Skip to the story
All stories

DOJ Civil Rights Division probes Pennsauken gun‑permit delays

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon says the inquiry will test whether local officials are violating the Second Amendment

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
DOJ Civil Rights Division probes Pennsauken gun‑permit delays

What this story says

  • The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division launched an inquiry into Pennsauken Township’s firearm‑permit process.
  • Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said the review will assess possible Second Amendment violations.
  • Applicants for a concealed‑carry permit must submit four references, a ten‑year address history and fingerprints.
  • Pennsauken’s mayor and the township have not issued a public comment.

Who covered it

Left 0%(0)Centre 0%(0)Right 100%(6)

Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .

Trust

78/100

Craft

95/100

Hype

15/100

6 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

None of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

The U.S. Department of Justice announced that its Civil Rights Division is investigating whether Pennsauken Township, New Jersey, unlawfully delayed the issuance of concealed‑carry permits. The investigation focuses on the township police department’s permitting system and asks whether the delays amount to a deprivation of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said the probe is intended to protect law‑abiding citizens from local actions that infringe on that right.

Pennsauken’s official website lists the requirements for a concealed‑carry permit as four personal references, a ten‑year residential history and fingerprint submission. The township has not released a public statement about the DOJ’s announcement. Democratic Mayor Nicole Roberts did not answer a request for comment at the time of reporting.

Discrepancies between reports

The Daily BS article added that the state’s gun laws are among the nation’s strictest, citing the NRA‑ILA, a detail absent from the U‑S‑News report. The Daily BS piece also referenced unrelated DOJ actions in Philadelphia, San Jose and Los Angeles, which the U‑S‑News story did not mention.

“I have directed the Civil Rights Division, through our Second Amendment Section, to defend law‑abiding citizens from local authorities who infringe on the right to safely carry legal firearms. Our investigation aims to discover if allegations of unconstitutional delays in firearm permitting are true, and if so, to fix it.”

— Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights

Omissions

No left‑rated or centre‑rated outlets ran this story, leaving the perspective of those parts of the media absent from the coverage.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 15 Oct 2026, 04:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

DOJ Civil Rights Division probes Pennsauken gun‑permit delays
thedailybs.comRight

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated left has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Centre

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated centre has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Right

6 rated outlets

  • All six right‑rated outlets highlighted the DOJ’s claim that Pennsauken may be denying citizens their Second Amendment rights through permit delays. The reports repeatedly noted Dhillon’s statement that the Civil Rights Division will defend law‑abiding citizens from local authorities that infringe on the right to carry firearms. Several headlines, such as those from Breitbart and the Daily Caller, framed the investigation as a Trump‑administration effort, underscoring the political context.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover DOJ Civil Rights Division probes Pennsauken gun‑permit delays?
Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 0% are rated left, 0% are rated centre, 100% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is DOJ Civil Rights Division probes Pennsauken gun‑permit delays left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of DOJ Civil Rights Division probes Pennsauken gun‑permit delays biased?
DOJ Civil Rights Division probes Pennsauken gun‑permit delays is one event reported by 6 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting DOJ Civil Rights Division probes Pennsauken gun‑permit delays?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered DOJ Civil Rights Division probes Pennsauken gun‑permit delays?
6 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is the Justice Department investigating?
The Civil Rights Division is examining whether Pennsauken Township’s police department is unlawfully delaying the issuance of concealed‑carry permits, which could constitute a violation of the Second Amendment rights of residents.
What are the requirements for a concealed‑carry permit in Pennsauken?
Applicants must provide four personal references, a ten‑year address history and submit fingerprints, according to the township’s official website.
What did Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon say about the probe?
Dhillon said the investigation is meant to protect law‑abiding citizens from local officials who infringe on the right to safely carry firearms and that the division will act to correct any unconstitutional delays.
Has Pennsauken responded to the investigation?
As of the reporting date, Pennsauken Township has not issued a public response, and Mayor Nicole Roberts did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

Read it at the source

6 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

DOJ Probes Pennsauken Gun Permits | MediaBias News