Skip to the story
All StoriesPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusiness & EconomyScience & TechHealthClimateMedia
All stories
Politics29 outlets ran this3 min read

FBI agent recommended criminal probe into Elon Musk, email shows

Declassified communication cited potential violations of federal blackmail and conflict-of-interest statutes.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
FBI agent recommended criminal probe into Elon Musk, email shows

What this story says

  • An FBI agent, Kevin Gounaud, recommended opening a criminal matter concerning officials at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management and Elon Musk.
  • Gounaud cited Musk's statement that non-compliance with the 'Five Things' directive constituted resignation as potentially violating the federal blackmail statute.
  • The agent also cited federal conflict-of-interest provisions regarding Musk's ownership of X and its use in connection with government activity.
  • The declassified email does not establish that federal prosecutors formally adopted the agent's recommendations or opened a criminal case against Musk.

Who covered it

Left 4%(1)Centre 5%(1)Right 91%(21)

Percentages are shares of the 23 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 6 of the 29 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

57/100

Hype

68/100

29 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 1 of the 23 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

A declassified FBI email shows that agent Kevin Gounaud recommended opening a criminal investigation into officials at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management and Elon Musk. The communication, dated 22 February 2025, was released by Senator Chuck Grassley as part of his oversight of the FBI and Justice Department. Gounaud's recommendation was based on the 'Five Things' directive, which required federal employees to document weekly accomplishments, and Musk's public statements on X that non-compliance would be considered a resignation.

The agent cited potential violations of federal law, including the blackmail statute (18 USC 873) and conflict-of-interest provisions (18 USC 208). Gounaud argued that Musk's statement about resignation could violate the blackmail statute. He also raised concerns about Musk's ownership of X and its use in connection with government activity, suggesting it could violate conflict-of-interest rules. The email does not indicate that federal prosecutors adopted Gounaud's recommendations or initiated a criminal case.

Disagreement on context

Senator Chuck Grassley released the email as part of his ongoing examination of the FBI and Justice Department. The IBTimes UK report stated Grassley framed the disclosure as part of his broader argument about law enforcement and intelligence officials targeting Donald Trump and other Republicans. The cedarnews.net report did not include this framing, stating only that Grassley released the material as part of his continuing oversight.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mention the specific federal statutes cited by the FBI agent, 18 USC 873 (blackmail) and 18 USC 208 (conflict-of-interest).

Tags:#ElonMusk#FBI#DOJ#Grassley#OPM#Politics

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 7 times, most recently on 16 Sept 2026, 18:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

FBI agent recommended criminal probe into Elon Musk, email shows
cedarnews.netCentre

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

1 rated outlet

  • The single left-rated report, from IBTimes UK, led with the FBI agent's statement, "I'm Not Kidding," about opening a criminal matter. It detailed the 'Five Things' directive and Musk's statement on X. The report included Gounaud's specific legal theories, citing federal conflict-of-interest and blackmail statutes. It also noted that the declassified document does not establish that federal prosecutors formally adopted the agent's recommendations or opened a criminal case. The report framed the disclosure within Senator Grassley's broader inquiries into political conduct and interagency friction, and his stated efforts to expose alleged targeting of Donald Trump and other Republicans.

Centre

1 rated outlet

  • The centre-rated report from cedarnews.net highlighted that an FBI agent sought a criminal investigation of Elon Musk over the 'Five Things' email, as shown by a record released by Senator Grassley. It stated the agent recommended opening a criminal "58 matter" into individuals at OPM, alleging possible misconduct connected to Musk. The report clarified that the record showed an internal recommendation, not proof of a crime or that a case was opened. It also mentioned the agent compared the situation conceptually to Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.

Right

21 rated outlets

  • The right-rated reports, predominantly digests, focused on the FBI agent's push to criminally investigate Elon Musk. Many headlines and digests used phrases like 'Worse than Watergate' or described the agent's actions as an attempt to 'prosecute' Musk. Several reports mentioned Musk's involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and the 'Five Things' directive. Some digests drew parallels between Musk's situation and Hillary Clinton's email scandal. Senator Grassley's release of the email was consistently noted, with some outlets framing it within his broader claims of FBI and Justice Department bias against Donald Trump and Republicans.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover FBI agent recommended criminal probe into Elon Musk, email shows?
Of the 23 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 4% are rated left, 5% are rated centre, 91% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 29. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is FBI agent recommended criminal probe into Elon Musk, email shows left or right?
The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 91% of the 23 rated outlets on it are rated right — so far this is a story carried mostly by the right. Coverage is still arriving and that can change, which is why the figure is dated rather than fixed.
Is the coverage of FBI agent recommended criminal probe into Elon Musk, email shows biased?
FBI agent recommended criminal probe into Elon Musk, email shows is one event reported by 29 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting FBI agent recommended criminal probe into Elon Musk, email shows?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered FBI agent recommended criminal probe into Elon Musk, email shows?
29 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did the FBI agent recommend regarding Elon Musk?
FBI agent Kevin Gounaud recommended opening a criminal matter concerning officials at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management and Elon Musk. He cited Musk's statements about the 'Five Things' directive and potential violations of federal blackmail and conflict-of-interest statutes.
Did federal prosecutors open a criminal case against Elon Musk?
The declassified email does not establish that federal prosecutors formally adopted the FBI agent's recommendations or opened a criminal case against Elon Musk. It reflects the agent's legal assessment at the time.
Who released the FBI email?
Senator Chuck Grassley released the declassified FBI email. He stated it was part of his ongoing oversight of the FBI and Justice Department.

Read it at the source

29 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

1

Centre

1

Right

21
Show 13 more

Not rated

6

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

More in Politics

All Politics →
FBI has new information on Trump assassination attempt attacker3 min readFBI has new information on Trump assassination attempt attackerRead storyFBI Director Kash Patel Won't Rule Out Agents at Polling Places3 min readFBI Director Kash Patel Won't Rule Out Agents at Polling PlacesRead storyNew FBI documents detail Trump assassin Thomas Crooks' background4 min readNew FBI documents detail Trump assassin Thomas Crooks' backgroundRead story
Elon Musk FBI Probe | MediaBias News