FBI relaxes hiring rules on prostitution encounters
The bureau will now consider some applicants holistically rather than automatically disqualifying them.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made
An FBI seal is displayed on a podium before a news conference at the field office in Portland, Ore., Jan. 16, 2025. (AP Photo/Jenny Kane, File)
Photograph: Associated Press News (embedded from source)
What this story says
- The FBI is no longer automatically disqualifying all applicants who have had sexual encounters with prostitutes.
- The bureau will now consider some candidates holistically, rather than as automatic rejections.
- Applicants who engaged in prostitution within the last 10 years, three or more times overall, or while in a position of trust, will still be dismissed.
- The FBI stated that criminal behaviour like this is still disqualifying and that suitability standards remain high.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 92 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 8 of the 100 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
42/100
Craft
57/100
Hype
20/100
100 sources · methodology
Missing from the right
Only 7 of the 92 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.
The FBI has ended its policy of automatically disqualifying applicants who have had sexual encounters with prostitutes. The bureau will now consider some candidates holistically, rather than as automatic rejections. This shift is part of evolving recruitment standards within federal law enforcement, occurring as the FBI seeks to replenish its ranks amid personnel losses.
However, the FBI stated that criminal behaviour like this is still disqualifying and that suitability standards remain high. Applicants who engaged in prostitution within the last 10 years, three or more times overall, or while in a position of trust, will still be dismissed. The FBI indicated the change was made to account for circumstances where candidates may have engaged in the practice where it is legal, or to accommodate applicants who may have been victims of sexual abuse.
Disagreement on specific disqualifiers
While the FBI stated that criminal behaviour remains disqualifying, CBS News reported that under specific circumstances, the FBI is willing to give candidates a pass on prostitution as long as they have not hired sex workers three or more times and the hiring did not take place within the last 10 years. CBS News also reported that a person in a position of "trust" who solicited sex would still be automatically disqualified, with examples of such positions including public safety, education, health, social work, finance, or law.
What the coverage left out
None of the left- or centre-rated reports mentioned the FBI's claim that the change was made to accommodate applicants who themselves may have been victims of sexual abuse, a detail present in the Associated Press full report.
Coverage settled. We checked this 101 times and stopped on 3 Sept 2026, 00:15. The figures above are what it finished at.
How other outlets pictured it
Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
37 rated outlets
- The Associated Press, the only outlet to publish a full report, stated the FBI will no longer automatically disqualify applicants with past prostitution encounters. Instead, the bureau will consider some candidates holistically, accounting for context. The FBI said this change allows consideration of applicants, including service members, who engaged in the practice where legal or who were victims of abuse.
- The Associated Press report included statements from the FBI denying that criminal behaviour is no longer disqualifying. It also quoted a retired FBI agent who expressed concern about a perceived loosening of recruitment standards amid personnel shortages. A lawyer specialising in security clearances noted such admissions were typically a career-ending issue.
- Twelve left-rated outlets reported the FBI's policy change. Ten of these reports were digests, stating the FBI is dropping a categorical hiring ban on applicants with past prostitution encounters and will consider some candidates more holistically. The Associated Press report added that the FBI still intends to dismiss applicants with three or more encounters in the last 10 years or those in positions of trust.
Centre
48 rated outlets
- Centre-rated reports focused on the FBI no longer treating past experiences with prostitution as an automatic barrier to hiring. CBS News, which provided a full report, detailed that the FBI lowered some standards to facilitate hiring, even if candidates acknowledged engaging in sexually deviant activities or stealing from an employer. CBS News reported that under specific circumstances, the FBI is willing to give candidates a pass on prostitution if they have not hired sex workers three or more times and the incidents occurred more than 10 years ago. It also noted that individuals in positions of trust would still be automatically disqualified. Other centre-rated reports highlighted that prior encounters with prostitutes are no longer an automatic bar to employment.
Right
7 rated outlets
We have not written our reading of the right coverage of this story. The right-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover FBI relaxes hiring rules on prostitution encounters?
- Of the 92 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 40% are rated left, 52% are rated centre, 8% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 100. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is FBI relaxes hiring rules on prostitution encounters left or right?
