Skip to the story
All stories

DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds unconstitutional

Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel says federal law violates Second Amendment rights.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds unconstitutional

What this story says

  • A Justice Department legal opinion states a federal law banning handgun sales to 18-20 year olds is unconstitutional.
  • The opinion, from the Office of Legal Counsel, suggests federal prosecutors may stop pursuing felony charges against dealers selling handguns to this age group.
  • The opinion is not legally binding and does not create precedent.
  • The pro-gun control group GIFFORDS criticised the decision, calling it a move to appease the gun lobby.

Who covered it

Left 0%(0)Centre 20%(2)Right 80%(8)

Percentages are shares of the 10 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 2 of the 12 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

61/100

Hype

41/100

12 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

None of the 10 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel has issued a legal opinion concluding that a federal law prohibiting licensed dealers from selling handguns and handgun ammunition to individuals aged 18 to 20 is unconstitutional. The opinion states this prohibition violates Second Amendment rights.

The opinion suggests that federal prosecutors may refrain from pursuing felony charges against licensed firearms dealers who sell handguns to this age group. However, the document is not legally binding and does not establish precedent. The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, T. Elliot Gaiser, wrote that laws deem an 18-year-old mature enough to vote and serve on a jury, yet statutes predicated on concerns over their ability to handle a pistol prevent sales.

The pro-gun control organization GIFFORDS criticised the decision. Executive Director Emma Brown stated that the move was an attempt by the administration to please the gun lobby and that individuals aged 18 to 20 are responsible for a disproportionate share of shootings. GIFFORDS indicated they would fight the decision.

Coverage comparison

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mention the criticism from the pro-gun control organization GIFFORDS. The left-rated side did not run this story at all.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 18 Sept 2026, 20:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated left has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Centre

2 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports led on the Justice Department's conclusion that the federal ban on handgun sales to young adults is unconstitutional. CBS News, in its full report, quoted T. Elliot Gaiser, assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel, who argued that 18-year-olds are deemed mature enough for significant responsibilities, yet are barred from purchasing handguns. This report also included criticism from GIFFORDS, quoting Executive Director Emma Brown and detailing the organisation's concerns about the age group's involvement in shootings.

Right

8 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports focused on the Justice Department's declaration that the federal ban on handgun sales to 18-20 year olds is unconstitutional and cannot be enforced. Headlines from outlets such as Breitbart, RedState, and The Free Press (Tampa) highlighted the unconstitutionality of the ban. Several reports, including those from Washington Examiner and WLTReport, noted that the Justice Department concluded federal prosecutors may not criminally enforce the ban against licensed dealers selling to law-abiding adults in this age group. Just the News quoted the OLC opinion stating the provision prevents young adults, who are members of 'the people' to whom the Second Amendment applies, from owning 'arms' in common use for self-defense.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds…?
Of the 10 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 0% are rated left, 20% are rated centre, 80% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 12. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds… left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 10 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds… biased?
DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds unconstitutional is one event reported by 12 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered DOJ legal opinion finds handgun sales ban for 18-20 year olds…?
12 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did the Justice Department's legal opinion conclude?
The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion stating that a federal law prohibiting licensed dealers from selling handguns to individuals aged 18-20 is unconstitutional because it violates Second Amendment rights. This suggests federal prosecutors may stop pursuing felony charges against dealers selling to this age group.
Is the Justice Department's opinion legally binding?
No, the opinion issued by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel is not legally binding and does not create precedent. It is a legal interpretation that suggests a change in prosecutorial approach rather than a court ruling.
What was the reaction to the Justice Department's opinion?
The pro-gun control organization GIFFORDS criticised the decision, calling it a move to please the gun lobby. They stated that 18-20 year olds are responsible for a disproportionate share of shootings and vowed to fight the decision.

Read it at the source

12 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Centre

2

Right

8

Not rated

2

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

DOJ Opinion on Handgun Sales | MediaBias News