Skip to the story
All stories

DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds unconstitutional

Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel says federal law violates Second Amendment rights.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds unconstitutional

What this story says

  • A Justice Department legal opinion states a federal law banning handgun sales to 18-20 year olds is unconstitutional.
  • The opinion, from the Office of Legal Counsel, suggests federal prosecutors may stop pursuing felony charges against dealers selling handguns to this age group.
  • The opinion is not legally binding and does not create precedent.
  • The pro-gun control group GIFFORDS criticised the decision, calling it a move to appease the gun lobby.

Who covered it

Left 22%(15)Centre 35%(24)Right 43%(29)

Percentages are shares of the 68 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 10 of the 78 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

61/100

Hype

41/100

78 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 15 of the 68 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel has issued a legal opinion concluding that a federal law prohibiting licensed dealers from selling handguns and handgun ammunition to individuals aged 18 to 20 is unconstitutional. The opinion states this prohibition violates Second Amendment rights.

The opinion suggests that federal prosecutors may refrain from pursuing felony charges against licensed firearms dealers who sell handguns to this age group. However, the document is not legally binding and does not establish precedent. The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, T. Elliot Gaiser, wrote that laws deem an 18-year-old mature enough to vote and serve on a jury, yet statutes predicated on concerns over their ability to handle a pistol prevent sales.

The pro-gun control organization GIFFORDS criticised the decision. Executive Director Emma Brown stated that the move was an attempt by the administration to please the gun lobby and that individuals aged 18 to 20 are responsible for a disproportionate share of shootings. GIFFORDS indicated they would fight the decision.

Coverage comparison

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mention the criticism from the pro-gun control organization GIFFORDS. The left-rated side did not run this story at all.

Coverage settled. We checked this 13 times and stopped on 24 Sept 2026, 02:30. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

15 rated outlets

  • All twelve left‑rated outlets led on the Justice Department’s legal opinion that the federal ban on handgun sales to 18‑ to 20‑year‑olds is unconstitutional and therefore cannot be enforced. The Hindu, The Independent, AP News, USA Today, abc News and the remaining outlets each reported the department’s conclusion that the restriction violates the Second Amendment.
  • USA Today added that the prohibition had been in place for more than fifty years and dated the opinion to 18 September. Axios specified that the Department will not criminally enforce the 1968 statute, citing the Office of Legal Counsel’s finding that it breaches the Second Amendment. The other digests did not repeat these extra points.
  • None of the left‑rated digests mentioned responses from gun‑rights organisations, any cost estimates, or broader policy debates about the ban’s impact. They also omitted any discussion of congressional action or state‑level legislation. The coverage therefore focused solely on the DOJ’s legal conclusion without reporting external commentary.

Centre

24 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports led on the Justice Department's conclusion that the federal ban on handgun sales to young adults is unconstitutional. CBS News, in its full report, quoted T. Elliot Gaiser, assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel, who argued that 18-year-olds are deemed mature enough for significant responsibilities, yet are barred from purchasing handguns. This report also included criticism from GIFFORDS, quoting Executive Director Emma Brown and detailing the organisation's concerns about the age group's involvement in shootings.

Right

29 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports focused on the Justice Department's declaration that the federal ban on handgun sales to 18-20 year olds is unconstitutional and cannot be enforced. Headlines from outlets such as Breitbart, RedState, and The Free Press (Tampa) highlighted the unconstitutionality of the ban. Several reports, including those from Washington Examiner and WLTReport, noted that the Justice Department concluded federal prosecutors may not criminally enforce the ban against licensed dealers selling to law-abiding adults in this age group. Just the News quoted the OLC opinion stating the provision prevents young adults, who are members of 'the people' to whom the Second Amendment applies, from owning 'arms' in common use for self-defense.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds…?
Of the 68 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 22% are rated left, 35% are rated centre, 43% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 78. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 68 rated outlets on this story, 22% are rated left, 35% are rated centre, 43% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds… biased?
DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds unconstitutional is one event reported by 78 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds…?
78 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did the Justice Department's legal opinion conclude?
The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion stating that a federal law prohibiting licensed dealers from selling handguns to individuals aged 18-20 is unconstitutional because it violates Second Amendment rights. This suggests federal prosecutors may stop pursuing felony charges against dealers selling to this age group.
Is the Justice Department's opinion legally binding?
No, the opinion issued by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel is not legally binding and does not create precedent. It is a legal interpretation that suggests a change in prosecutorial approach rather than a court ruling.
What was the reaction to the Justice Department's opinion?
The pro-gun control organization GIFFORDS criticised the decision, calling it a move to please the gun lobby. They stated that 18-20 year olds are responsible for a disproportionate share of shootings and vowed to fight the decision.

Read it at the source

78 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

15
Show 7 more

Centre

24
Show 16 more

Right

29
Show 21 more

Not rated

10
Show 2 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

DOJ Opinion on Handgun Sales | MediaBias News