Federal Court rejects Ottawa's bid to dismiss climate case

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Federal Court rejects Ottawa's bid to dismiss climate case?

Of the 24 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 67% are rated left, 33% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 25. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.

Is Federal Court rejects Ottawa's bid to dismiss climate case left or right?

Neither side dominates it. Of the 24 rated outlets on this story, 67% are rated left, 33% are rated centre, 0% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.

Is the coverage of Federal Court rejects Ottawa's bid to dismiss climate case biased?

Federal Court rejects Ottawa's bid to dismiss climate case is one event reported by 25 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.

Which side is not reporting Federal Court rejects Ottawa's bid to dismiss climate case?

When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.

Which outlets covered Federal Court rejects Ottawa's bid to dismiss climate case?

25 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.

What was the government accused of in the lawsuit?

The lawsuit accuses the Canadian government of having no intention of meeting its 2030 greenhouse gas emission target. Environmental groups and climate activists filed the action, asking the court to order the government to comply with the Net-Zero Accountability Act or declare its plan unlawful.

What was the government's argument in court?

Government lawyers argued that the Federal Court does not have the power to order the government to take specific steps to meet its emissions targets. They sought to have the case dismissed on these grounds.

What was the judge's decision?

Justice Patrick Gleeson ruled that the government had not met the high legal threshold required to strike the application from the court. This means the lawsuit can proceed.