Skip to the story
All stories

Democrat Lorena Austin calls deepfake images supporting Andy Biggs '100% not me'

AI-detection systems indicated the images were digitally altered, according to reports.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Democrat Lorena Austin calls deepfake images supporting Andy Biggs '100% not me'

What this story says

  • Democratic state Rep. Lorena Austin stated that images showing her supporting Republican gubernatorial candidate Andy Biggs were deepfakes.
  • AI-detection systems indicated that the images were digitally altered.
  • The images were shared on X by Matt Whitmire and Mary Ann Mendoza, identified as Turning Point Action managers.
  • Mendoza stated her post was a joke with humorous intent.

Who covered it

Left 100%(6)Centre 0%(0)Right 0%(0)

Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 7 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

60/100

Craft

60/100

Hype

20/100

7 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

None of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Images circulating on social media over a weekend appeared to show Democratic state Rep. Lorena Austin supporting Republican gubernatorial candidate Andy Biggs. Austin stated the images were deepfakes and that she did not consent to their creation. The photos depicted a person resembling Austin holding a campaign sign for Biggs, who is challenging Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs. Reports noted that some of Austin's tattoos were not accurately represented in the images, and no official campaign titled "Demócratas por Biggs" or "Democrats for Biggs" exists.

The images were shared on the social media platform X by Matt Whitmire and Mary Ann Mendoza, who are identified as Chase the Vote Managers for Turning Point Action. AI-detection systems used by The Arizona Republic indicated that at least one of the images was digitally altered. Mendoza later stated that her post was a joke with humorous intent. Whitmire and Mendoza have since deleted the images from their X accounts. Biggs' spokesperson Drew Sexton stated the campaign is not responsible for policing what supporters say.

Disagreement on intent

Mary Ann Mendoza stated that her post was a joke with humorous intent, saying, "An open borders radical like Lorena Austin would never stand with a patriot like Andy Biggs, the humorous intent is obvious to competent journalists." AZCentral reported that Austin denounced Turning Point Action, believing the group played a role in the posts. Austin told AZCentral, “I think Turning Point is deceitful and dishonest, and this is on par for them.” Turning Point Action did not respond to requests for comment.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated reports mentioned any potential legal action Austin might take regarding the deepfake images, beyond her interest in strengthening AI laws. The Arizona Capitol Times report, while focused on the gubernatorial race between Hobbs and Biggs, did not mention the deepfake images at all.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 9 Sept 2026, 18:45, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Democrat Lorena Austin calls deepfake images supporting Andy Biggs '100% not me'
Arizona Capitol TimesLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

6 rated outlets

  • Left-rated reports led on Democratic state Rep. Lorena Austin's assertion that images showing her supporting Republican gubernatorial candidate Andy Biggs were deepfakes. These reports stated that AI-detection systems indicated the images were digitally altered. The coverage noted the images were shared on X by Matt Whitmire and Mary Ann Mendoza, identified as Turning Point Action managers. Some reports included Austin's statement that the images were generated without her consent and her criticism of Turning Point Action. Mendoza's statement that her post was a joke was also reported.

Centre

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated centre has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Right

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Democrat Lorena Austin calls deepfake images supporting Andy Biggs…?
Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 100% are rated left, 0% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 7. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Democrat Lorena Austin calls deepfake images supporting Andy Biggs… left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of Democrat Lorena Austin calls deepfake images supporting Andy Biggs… biased?
Democrat Lorena Austin calls deepfake images supporting Andy Biggs '100% not me' is one event reported by 7 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Democrat Lorena Austin calls deepfake images supporting Andy Biggs…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Democrat Lorena Austin calls deepfake images supporting Andy Biggs…?
7 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did Democratic state Rep. Lorena Austin say about the images?
Lorena Austin stated that images appearing to show her supporting Republican gubernatorial candidate Andy Biggs were deepfakes. She said the images were generated without her consent and were "100% not me."
Who shared the images that Austin called deepfakes?
The images were shared on X by Matt Whitmire and Mary Ann Mendoza. They are identified as Chase the Vote Managers for Turning Point Action. Both individuals have since deleted the images from their social media accounts.
Did AI-detection systems confirm the images were altered?
Yes, AI-detection systems used by The Arizona Republic indicated that the images were digitally altered. Reports stated that at least one of the images showed signs of digital manipulation.
What was Mary Ann Mendoza's explanation for sharing the images?
Mary Ann Mendoza stated that her post containing the images was intended as a joke with humorous intent. She said that an "open borders radical like Lorena Austin would never stand with a patriot like Andy Biggs."

Read it at the source

7 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Lorena Austin Deepfake Images | MediaBias News