Skip to the story
All stories

DOJ Finds UCSF Medical School Discriminated Against White and Asian Applicants

The Department of Justice concluded its investigation into admissions at the University of California, San Francisco, Medical School.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
DOJ Finds UCSF Medical School Discriminated Against White and Asian Applicants

What this story says

  • The Department of Justice has concluded an investigation into the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Medical School's admissions practices.
  • The DOJ found that UCSF discriminated against white and Asian applicants in favor of Black and Hispanic applicants.
  • Statistical evidence cited by the DOJ showed admitted Black and Hispanic students had lower average MCAT scores than admitted white and Asian students.
  • UCSF disputes the DOJ's findings and intends to work with the department to resolve the matter.

Who covered it

Left 13%(3)Centre 35%(8)Right 52%(12)

Percentages are shares of the 23 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 2 of the 25 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

60/100

Craft

65/100

Hype

45/100

25 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 3 of the 23 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has concluded its investigation into admissions at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Medical School. The DOJ found that the school discriminated against white and Asian applicants. This is the fifth institution within the University of California system that the DOJ has targeted with similar allegations.

The DOJ cited statistical evidence indicating that admitted Black and Hispanic students had lower average MCAT scores than admitted white and Asian students. The department also took issue with UCSF's Program in Medical Education (PRIME), which it described as a pipeline program for underrepresented minority students. According to the DOJ, the school's admissions policy, which stated a commitment to reflecting California's population, was evidence of intentional discrimination.

UCSF disputes the government's assessment and plans to work constructively with the DOJ to resolve the matter. A spokesperson for UCSF stated that admission to the school is highly selective and that every applicant is evaluated through a rigorous, individualized review process that prioritizes academic excellence. The spokesperson added that grades, coursework, and MCAT scores are considered alongside other factors to identify future physicians.

Disagreement on PRIME program description

The DOJ described UCSF's Program in Medical Education (PRIME) as a pipeline program for underrepresented minority students from high school through medical school. However, public-facing information about the PRIME program describes it as a specific track within the medical program focused on serving underserved populations, which typically includes a fifth year for research and a master's degree. Students do not need to be Black or Hispanic to participate in PRIME.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated, centre-rated, or right-rated digests mention the specific date the DOJ investigation was opened, which Inside Higher Ed stated was in March. None of the digests mention the specific academic years the DOJ's statistical evidence covered, beyond the general timeframe of 2023-2025 mentioned in one digest.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 6 times, most recently on 24 Sept 2026, 23:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

3 rated outlets

  • The left-rated reports led on the Department of Justice's accusation that UCSF's medical school discriminated against white and Asian applicants. These reports included the DOJ's finding that Black and Hispanic students had lower average MCAT scores than white and Asian students. They also noted that UCSF disputes the government's assessment and plans to work constructively with the DOJ. Inside Higher Ed, which provided a full report, included details about the PRIME program and noted that experts in civil rights law have criticized how the Trump administration handled similar investigations, arguing that disparities in MCAT scores are not sufficient to prove discrimination.

Centre

8 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports focused on the Department of Justice's allegation that the University of California, San Francisco's medical school illegally favored Black and Latino applicants over white and Asian ones. These reports highlighted that UCSF disputes the DOJ's findings and that the institution plans to work with the department. Several centre-rated reports mentioned that this is the fifth UC campus targeted by the DOJ for similar admissions discrimination claims. The reports also stated that the DOJ alleged the school used race in admissions, discriminating against white and Asian applicants.

Right

12 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports led on the Department of Justice's finding that UCSF's medical school discriminated against white and Asian applicants. These reports frequently cited the DOJ's claim that MCAT scores and GPAs had taken a backseat to race in the school's admissions. Several right-rated reports highlighted specific disparities, such as the DOJ finding that UCSF was 12.6 times more likely to admit Black students than white students with comparable qualifications. Some reports also framed the situation as a case of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) practices.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover DOJ Finds UCSF Medical School Discriminated Against White and Asian…?
Of the 23 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 13% are rated left, 35% are rated centre, 52% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 25. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is DOJ Finds UCSF Medical School Discriminated Against White and Asian… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 23 rated outlets on this story, 13% are rated left, 35% are rated centre, 52% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of DOJ Finds UCSF Medical School Discriminated Against White and Asian… biased?
DOJ Finds UCSF Medical School Discriminated Against White and Asian Applicants is one event reported by 25 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting DOJ Finds UCSF Medical School Discriminated Against White and Asian…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered DOJ Finds UCSF Medical School Discriminated Against White and Asian…?
25 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did the Department of Justice find regarding UCSF's medical school admissions?
The Department of Justice concluded its investigation into UCSF's medical school admissions and found that the institution discriminated against white and Asian applicants. The DOJ cited statistical evidence showing lower average MCAT scores for admitted Black and Hispanic students compared to white and Asian students.
How has UCSF responded to the DOJ's findings?
UCSF disputes the government's assessment and has stated its intention to work constructively with the Department of Justice to resolve the matter. A UCSF spokesperson emphasized the school's rigorous, individualized admissions process that prioritizes academic excellence.
What is the PRIME program at UCSF?
The Program in Medical Education (PRIME) at UCSF is described by the DOJ as a pipeline program for underrepresented minority students. However, UCSF's public-facing information characterizes it as a specific track within the medical program focused on serving underserved populations, which can include research and a master's degree.

Read it at the source

25 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

3

Centre

8

Right

12
Show 4 more

Not rated

2

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

UCSF Medical School Discrimination Findings | MediaBias News