BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out of context
Remarks made at a debate drew condemnation from Indigenous leaders and political opponents.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Mike Hicks is the B.C. Conservative candidate for Juan de Fuca-Malahat. (Conservative Party of B.C.)
Photograph: CBC News (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Mike Hicks, Conservative candidate for Juan de Fuca-Malahat, stated at an Oct 9 debate that "First Nations have to be conquered."
- Hicks later issued a statement claiming the video was taken out of context and he was advocating for modern treaty negotiations.
- The First Nations Leadership Council condemned Hicks' remarks as racist and invoking a history of colonialism.
- BC NDP leader David Eby, BC Green leader Emily Lowan, and Conservative leader Lorne Doerkson publicly responded to the comments.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 15 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 3 of the 18 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
70/100
Craft
100/100
Hype
15/100
18 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
None of the 15 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Conservative candidate Mike Hicks made remarks at an Oct 9 debate in Mill Bay, stating, "First Nations have to be conquered." A portion of the exchange was shared on social media. Hicks was speaking at an all-candidates meeting for the Juan de Fuca-Malahat riding.
Following the circulation of the video clip, Hicks issued a statement asserting the comments were taken out of context. He explained he was discussing historical context and advocating for the development of modern treaties. The First Nations Leadership Council, comprising the B.C. Assembly of First Nations, First Nations Summit, and Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, issued a news release condemning the remarks as "deeply racist" and invoking a "violent history of colonialism."
BC NDP leader David Eby described the comments as "extremism" and part of the "chaos of the Conservatives." BC Green leader Emily Lowan called for Conservative leader Lorne Doerkson to remove Hicks as a candidate. Doerkson stated he was not aware of the specific comment but that it "sounds pretty offensive."
Disagreement on context
Mike Hicks said the clip was taken out of context and he was advocating for modern treaty negotiations, according to CBC News and Chek News. Chek News also reported that T’Sou-ke Coun. Debra Lazzar, who shared the video, called the comments "profoundly offensive and deeply concerning," stating that Indigenous rights are not "red tape."
What the coverage left out
None of the 18 reports printed below mention the date of the debate as October 9, 2026, or the location as Mill Bay, British Columbia. The unrated digest from Island Social Trends mentions the date as October 9 and the location as Mill Bay, but does not specify the year.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 17 Oct 2026, 02:30, and will add the sides that appear.
How other outlets pictured it
Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out of context
Chek news — embedded from source

BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out of context
Burns Lake Lakes District News — embedded from source
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
13 rated outlets
- Thirteen left-rated reports led on the condemnation of Mike Hicks' remarks by Indigenous leaders and political figures. These reports highlighted that the First Nations Leadership Council called the comments "deeply racist" and invoked a "violent history of colonialism." They also noted that BC NDP leader David Eby called the remarks "extremism" and BC Green leader Emily Lowan called for Hicks' removal as a candidate. Several left-rated digests, including those from Burns Lake Lakes District News, Penticton Western News, and Smithers Interior News, used the headline "B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context."
Centre
2 rated outlets
- Two centre-rated reports focused on the criticism directed at Mike Hicks' statement. Chek News, a full report, highlighted that the comment drew criticism from a T’Sou-ke councillor and was addressed by BC NDP leader David Eby and BC Green leader Emily Lowan. Indo-Canadian Voice, a digest, reported that BC Green Leader Emily Lowan was calling on BC Conservative Leader Lorne Doerkson to remove Hicks as a candidate following his remarks.
Right
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out…?
- Of the 15 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 87% are rated left, 13% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 18. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out… left or right?
- The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 87% of the 15 rated outlets on it are rated left — so far this is a story carried mostly by the left. Coverage is still arriving and that can change, which is why the figure is dated rather than fixed.
- Is the coverage of BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out… biased?
- BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out of context is one event reported by 18 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out…?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered BC candidate Mike Hicks says First Nations 'conquered' comment was out…?
- 18 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What did BC candidate Mike Hicks say about First Nations?
- At an Oct 9 debate, Mike Hicks, Conservative candidate for Juan de Fuca-Malahat, said "First Nations have to be conquered." He later stated this was taken out of context and he was advocating for modern treaty negotiations.
- How did Indigenous leaders and politicians react to Hicks' comments?
- The First Nations Leadership Council condemned the remarks as "deeply racist." BC NDP leader David Eby called them "extremism," and BC Green leader Emily Lowan called for Hicks' removal as a candidate. Conservative leader Lorne Doerkson found the comment "offensive."
- Did Mike Hicks apologise for his remarks?
- Mike Hicks issued a statement saying the video clip was taken out of context. He explained he was discussing historical context and making a case for developing modern treaties, rather than defending past actions.
Read it at the source
18 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
13- Indigenous leaders condemn Conservative candidate's comments about First Nations being 'conquered' (opens CBC News in a new tab)
- B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context (opens crestonvalleyadvance.ca in a new tab)
crestonvalleyadvance.ca — is crestonvalleyadvance.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context - Fort St. James Caledonia Courier (opens Caledonia Courier in a new tab)
Caledonia Courier — is Caledonia Courier biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context (opens grandforksgazette.ca in a new tab)
grandforksgazette.ca — is grandforksgazette.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context - Vanderhoof Omineca Express (opens ominecaexpress.com in a new tab)
ominecaexpress.com — is ominecaexpress.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context (opens Houston Today in a new tab)
Houston Today — is Houston Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context: Juan de Fuca-Malahat candidate (opens Peninsula News Review in a new tab)
Peninsula News Review — is Peninsula News Review biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context (opens The Free Press in a new tab)
The Free Press — is The Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 5 more
- B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context - Northern Sentinel (opens Kitimat Northern Sentinel in a new tab)
Kitimat Northern Sentinel — is Kitimat Northern Sentinel biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context - The Interior News - Smithers BC (opens Smithers Interior News in a new tab)
Smithers Interior News — is Smithers Interior News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context: Juan de Fuca-Malahat candidate (opens Sooke News Mirror in a new tab)
Sooke News Mirror — is Sooke News Mirror biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context (opens Penticton Western News in a new tab)
Penticton Western News — is Penticton Western News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context (opens Burns Lake Lakes District News in a new tab)
Centre
2- BC Greens to Doerkson: Remove Conservative candidate who said First Nations “have to be conquered” (opens Indo-Canadian Voice in a new tab)
Indo-Canadian Voice — is Indo-Canadian Voice biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- 'First Nations have to be conquered' comment by South Island Conservative candidate draws criticism (opens Chek news in a new tab)
Right
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Not rated
3- BC Conservative JDF-Malahat candidate Mike Hicks on his First Nations comment (opens Island Social Trends in a new tab)
Island Social Trends — is Island Social Trends biased? Our profile of this outlet
- B.C. Conservative candidate says First Nations 'conquered' comment taken out of context (opens Today In BC in a new tab)
Today In BC — is Today In BC biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FNLC CONDEMNS RACIST REMARKS BY BC CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE CALLING FOR FIRST NATIONS TO BE "CONQUERED" (opens Newswire in a new tab)
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

