Skip to the story
All stories

FBI opened probes into protesters after Trump demands, whistleblower says

A former analyst alleges the FBI targeted individuals based on political pressure, violating policy.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
FBI opened probes into protesters after Trump demands, whistleblower says

What this story says

  • The FBI opened preliminary investigations into anti-ICE protesters in Southern California, according to former FBI intelligence analyst Jill Fields.
  • Fields alleges these investigations were initiated in early 2025 after demands from President Donald Trump and other administration officials.
  • In at least one instance, the FBI began investigations after Trump demanded a probe into protesters seen in a TikTok video, Fields claims.
  • Fields claims the FBI opened investigations even though agency policy prohibits opening probes based solely on First Amendment-protected activity without evidence of a crime.

Who covered it

Left 47%(18)Centre 53%(20)Right 0%(0)

Percentages are shares of the 38 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 8 of the 46 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

50/100

Craft

65/100

Hype

20/100

46 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

None of the 38 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

A former FBI intelligence analyst has alleged that the FBI opened preliminary investigations into anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement protesters in Southern California. Jill Fields, who was a supervisory intelligence analyst in the FBI’s Los Angeles field office, filed a whistleblower complaint stating she believed these actions violated federal law and agency policy. The investigations, according to Fields, were initiated in early 2025 following demands from President Donald Trump and other administration officials.

In at least one specific instance, Fields claims the FBI began investigations after President Trump demanded a probe into protesters featured in a TikTok video. These individuals were seen using bullhorns to warn neighbours about the presence of immigration enforcement officers in Alhambra, California. Fields’ complaint, reviewed by CNN, states that an analyst working under her reported being ordered to conduct pre-assessment checks on these protesters, even though the FBI policy prohibits opening investigations based solely on First Amendment-protected activity and without evidence of a crime.

Fields also alleges that White House officials demanded the FBI investigate and arrest anti-ICE protesters in at least two separate incidents. According to the complaint, supervisors were instructed not to put such directives in writing, leading to many being communicated in face-to-face meetings. Fields stated she was excluded from investigations once she refused to participate and later resigned from the bureau, believing it was retaliation for making protected internal disclosures.

Disagreement on FBI response

A Justice Department spokesperson told CNN that the department "will continue to vigorously uphold the First Amendment rights of all Americans and restore the rule of law." The spokesperson added that "the DOJ and FBI have a responsibility to investigate any potential violations of federal law, and conspiracies to impede federal law enforcement and assaults on federal officers are against the law." The spokesperson also stated that "violence is not protected by the First Amendment" and "politically motivated attacks will not deter us from doing our job."

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated or centre-rated reports mention the FBI Director Kash Patel telling top FBI leaders that the president "was angry about the incident, and he wanted those protesters investigated and arrested," as detailed in the full report from KRDO. The full report from KRDO also states that Fields was stripped of her team and lost support from FBI leadership in her Los Angeles office, pushing her to resign. No right-rated outlet ran this story.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 70 times, most recently on 7 Oct 2026, 11:45, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

18 rated outlets

  • Reports from outlets rated left focused on the whistleblower's claim that the White House pushed the FBI to conduct an unconstitutional probe of protesters. These reports highlighted that former analyst Jill Fields alleged supervisors were told not to put directives in writing, with many coming in face-to-face meetings. NBC News reported that Fields' disclosure was seen by Senator Alex Padilla as another instance of Trump weaponising the Justice Department against perceived political enemies. Government Accountability Project, representing Fields, stated the conduct had significant consequences for constitutional rights and the integrity of the FBI.

Centre

20 rated outlets

  • Outlets rated centre led with the allegation that the FBI investigated anti-ICE protesters after President Trump demanded a probe over a TikTok video, as detailed in a whistleblower complaint. These reports stated the FBI opened preliminary investigations targeting protesters in Southern California, with the former analyst believing the move violated law and agency policy. The investigations were reportedly opened in early 2025 following demands from Trump and other administration officials. Several centre-rated outlets noted that the FBI began investigations after Trump demanded a probe into protesters seen in a TikTok video depicting demonstrators against ICE and Customs and Border Protection.

Right

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover FBI opened probes into protesters after Trump demands, whistleblower…?
Of the 38 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 47% are rated left, 53% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 46. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is FBI opened probes into protesters after Trump demands, whistleblower… left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 38 rated outlets on this story, 47% are rated left, 53% are rated centre, 0% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of FBI opened probes into protesters after Trump demands, whistleblower… biased?
FBI opened probes into protesters after Trump demands, whistleblower says is one event reported by 46 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting FBI opened probes into protesters after Trump demands, whistleblower…?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered FBI opened probes into protesters after Trump demands, whistleblower…?
46 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is the main allegation made by whistleblower Jill Fields?
Jill Fields, a former FBI intelligence analyst, alleges that the FBI opened preliminary investigations into anti-ICE protesters in Southern California. She claims these investigations were initiated in early 2025 due to demands from President Donald Trump and other administration officials, potentially violating FBI policy and First Amendment rights.
What specific incident prompted an FBI investigation, according to the whistleblower?
According to Jill Fields, in at least one instance, the FBI began investigations after President Trump demanded a probe into protesters seen in a TikTok video. These protesters were warning neighbours about immigration enforcement officers in Alhambra, California, and Fields claims the investigation proceeded without evidence of a crime.
How did the FBI and Justice Department respond to the allegations?
A Justice Department spokesperson told CNN that the department "will continue to vigorously uphold the First Amendment rights of all Americans and restore the rule of law." The spokesperson added that the DOJ and FBI have a responsibility to investigate potential violations of federal law and that violence is not protected by the First Amendment.

Read it at the source

46 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

18
Show 10 more

Centre

20
Show 12 more

Right

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Not rated

8

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

FBI Probes into Protesters | MediaBias News