- Neither side dominates it. Of the 92 rated outlets on this story, 40% are rated left, 52% are rated centre, 8% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
- Is the coverage of FBI relaxes hiring rules on prostitution encounters biased?
- FBI relaxes hiring rules on prostitution encounters is one event reported by 100 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting FBI relaxes hiring rules on prostitution encounters?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered FBI relaxes hiring rules on prostitution encounters?
- 100 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- Will the FBI now hire anyone who has had encounters with prostitutes?
- No, the FBI will not automatically disqualify all applicants with past sexual encounters with prostitutes. However, individuals who engaged in prostitution within the last 10 years, three or more times overall, or while in a position of trust, will still be dismissed. The FBI maintains that criminal behaviour remains disqualifying.
- Why is the FBI changing its hiring standards?
- The FBI is reportedly relaxing recruitment standards due to personnel losses. The bureau stated the change was also made to account for circumstances where candidates may have engaged in the practice where it is legal, or to accommodate applicants who may have been victims of sexual abuse.
- What other past behaviours are no longer automatic disqualifiers?
- CBS News reported that stealing from an employer is no longer an automatic disqualifier as long as the incident occurred more than three years ago. The new standards also address past acts of bestiality or animal cruelty, stating they may still be considered if they took place before the age of 18.
Read it at the source
100 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
37- The FBI No Longer Treats the Use of Prostitutes as an Automatic Impediment to Employment. (opens fakti.bg in a new tab)
- Kash Patel's FBI Loosens Hiring Rules On Theft, Prostitution And—Wait, Bestiality? (opens Crooks and Liars in a new tab)
Crooks and Liars — is Crooks and Liars biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Lowering the Bar? FBI Drops Hiring Ban on Applicants Who Paid for Prostitutes Amid Staff Shortages (opens IBTimes UK in a new tab)
IBTimes UK — is IBTimes UK biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CBS: FBI No Longer Bars Applicants With History Of Hiring Sex Workers, Bestiality, Stealing From Employers (opens Joe.My.God. in a new tab)
Joe.My.God. — is Joe.My.God. biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Patel’s FBI Lowers the Bar for Applicants With Checkered Pasts (opens The Daily Beast in a new tab)
The Daily Beast — is The Daily Beast biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Human Trafficking and Theft now no bar to FBI employment (opens Daily Kos in a new tab)
- FBI moves away from a total ban on applicants who have had sexual encounters with prostitutes (opens Los Angeles Times in a new tab)
Los Angeles Times — is Los Angeles Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bewilderment as Kash Patel's FBI eases ban on bestiality and prostitution for recruits (opens Raw Story in a new tab)
Show 29 more
- FBI Reportedly Loosens Hiring Rules So ‘Prostitution and Bestiality’ Are No Longer ‘Automatic Disqualifiers’ (opens Mediaite in a new tab)
- FBI drops ban on hiring people who have had sexual encounters with prostitutes (opens Boing Boing in a new tab)
Boing Boing — is Boing Boing biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens haltonhillstoday.ca in a new tab)
haltonhillstoday.ca — is haltonhillstoday.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Timmins Today in a new tab)
Timmins Today — is Timmins Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens CambridgeToday.ca in a new tab)
CambridgeToday.ca — is CambridgeToday.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens ElliotLakeToday.com in a new tab)
ElliotLakeToday.com — is ElliotLakeToday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Elora Fergus Today in a new tab)
Elora Fergus Today — is Elora Fergus Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens thealbertan.com in a new tab)
thealbertan.com — is thealbertan.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Bay Today in a new tab)
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Sudbury in a new tab)
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Bowen Island Undercurrent in a new tab)
Bowen Island Undercurrent — is Bowen Island Undercurrent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Orillia Matters in a new tab)
Orillia Matters — is Orillia Matters biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Rocky Mountain Outlook in a new tab)
Rocky Mountain Outlook — is Rocky Mountain Outlook biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Bradford Today in a new tab)
Bradford Today — is Bradford Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens InnisfilToday.ca in a new tab)
InnisfilToday.ca — is InnisfilToday.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Guelph Today in a new tab)
Guelph Today — is Guelph Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Prince George Citizen in a new tab)
