Government abandons plan to bypass species protection laws
Proposal would have allowed cabinet ministers to exempt projects from 'jeopardy test'.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Government abandons plan to bypass species protection laws
Photograph: Narcity (embedded from source)
What this story says
- The federal government is no longer pursuing a plan that could have eased project approvals by exempting them from laws protecting endangered species.
- Environmental groups have stated that other methods may still allow the government to bypass the Species At Risk Act.
- The government intends to introduce new legislation in the autumn aimed at expediting approvals for large-scale projects.
- A component of the original proposal involved granting cabinet ministers the authority to exempt projects from the 'jeopardy test'.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 28 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 4 of the 32 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
42/100
Craft
57/100
Hype
20/100
32 sources · methodology
Missing from the right
None of the 28 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.
The federal government has abandoned plans to create exemptions to laws that protect species at risk. The proposal would have allowed cabinet ministers to grant exemptions for certain projects from the 'jeopardy test', a key component of the Species At Risk Act. This move comes as the government prepares to introduce new legislation in the fall intended to speed up the approval process for major projects.
Despite the withdrawal of this specific proposal, environmental groups have expressed continued concern. They state that Ottawa may still find other ways to circumvent the protections offered by the Species At Risk Act. The full implications of the planned fall legislation on environmental protections remain unclear.
Coverage comparison
What the coverage left out
None of the left-rated or centre-rated digests mentioned the specific figure of 'limited' power that cabinet ministers would have had to exempt projects from the 'jeopardy test', a detail present in some reports.
Coverage settled. We checked this 62 times and stopped on 15 Sept 2026, 13:00. The figures above are what it finished at.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
21 rated outlets
- Left-rated reports focused on the government abandoning its plan to bypass protections for species at risk. These reports noted that environmental groups believe other means may still be used to circumvent the Species At Risk Act. The planned introduction of legislation in the fall to speed up project approvals was also mentioned.
Centre
7 rated outlets
- Centre-rated reports highlighted the federal government's decision to drop its proposal to exempt projects from species protection laws. They also included the view of environmental groups that other avenues for bypassing the Species At Risk Act may exist. The intention to introduce legislation in the fall to accelerate project approvals was also noted.
Right
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated right ran this story. We watched the coverage until it stopped changing, and none appeared.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Government abandons plan to bypass species protection laws?
- Of the 28 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 70% are rated left, 30% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 32. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Government abandons plan to bypass species protection laws left or right?
- The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 70% of the 28 rated outlets on it are rated left — so far this is a story carried mostly by the left. Coverage of this one has settled, so that is unlikely to move much now.
- Is the coverage of Government abandons plan to bypass species protection laws biased?
- Government abandons plan to bypass species protection laws is one event reported by 32 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Government abandons plan to bypass species protection laws?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Government abandons plan to bypass species protection laws?
- 32 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What plan has the federal government abandoned?
- The federal government has abandoned a proposal that would have allowed certain projects to be exempted from laws designed to protect species at risk. This included the possibility of ministers having the power to bypass the 'jeopardy test'.
- What are environmental groups concerned about?
- Environmental groups are concerned that even though this specific exemption plan is dropped, the government might still find other ways to bypass the Species At Risk Act. They are watching for future legislative actions that could impact environmental protections.
- What is the government planning for project approvals?
- The government plans to introduce new legislation in the fall. The stated aim of this legislation is to speed up the approval process for major projects across the country.
Read it at the source
32 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
21- Feds drop plans to skirt Species At Risk Act for major projects (opens APTN News in a new tab)
- Feds drop plans to skirt Species At Risk Act for major projects (opens The Turtle Island News in a new tab)
The Turtle Island News — is The Turtle Island News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Ottawa Will Not Circumvent the Species at Risk Act (opens Radio-Canada in a new tab)
Radio-Canada — is Radio-Canada biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Feds drop plans to skirt Species At Risk Act for major projects (opens Oakville News in a new tab)
Oakville News — is Oakville News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Feds drop plans to skirt Species At Risk Act for major projects (opens StratfordToday.ca in a new tab)
StratfordToday.ca — is StratfordToday.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Feds drop plans to skirt Species At Risk Act for major projects (opens InnisfilToday.ca in a new tab)
InnisfilToday.ca — is InnisfilToday.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Major Projects in Ottawa to Avoid Circumvention of the Species at Risk Act (opens La Presse in a new tab)
- Carney government drops plan to bypass protections for at-risk species (opens WellandTribune.ca in a new tab)
WellandTribune.ca — is WellandTribune.ca biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 13 more
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens The Toronto Star in a new tab)
The Toronto Star — is The Toronto Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Timmins Today in a new tab)
Timmins Today — is Timmins Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Collingwood Today in a new tab)
Collingwood Today — is Collingwood Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Guelph Today in a new tab)
Guelph Today — is Guelph Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Bay Today in a new tab)
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Sudbury in a new tab)
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Elora Fergus Today in a new tab)
Elora Fergus Today — is Elora Fergus Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Thorold Today in a new tab)
Thorold Today — is Thorold Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Orillia Matters in a new tab)
Orillia Matters — is Orillia Matters biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens SooToday.com in a new tab)
SooToday.com — is SooToday.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Rocky Mountain Outlook in a new tab)
Rocky Mountain Outlook — is Rocky Mountain Outlook biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens The Record in a new tab)
The Record — is The Record biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens The Hamilton Spectator in a new tab)
The Hamilton Spectator — is The Hamilton Spectator biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
7- Feds drop plans to skirt Species At Risk Act for major projects (opens CTV News in a new tab)
- Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens City News in a new tab)
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Ckpg Today in a new tab)
Ckpg Today — is Ckpg Today biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens CFJC Today Kamloops in a new tab)
CFJC Today Kamloops — is CFJC Today Kamloops biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens meadowlakeNOW in a new tab)
meadowlakeNOW — is meadowlakeNOW biased? Our profile of this outlet
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Battlefords NOW in a new tab)
Battlefords NOW — is Battlefords NOW biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Winnipeg Free Press in a new tab)
Winnipeg Free Press — is Winnipeg Free Press biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Not rated
4- Feds drop plans to skirt Species At Risk Act for major projects (opens Loonie Politics in a new tab)
Loonie Politics — is Loonie Politics biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Feds drop plans to skirt Species At Risk Act for major projects (opens Airdrie City View in a new tab)
Airdrie City View — is Airdrie City View biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Narcity in a new tab)
- CP Feds drop plans to skirt species at risk act for major projects (opens Medicine Hat News in a new tab)
Medicine Hat News — is Medicine Hat News biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


