Conservation groups sue over Wyoming oil and gas leases
Lawsuit claims federal government violated environmental laws by leasing land critical for big game migration.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Conservation groups sue over Wyoming oil and gas leases
Photograph: WyoFile (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Two conservation groups, The Wilderness Society and Wilderness Workshop, are suing the federal government over oil and gas leases in Wyoming and Colorado.
- The lawsuit claims the federal government broke environmental laws by leasing 179 square miles in Wyoming, threatening big game migration routes.
- The leases, sold for $34.7 million, are also being challenged in northwest Colorado, bringing the total contested area to 430 square miles.
- The Petroleum Association of Wyoming disputes the lawsuit's claims, stating that actual development requires further review.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 11 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 12 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
60/100
Craft
65/100
Hype
20/100
12 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
None of the 11 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Two conservation groups have filed a lawsuit alleging the federal government violated environmental laws by leasing 179 square miles in Wyoming for oil and gas drilling. The Wilderness Society and Wilderness Workshop claim these leases threaten already-diminished migrating big game herds. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Colorado, also challenges acreage leased in northwest Colorado, bringing the total contested area to 430 square miles. The groups assert that federal agencies prioritized oil and gas development over other land uses, violating their own regulations and environmental laws.
The leases were sold for $34.7 million, with revenue split between the federal government and the state. According to the lawsuit, the leases threaten migration corridors for Baggs mule deer and Sublette pronghorn, among other big game. The conservationists argue that energy development in these areas curtails wildlife habitat use. The lawsuit seeks to halt actions authorized by the challenged sales, set aside the sales, and return the issue for reconsideration by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
Disagreement over leasing process
The Petroleum Association of Wyoming disputes the lawsuit's central claims. Ryan McConnaughey, interim president of the association, stated that the lawsuit mischaracterizes the federal oil and natural gas leasing process, which he described as only the first step in development. He added that actual development requires additional review and approval by the BLM. The conservationists' attorney, Mike Freeman, countered that the BLM is supposed to balance oil and gas development with other uses, and that leasing constitutes an irreversible commitment of land and resources that cannot be properly mitigated once issued.
What the coverage left out
None of the left-rated or centre-rated reports printed below mention the specific royalty rate of 12.5% or the statement from the BLM that the reduction makes oil and gas development more economically attractive to industry. The full report from Washington Top News noted that the leases were conducted under last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act and that the royalty rate was discounted from 16.67%.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 5 times, most recently on 16 Sept 2026, 12:30, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
5 rated outlets
- The left-rated reports led with the assertion that the federal government broke environmental laws by leasing land for oil and gas drilling. These reports highlighted that the leases threaten already-diminished migrating big game herds. The digests mentioned the two conservation groups, The Wilderness Society and Wilderness Workshop, as the plaintiffs. They also noted the total acreage leased in Wyoming (179 square miles) and the broader challenge to leases in Colorado, bringing the total contested area to 430 square miles. The reports indicated the lawsuit was filed in federal court in Colorado.
Centre
6 rated outlets
- The centre-rated reports focused on the lawsuit filed by conservation groups claiming the federal government broke environmental laws by leasing 179 square miles in Wyoming for oil and gas drilling. These digests stated that the leases threaten migrating big game. Several of these reports noted the lawsuit was filed in federal court in Colorado and mentioned the total contested area across Wyoming and Colorado is 430 square miles. Some digests also included the detail that the leases were sold for $34.7 million.
Right
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Conservation groups sue over Wyoming oil and gas leases?
- Of the 11 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 46% are rated left, 54% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 12. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Conservation groups sue over Wyoming oil and gas leases left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 11 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of Conservation groups sue over Wyoming oil and gas leases biased?
- Conservation groups sue over Wyoming oil and gas leases is one event reported by 12 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Conservation groups sue over Wyoming oil and gas leases?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Conservation groups sue over Wyoming oil and gas leases?
- 12 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What is the lawsuit about?
- Two conservation groups are suing the federal government, alleging that leasing 179 square miles in Wyoming for oil and gas drilling violates environmental laws. They claim the leases threaten big game migration routes and that federal agencies prioritized fossil fuel development over other land uses.
- Which areas are affected by the leases?
- The lawsuit specifically challenges 179 square miles leased in Wyoming, which are said to threaten big game migration corridors. It also challenges acreage leased in northwest Colorado, bringing the total contested area to 430 square miles.
- What is the industry's response to the lawsuit?
- The Petroleum Association of Wyoming disputes the lawsuit's claims, stating that the leasing process is only the first step and that actual development requires further review and approval by the Bureau of Land Management. They argue the lawsuit mischaracterizes the federal leasing process.
Read it at the source
12 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
5- Oil and gas leases threaten big game migration routes, lawsuit claims (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Oil and gas leases threaten big game migration routes, lawsuit claims (opens Newsday in a new tab)
- Oil and gas leases threaten big game migration routes, lawsuit claims (opens Associated Press News in a new tab)
Associated Press News — is Associated Press News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Oil and gas leases threaten big game migration routes, lawsuit claims (opens The Record in a new tab)
The Record — is The Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Oil and gas leases threaten big game migration routes, lawsuit claims (opens WyoFile in a new tab)
Centre
6- Oil and gas leases threaten big game migration routes, lawsuit claims (opens Oil City News in a new tab)
Oil City News — is Oil City News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Oil and gas leases threaten big game migration routes, lawsuit claims – WTOP News (opens Washington Top News in a new tab)
Washington Top News — is Washington Top News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Oil and gas leases threaten big game migration routes, lawsuit claims (opens The Star Democrat in a new tab)
The Star Democrat — is The Star Democrat biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Oil and gas leases threaten big game migration routes, lawsuit claims (opens Daily News-Record in a new tab)
Daily News-Record — is Daily News-Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Oil and gas leases threaten big game migration routes, lawsuit claims (opens KULR-TV in a new tab)
- Oil and gas leases threaten big game migration routes, lawsuit claims (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Not rated
1How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

