Skip to the story
All stories

Hegseth blocked military promotions over vaccine, diversity stances

Defense Secretary's office reportedly used internet searches to vet candidates, bypassing merit-based process.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth blocked promotions for military officers who supported Covid-19 vaccines and DEI initiatives, according to a new report (Reuters)

What this story says

  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly halted promotions for at least 12 military officers based on their support for Covid-19 vaccines and diversity initiatives.
  • Hegseth's office allegedly used internet searches to compile "paper-only files" for vetting candidates, bypassing the Pentagon's standard merit-based promotion system.
  • The blocked promotions could end the careers of affected officers if they do not advance within 18 months.
  • A Pentagon spokesperson stated the department is committed to ensuring all advancement is merit-based.

Who covered it

Left 83%(5)Centre 17%(1)Right 0%(0)

Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .

Trust

60/100

Craft

65/100

Hype

45/100

6 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

None of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has reportedly blocked promotions for military officers who supported Covid-19 vaccines and diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. According to a report citing senior officials, Hegseth's office compiled "paper-only files" from internet searches to vet candidates for promotion. This process allegedly sidestepped the Pentagon's merit-based system and disproportionately affected women and people of color.

At least 12 officers reportedly had their promotions withheld. Their files flagged activities such as participation in Pride Month events, serving as diversity liaison officers, or encouraging Covid-19 vaccinations. Some flagged officers held advanced degrees and had combat experience in Iraq and Afghanistan. The blocked promotions could force officers into retirement if they do not advance within 18 months.

Disagreement on process details

MS NOW reported that Hegseth's office used internet searches to vet candidates, compiling paper-only files, according to a senior official cited by MS NOW. The Independent reported that instructions on the new criteria were relayed by phone rather than put in writing. IBTimes UK reported that the Pentagon has not publicly explained the individual decisions and that whether the Pentagon relied on other undisclosed information remains unclear.

What the coverage left out

None of the left- or centre-rated reports mentioned the specific number of officers whose promotions were blocked, beyond stating "at least 12 officers" in the verified claims. No right-rated outlet ran this story.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 9 Nov 2026, 20:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Hegseth blocked military promotions over vaccine, diversity stances
IBTimes UKLeft

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

5 rated outlets

  • The left-rated reports focused on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth blocking promotions due to officers' support for Covid-19 vaccines and diversity initiatives. The Independent and IBTimes UK highlighted that Hegseth's office allegedly used internet searches to vet candidates, compiling "paper-only files" and bypassing the merit-based promotion process. These reports noted that the actions disproportionately affected women and people of color. The Independent quoted a senior official saying, "I was like ‘you gotta be kidding me’," and cited a Pentagon spokesperson stating the department is committed to ensuring all advancement is merit-based. IBTimes UK mentioned that the controversy gained urgency after the midterm elections secured Democrats control of Congress, increasing the prospect of scrutiny. Raw Story reported that the secret files could spell legal trouble for Hegseth, with a senior official suggesting the process may have violated federal law.

Centre

1 rated outlet

  • Political Wire's digest stated that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth "short-circuited a merit-based process for promoting senior officers and instead relied on newly invented criteria that disproportionately removed from advancement." The digest did not provide further details on the specific criteria or the number of officers affected.

Right

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Hegseth blocked military promotions over vaccine, diversity stances?
Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 83% are rated left, 17% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Hegseth blocked military promotions over vaccine, diversity stances left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of Hegseth blocked military promotions over vaccine, diversity stances biased?
Hegseth blocked military promotions over vaccine, diversity stances is one event reported by 6 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Hegseth blocked military promotions over vaccine, diversity stances?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Hegseth blocked military promotions over vaccine, diversity stances?
6 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why did Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly block military promotions?
According to reports, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth blocked promotions for military officers who supported Covid-19 vaccines and diversity initiatives. His office allegedly used internet searches to vet candidates, compiling "paper-only files" that bypassed the Pentagon's merit-based promotion system.
How many officers were affected by the blocked promotions?
Verified claims state that at least 12 officers had their promotions withheld. The specific number of officers affected was not detailed in the left- or centre-rated reports provided.
What are the potential consequences for the affected officers?
The blocked promotions could end the careers of the affected officers. They may be forced into retirement if they do not advance to the rank for which they were selected within a period of 18 months.

Read it at the source

6 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Hegseth Blocks Promotions | MediaBias News