Prince George Citizen — is Prince George Citizen biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens SooToday.com in a new tab)
SooToday.com — is SooToday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens The Sun Chronicle in a new tab)
The Sun Chronicle — is The Sun Chronicle biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens WellandTribune.ca in a new tab)
WellandTribune.ca — is WellandTribune.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens The Record in a new tab)
The Record — is The Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens The Hamilton Spectator in a new tab)
The Hamilton Spectator — is The Hamilton Spectator biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens The Seattle Times in a new tab)
The Seattle Times — is The Seattle Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens The Independent (US) in a new tab)
The Independent (US) — is The Independent (US) biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Associated Press News in a new tab)
Associated Press News — is Associated Press News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens The Independent in a new tab)
The Independent — is The Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens ABC News in a new tab)
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's past experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens goSkagit in a new tab)
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's past experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Enid News & Eagle in a new tab)
Enid News & Eagle — is Enid News & Eagle biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
48- FBI to consider some applicants with history of prostitution under new hiring policy (opens ABC 36 News in a new tab)
ABC 36 News — is ABC 36 News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 'What is that saying about the applicant pool?' The FBI will no longer treat experience with prostitution as an automatic bar against hiring (opens Fortune in a new tab)
- What Changed in the FBI's Background Check Policy in June? (opens Attack of the Fanboy in a new tab)
Attack of the Fanboy — is Attack of the Fanboy biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI Eases Hiring Rules for Some Applicants With Past Prostitution Encounters (opens News Facts Network in a new tab)
News Facts Network — is News Facts Network biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens kctv5 in a new tab)
- FBI eases hiring ban for applicants with past prostitution encounters (opens KDFW in a new tab)
- FBI eases hiring ban for applicants with past prostitution encounters (opens Fox 9 in a new tab)
- FBI eases hiring ban for applicants with past prostitution encounters (opens FOX13news in a new tab)
Show 40 more
- FBI eases hiring ban for applicants with past prostitution encounters (opens Fox5 DC in a new tab)
- FBI eases hiring ban for applicants with past prostitution encounters (opens Fox 11 LA in a new tab)
- FBI eases hiring ban for applicants with past prostitution encounters (opens WOFL in a new tab)
- FBI eases hiring ban for applicants with past prostitution encounters (opens WFLD in a new tab)
- FBI eases hiring ban for applicants with past prostitution encounters (opens LiveNOW from FOX in a new tab)
LiveNOW from FOX — is LiveNOW from FOX biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI to consider some applicants with history of prostitution under new hiring policy (opens WTVR in a new tab)
- FBI to consider some applicants with history of prostitution under new hiring policy (opens WRTV in a new tab)
- FBI to consider some applicants with history of prostitution under new hiring policy (opens KJRH in a new tab)
- FBI to consider some applicants with history of prostitution under new hiring policy (opens KATC in a new tab)
- FBI to consider some applicants with history of prostitution under new hiring policy (opens KTVQ in a new tab)
- FBI to consider some applicants with history of prostitution under new hiring policy (opens KXLH.com in a new tab)
- FBI to consider some applicants with history of prostitution under new hiring policy (opens KTVH in a new tab)
- FBI to consider some applicants with history of prostitution under new hiring policy (opens KPAX in a new tab)
- FBI to consider some applicants with history of prostitution under new hiring policy (opens KBZK in a new tab)
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Castanet in a new tab)
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens The Northern Virginia Daily in a new tab)
The Northern Virginia Daily — is The Northern Virginia Daily biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring – WTOP News (opens Washington Top News in a new tab)
Washington Top News — is Washington Top News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens The Standard-Journal in a new tab)
The Standard-Journal — is The Standard-Journal biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens CFJC Today Kamloops in a new tab)
CFJC Today Kamloops — is CFJC Today Kamloops biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens meadowlakeNOW in a new tab)
meadowlakeNOW — is meadowlakeNOW biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Battlefords NOW in a new tab)
