate in Mill Bay, stating, "First Nations have to be conquered." A portion of the exchange was shared on social media. Hicks was speaking at an all-candidates meeting for the Juan de Fuca-Malahat riding.

Following the circulation of the video clip, Hicks issued a statement asserting the comments were taken out of context. He explained he was discussing historical context and advocating for the development of modern treaties. The First Nations Leadership Council, comprising the B.C. Assembly of First Nations, First Nations Summit, and Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, issued a news release condemning the remarks as "deeply racist" and invoking a "violent history of colonialism."

BC NDP leader David Eby described the comments as "extremism" and part of the "chaos of the Conservatives." BC Green leader Emily Lowan called for Conservative leader Lorne Doerkson to remove Hicks as a candidate. Doerkson stated he was not aware of the specific comment but that it "sounds pretty offensive."

Disagreement on context

Mike Hicks said the clip was taken out of context and he was advocating for modern treaty negotiations, according to CBC News and Chek News. Chek News also reported that T’Sou-ke Coun. Debra Lazzar, who shared the video, called the comments "profoundly offensive and deeply concerning," stating that Indigenous rights are not "red tape."

What the coverage left out

None of the 18 reports printed below mention the date of the debate as October 9, 2026, or the location as Mill Bay, British Columbia. The unrated digest from Island Social Trends mentions the date as October 9 and the location as Mill Bay, but does not specify the year.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 17 Oct 2026, 02:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out of context
Chek newsCentre
BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out of context
Burns Lake Lakes District NewsLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

13 rated outlets

  • Thirteen left-rated reports led on the condemnation of Mike Hicks' remarks by Indigenous leaders and political figures. These reports highlighted that the First Nations Leadership Council called the comments "deeply racist" and invoked a "violent history of colonialism." They also noted that BC NDP leader David Eby called the remarks "extremism" and BC Green leader Emily Lowan called for Hicks' removal as a candidate. Several left-rated digests, including those from Burns Lake Lakes District News, Penticton Western News, and Smithers Interior News, used the headline "B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context."

Centre

2 rated outlets

  • Two centre-rated reports focused on the criticism directed at Mike Hicks' statement. Chek News, a full report, highlighted that the comment drew criticism from a T’Sou-ke councillor and was addressed by BC NDP leader David Eby and BC Green leader Emily Lowan. Indo-Canadian Voice, a digest, reported that BC Green Leader Emily Lowan was calling on BC Conservative Leader Lorne Doerkson to remove Hicks as a candidate following his remarks.

Right

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out…?
Of the 15 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 87% are rated left, 13% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 18. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out… left or right?
The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 87% of the 15 rated outlets on it are rated left — so far this is a story carried mostly by the left. Coverage is still arriving and that can change, which is why the figure is dated rather than fixed.
Is the coverage of BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out… biased?
BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out of context is one event reported by 18 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out…?
18 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did BC candidate Mike Hicks say about First Nations?
At an Oct 9 debate, Mike Hicks, Conservative candidate for Juan de Fuca-Malahat, said "First Nations have to be conquered." He later stated this was taken out of context and he was advocating for modern treaty negotiations.
How did Indigenous leaders and politicians react to Hicks' comments?
The First Nations Leadership Council condemned the remarks as "deeply racist." BC NDP leader David Eby called them "extremism," and BC Green leader Emily Lowan called for Hicks' removal as a candidate. Conservative leader Lorne Doerkson found the comment "offensive."
Did Mike Hicks apologise for his remarks?
Mike Hicks issued a statement saying the video clip was taken out of context. He explained he was discussing historical context and making a case for developing modern treaties, rather than defending past actions.

Read it at the source

18 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

13
Show 5 more

Centre

2

Right

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Not rated

3

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Mike Hicks' debate remarks | MediaBias News