Greens rift deepens over Steele-John conduct allegations
Senator denies allegations and claims he is not on leave, contradicting party leader
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made
Senator Jordon Steele-John at Parliament House in Canberra in 2023. Alex Ellinghausen
Photograph: WA today (embedded from source)
What this story says
- Greens leader David Shoebridge said Senator Jordon Steele-John agreed to take leave while an investigation into conduct allegations proceeds.
- Steele-John released an open letter denying allegations and stating he was not on leave, contradicting Shoebridge.
- Seven Greens members wrote to Shoebridge expressing concerns about allegations against Steele-John between 2017 and 2025.
- Steele-John stated WA Police interviewed him regarding a sexual assault complaint but denied the allegations, and the investigation was closed without charges.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .
Trust
60/100
Craft
75/100
Hype
45/100
6 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
Only 1 of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
A dispute has emerged within the Greens party regarding allegations of misconduct against Senator Jordon Steele-John. Greens leader David Shoebridge stated that Steele-John had agreed to take leave during an independent investigation into the allegations. However, Steele-John released an open letter denying the claims and asserting he was not on leave, directly contradicting Shoebridge's statement.
Disagreement over leave status
Shoebridge initially stated last Thursday that Steele-John had chosen to take leave. In response, Steele-John posted a lengthy open letter on social media on Sunday night. In this letter, he stated he was not on leave and described Shoebridge's comment as "a bad call" that would be read as validating a story where there was no substance. A spokesperson for Shoebridge later stated that the leader understood leave had been agreed and reiterated his opinion that leave was appropriate under the circumstances.
Allegations and police investigation
The investigation was initiated after seven Greens members wrote to David Shoebridge between 2017 and 2025 expressing concern over multiple allegations against Steele-John. Reports also indicated the existence of a 47-page dossier cataloguing allegations and suggesting strategies for managing media coverage. Steele-John addressed a reference in the letter to a 2025 complaint involving him and a former partner. He stated he was interviewed by WA Police regarding a complaint of sexual assault, specifically stealthing, but denied the allegations. Steele-John said the police investigation was closed without charges being laid. WA Police declined to comment on whether an investigation took place.
What the coverage left out
None of the left-rated digests mention that senior Labor Senator Don Farrell offered to mediate internal Greens issues. None of the right-rated digests mention that seven Greens members wrote to David Shoebridge expressing concern over allegations against Steele-John between 2017 and 2025, nor do they mention the existence of a 47-page dossier cataloguing allegations.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 2 times, most recently on 19 Oct 2026, 08:15, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
4 rated outlets
- Left-rated reports from The Age, Brisbane Times, and Sydney Morning Herald highlighted the deepening rift within the Greens over the allegations. The Age and Sydney Morning Herald focused on "Greens insiders" who came forward to demand public findings in the inquiry, with two of the seven signatories to the letter to David Shoebridge speaking out. Crikey's report focused on the broader issue of how parliament investigates politicians accused of misconduct, using the Steele-John allegations as a case study.
Centre
1 rated outlet
- WA Today, the centre-rated outlet, led with Greens leader David Shoebridge's insistence that Jordon Steele-John agreed to take leave during an investigation, directly contradicting the senator. This report detailed Steele-John's open letter denying allegations and his claims about the WA Police investigation into a sexual assault complaint, which he stated was closed without charges.
Right
1 rated outlet
- The right-rated report from The West Australian highlighted that senior Labor Senator Don Farrell offered to mediate internal Greens issues amid the Jordon Steele-John scandal. This digest noted Steele-John had released a statement denying allegations of inappropriate conduct.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Greens rift deepens over Steele-John conduct allegations?
- Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 67% are rated left, 16% are rated centre, 17% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Greens rift deepens over Steele-John conduct allegations left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of Greens rift deepens over Steele-John conduct allegations biased?
- Greens rift deepens over Steele-John conduct allegations is one event reported by 6 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Greens rift deepens over Steele-John conduct allegations?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Greens rift deepens over Steele-John conduct allegations?
- 6 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What are the allegations against Jordon Steele-John?
- While the specific allegations are not detailed in the reports, seven Greens members wrote to David Shoebridge expressing concern over multiple allegations against Steele-John between 2017 and 2025. Steele-John himself addressed a complaint of sexual assault (stealthing) made by a former partner, which he denied.
- Did Jordon Steele-John agree to take leave?
- Greens leader David Shoebridge stated that Steele-John agreed to take leave during an investigation into his conduct. However, Steele-John released an open letter denying this, stating he was not on leave and calling Shoebridge's comment "a bad call."
- Was there a police investigation into Steele-John?
- Steele-John stated he was interviewed by WA Police regarding a complaint of sexual assault (stealthing) but denied the allegations. He said the investigation was closed without charges. WA Police declined to comment on whether an investigation took place.
Read it at the source
6 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
4- ‘A bad call’: Greens rift deepens over Steele-John allegations (opens Brisbane Times in a new tab)
Brisbane Times — is Brisbane Times biased? Our profile of this outlet
- The Jordan Steele-John allegations and the issue with parliament investigating politicians (opens Crikey in a new tab)
Crikey — is Crikey biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Greens insiders break cover to demand public findings in Steele-John inquiry (opens The Age in a new tab)
- Greens insiders break cover to demand public findings in Steele-John inquiry (opens Sydney Morning Herald in a new tab)
Sydney Morning Herald — is Sydney Morning Herald biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
1Right
1Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

