California craft distillers lose delivery rights as lobbying blocks extension
Temporary pandemic-era rules allowing direct-to-consumer shipments expire on 31 December after opposition from wine industry and Teamsters
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

California craft distillers lose delivery rights as lobbying blocks extension
Photograph: KPBS (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Temporary rules allowing California craft distillers to ship spirits directly to customers expire on 31 December 2026.
- Opposition from the wine industry, Teamsters and alcohol distributors blocked a legislative extension, despite no formal votes against it.
- The groups opposing the measure spent over $1 million lobbying the California Legislature this year.
- Craft distillers, defined as producers of up to 150,000 gallons annually, say the lobbying effort directly thwarted their efforts.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 8 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 3 of the 11 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
48/100
Craft
95/100
Hype
35/100
11 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
None of the 8 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
For six years, Californians have been able to order craft spirits for home delivery under temporary rules introduced during the pandemic. Those rules, which allow distillers producing up to 150,000 gallons a year to ship directly to customers, expire on 31 December 2026. Assemblymember Josh Hoover, a Republican from Folsom, attempted to make the rules permanent by amending one of his bills, but the effort failed after opposition from the wine industry, Teamsters union and corporate alcohol distributors.
The groups opposing the extension spent more than $1 million lobbying the California Legislature this year, according to reports filed with the state secretary of state. They have also donated at least $11 million to California politicians over the years. Craft distillers, who have spent far less on lobbying, say the opposition’s spending effectively killed their proposal. Cris Steller, acting executive director of the California Distillers Association, said the groups opposing the measure went directly to lawmakers’ offices to block it.
Opponents of the extension argue that allowing direct shipments weakens safeguards, including preventing alcohol deliveries to minors. Teamsters lobbyist Matt Broad said the union supports direct shipments but wants distillers to use established shipping companies with unionised drivers. The wine industry, which has been allowed to ship directly to customers for decades, has also expressed concerns about extending the same rights to distillers.
What the coverage left out
No right-rated outlet ran this story at all. None of the digests or reports mentioned the specific amount craft distillers spent on lobbying, or whether they proposed alternative safeguards for alcohol deliveries. The Washington Top News report noted that breweries are prohibited from shipping directly to customers, but none of the digests included this detail.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 4 times, most recently on 7 Aug 2026, 22:45, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
4 rated outlets
- The four left-rated reports led on the role of lobbying and the financial disparity between craft distillers and their opponents. The Associated Press and Toronto Star digests both highlighted the $1 million spent by opposition groups this year, and the $11 million donated to politicians over time. Cal Matters’ digest named the wine industry, Teamsters and alcohol distributors as the groups blocking the extension.
- The Associated Press full report quoted Cris Steller, who said the opposition’s lobbying "torpedoed any effort we came up with." It also noted that the fight illustrates how decisions are made in Sacramento, where powerful interests shape policy in secret negotiations. The report described the opposition’s arguments but did not lead with them.
Centre
4 rated outlets
- The four centre-rated digests focused on the impending expiration of the delivery rules and the opposition’s role in blocking an extension. KPBS and Danville San Ramon led with the 31 December deadline and named the wine industry, Teamsters and alcohol distributors as the groups responsible. The Washington Top News full report provided the most detail, including the Teamsters’ argument that distillers should use established shipping companies with unionised drivers.
- Washington Top News quoted Teamsters lobbyist Matt Broad, who said the union supports direct shipments but wants "meaningful guardrails that protect our members and protect the public." The report also noted that the wine industry’s representative said wineries are leery of extending delivery rights to distillers when larger liquor companies might demand the same.
Right
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Read it at the source
11 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
4- California craft liquor delivery is about to go away thanks to big money lobbying (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California craft liquor delivery is about to go away thanks to big money lobbying (opens Associated Press News in a new tab)
Associated Press News — is Associated Press News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California craft liquor delivery is about to go away thanks to big money lobbying (opens The Hamilton Spectator in a new tab)
The Hamilton Spectator — is The Hamilton Spectator biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California craft liquor delivery is about go away thanks to big money lobbying (opens Cal Matters in a new tab)
Cal Matters — is Cal Matters biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
Centre
4- California craft liquor delivery is about to go away thanks to big money lobbying (opens Washington Top News in a new tab)
Washington Top News — is Washington Top News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California craft liquor delivery is about to go away thanks to big money lobbying (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- California craft liquor delivery is about to go away thanks to big money lobbying (opens KPBS in a new tab)
- California craft liquor delivery is about go away thanks to big money lobbying (opens Danville San Ramon in a new tab)
Danville San Ramon
Right
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Not rated
3- California craft liquor delivery is about go away thanks to big money lobbying (opens pleasantonweekly.com in a new tab)
pleasantonweekly.com
- California craft liquor delivery is about go away thanks to big money lobbying (opens Redwood City Pulse in a new tab)
Redwood City Pulse
- California craft liquor delivery is about go away thanks to big money lobbying (opens Mountain View Voice in a new tab)
Mountain View VoiceOpinion
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

