Skip to the story
All stories

Hillary Clinton calls for tougher US stance on Netanyahu

Former Secretary of State says she 'hates' Netanyahu's government and policies.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Hillary Clinton calls for tougher US stance on Netanyahu

What this story says

  • Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States should take a tougher position if Israelis re-elect Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
  • Clinton stated she 'hates' Netanyahu's government and policies, and also expressed dislike for President Donald Trump's government and policies.
  • She referenced reports that the United Arab Emirates warned Netanyahu about Hamas's plans before the Oct. 7, 2023 attack.
  • Netanyahu's office has denied that such a warning was given.

Who covered it

Left 33%(6)Centre 11%(1)Right 56%(10)

Percentages are shares of the 17 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 17 of the 34 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

70/100

Craft

87/100

Hype

22/100

34 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 6 of the 17 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has called for a more stringent American approach should Israelis re-elect Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Clinton stated that if Israelis choose to vote for Netanyahu's government again, the United States must adopt a 'very tough position'.

Clinton also expressed strong disapproval of both Netanyahu's and former President Donald Trump's governments and policies, stating, 'I love Israel and I hate Netanyahu’s government and his policies. I love America, and I hate Trump’s government and policies.' She made these remarks during an appearance on MS NOW's "Morning Joe."

Disagreement over UAE warning to Netanyahu

Clinton referenced media reports, including one in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, alleging that the United Arab Emirates warned Netanyahu about Hamas's plans before the Oct. 7, 2023 attack. Clinton suggested Netanyahu either did not believe the warning or intended to use the scenario to his advantage. Netanyahu's office has strongly rejected the report, stating that no such warning was given and that official records show no conversation between Netanyahu and the UAE president during the relevant period. Netanyahu has reportedly instructed his lawyers to file a defamation lawsuit against Haaretz and reporter Shlomi Eldar over the story, which Haaretz has stood by. An Emirati source familiar with the alleged conversation reportedly confirmed the newspaper's account to The Times of Israel, while the UAE government has declined to comment.

What the coverage left out

None of the left- or centre-rated outlets covered this story. The reports from the right-rated outlets did not mention any specific details about the upcoming Israeli general elections, such as the date or the specific parties involved, beyond referencing the possibility of Netanyahu's re-election.

Coverage settled. We checked this 48 times and stopped on 16 Sept 2026, 15:45. The figures above are what it finished at.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

Hillary Clinton calls for tougher US stance on Netanyahu
VINnewsRight

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

6 rated outlets

We have not written our reading of the left coverage of this story. The left-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.

Centre

1 rated outlet

We have not written our reading of the centre coverage of this story. The centre-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.

Right

10 rated outlets

  • Right-rated reports focused on Hillary Clinton's strong statements regarding her opposition to the governments and policies of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former US President Donald Trump. Multiple outlets highlighted her declaration, 'I love Israel and I hate Netanyahu’s government and his policies. I love America, and I hate Trump’s government and policies.' The reports also noted Clinton's call for the US to take a 'very tough position' if Netanyahu is re-elected. The Anadolu Ajansı and VINnews full reports included Clinton's reference to reports of a warning from the United Arab Emirates to Netanyahu before the Oct. 7, 2023 attack, and VINnews detailed Netanyahu's denial and planned defamation lawsuit against Haaretz over the report. The Anadolu Ajansı report also mentioned Clinton's hope for a new prime minister who would crack down on settler violence in the West Bank and her comments on the escalating situation in the West Bank and Gaza.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Hillary Clinton calls for tougher US stance on Netanyahu?
Of the 17 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 33% are rated left, 11% are rated centre, 56% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 34. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Hillary Clinton calls for tougher US stance on Netanyahu left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 17 rated outlets on this story, 33% are rated left, 11% are rated centre, 56% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Hillary Clinton calls for tougher US stance on Netanyahu biased?
Hillary Clinton calls for tougher US stance on Netanyahu is one event reported by 34 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Hillary Clinton calls for tougher US stance on Netanyahu?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Hillary Clinton calls for tougher US stance on Netanyahu?
34 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did Hillary Clinton say about the US position on Israel?
Hillary Clinton stated that the United States should adopt a 'very tough position' if Israeli voters re-elect Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. She suggested that a new Israeli government could offer opportunities for more constructive progress in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
What did Hillary Clinton say about her feelings towards the governments of Israel and the US?
Clinton expressed strong personal feelings, stating, 'I love Israel and I hate Netanyahu’s government and his policies. I love America, and I hate Trump’s government and policies.' She made these statements during an interview on MS NOW.
What is the dispute regarding a warning before the Oct. 7 attack?
Clinton referenced reports that the United Arab Emirates warned Prime Minister Netanyahu about Hamas's plans before the Oct. 7, 2023 attack. Netanyahu's office has strongly denied this, stating no such warning was given and that official records show no relevant conversation.

Read it at the source

34 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

6

Centre

1

Right

10
Show 2 more

Not rated

17
Show 9 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Clinton on Netanyahu | MediaBias News