Battlefords NOW — is Battlefords NOW biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens My Mother Lode in a new tab)
My Mother Lode — is My Mother Lode biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Ckpg Today in a new tab)
Ckpg Today — is Ckpg Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Denver Post in a new tab)
Denver Post — is Denver Post biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens The Record in a new tab)
The Record
- Headline Unavailable (opens GazetteXtra in a new tab)
GazetteXtra — is GazetteXtra biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's past experience with prosti (opens WBAL in a new tab)
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Newsday in a new tab)
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Bozeman Daily Chronicle in a new tab)
Bozeman Daily Chronicle — is Bozeman Daily Chronicle biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Times Union in a new tab)
Times Union — is Times Union biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens WSLS in a new tab)
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Click on Detroit in a new tab)
Click on Detroit — is Click on Detroit biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens WKMG in a new tab)
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's past experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens KHQ Right Now in a new tab)
KHQ Right Now — is KHQ Right Now biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's past experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens KULR-TV in a new tab)
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's past experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Hometown News LP in a new tab)
Hometown News LP — is Hometown News LP biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's past experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Ottumwa Courier in a new tab)
Ottumwa Courier — is Ottumwa Courier biased? Our profile of this outlet
- At the FBI, a history of hiring prostitutes or stealing from employer may no longer be a barrier to being hired (opens CBS News in a new tab)
- FBI Softens Screening Rules for New Hires (opens Political Wire in a new tab)
Political Wire — is Political Wire biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
7- FBI Loosens Strict S*x Worker Rule: What New Hiring Guidance Means for Applicants (opens Latestly in a new tab)
- FBI No Longer Considers Prostitution an Automatic Veto to Hire an Applicant (opens Clarin in a new tab)
- The FBI Lifts the Ban on Recruiting Agents Who Had Connections to Prostitutes - Guardian: EADaily (opens EADaily in a new tab)
- FBI lowers hiring bar: Getting services from prostitutes, stealing from employer, bestiality not automatic deal-breakers (opens Times of India in a new tab)
Times of India — is Times of India biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI No Longer Treating an Applicant's Experience With Prostitution as Automatic Bar Against Hiring (opens The National Herald in a new tab)
The National Herald — is The National Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI Ends Automatic Hiring Bar for Experience With Prostitution (opens Newsmax in a new tab)
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Washington Times in a new tab)
Washington Times — is Washington Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
8- FBI No Longer Considers Prostitution an Automatic Veto to Hire an Applicant (opens Independent Español in a new tab)
Independent Español — is Independent Español biased? Our profile of this outlet
- ‘What is that saying about the applicant pool?’ The FBI will no longer treat experience with prostitution as an automatic bar against hiring (opens BizToc in a new tab)
- FBI Eases Automatic Hiring Ban on Applicants with Past Prostitution History (opens TownFlex in a new tab)
- FBI Schimbă Regulile De Recrutare: Din Cauza Penuriei De Angajați, Nu Mai Respinge Automat Candidații Care Au Appeal La Serviciile Prostitutelor (opens Aktual24 in a new tab)
- At the FBI, a History of Hiring Prostitutes, Bestiality may no Longer be a Barrier to Being Hired (opens Restoring Liberty in a new tab)
Restoring Liberty — is Restoring Liberty biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI drops automatic hiring ban for applicants with past prostitution encounters (opens MSNBCTV NEWS in a new tab)
MSNBCTV NEWS — is MSNBCTV NEWS biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens Loonie Politics in a new tab)
Loonie Politics — is Loonie Politics biased? Our profile of this outlet
- FBI no longer treating an applicant's experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring (opens KXL in a new tab)
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.
More in Politics
All Politics →
2 min readChrista Pike execution delay caused by official confusion, 911 calls showRead story
2 min readMike Johnson expects to remain House Republican leader if party loses majorityRead story
3 min readFederal raid on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s D.C. home linked to immigration fraud investigation nicknamed “World War Eleven”Read story