Skip to the story
All stories

House Republicans release Jack Smith probe transcripts

Transcripts include testimony from former prosecutors and an agent regarding phone record subpoenas.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
House Republicans release Jack Smith probe transcripts

What this story says

  • House Republicans released six transcripts related to the Arctic Frost probe.
  • The transcripts contain testimony from five former prosecutors and a former DOJ watchdog agent.
  • Committee Republicans allege investigators improperly subpoenaed phone records belonging to more than a dozen GOP lawmakers.
  • A retired DOJ Inspector General Special Agent stated he was unaware that phone data he gathered belonged to members of Congress.

Who covered it

Left 0%(0)Centre 0%(0)Right 100%(16)

Percentages are shares of the 16 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 2 of the 18 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

50/100

Craft

65/100

Hype

45/100

18 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

None of the 16 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

House Republicans have released six transcripts from the investigation into former Special Counsel Jack Smith. The released documents include testimony from five former prosecutors who worked with Smith and a former Justice Department inspector general agent. These releases are part of the House Judiciary Committee's examination of the Arctic Frost probe.

Committee Republicans allege that investigators improperly subpoenaed phone records belonging to more than a dozen Republican lawmakers during the Arctic Frost investigation. They also claim that gag orders were used to prevent lawmakers from knowing that the Biden-Harris Justice Department had obtained their records.

Disagreement on agent's awareness of congressional subpoenas

Retired Justice Department Inspector General Special Agent Brian Burnett stated in his testimony that he was not aware that phone data he was gathering belonged to members of Congress. Burnett said that if he had known the subpoenas were for congressional phone data, he would have raised concerns with his supervisor. Just the News reported that Burnett stated he never once was asked to collect congressional phone data during his decades at the DOJ's watchdog and only learned he had done so for Smith's team after he retired and it was reported in the news. The New York Times Post and other outlets also reported Burnett's statement that he was unaware the data belonged to members of Congress.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated reports below mention the specific number of Republican lawmakers whose phone records were allegedly subpoenaed, beyond stating it was "more than a dozen" in the New York Times Post and other reports. Furthermore, no outlet reported on the specific content of the six released transcripts beyond the testimony of Agent Brian Burnett and the general mention of five former Smith prosecutors.

Coverage settled. We checked this 39 times and stopped on 28 Sept 2026, 11:30. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated left ran this story. We watched the coverage until it stopped changing, and none appeared.

Centre

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated centre ran this story. We watched the coverage until it stopped changing, and none appeared.

Right

16 rated outlets

  • Right-rated outlets focused on the release of the transcripts and the allegations of improper subpoenas targeting Republican lawmakers. The New York Times Post and Fox News highlighted that House Republicans released the transcripts in what they described as an "explosive Arctic Frost records fight." Just the News led with testimony from Agent Brian Burnett, stating he was "kept in dark that subpoenaed phone data belonged to Congress." News-Pravda.com's headline stated, "NEW: Jack Smith did not make an agent aware that he was gathering phone records of Congressional members." [your]NEWS and wfmd.com also reported on the release of the transcripts and the allegations concerning GOP lawmakers' phone records.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover House Republicans release Jack Smith probe transcripts?
Of the 16 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 0% are rated left, 0% are rated centre, 100% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 18. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is House Republicans release Jack Smith probe transcripts left or right?
The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 100% of the 16 rated outlets on it are rated right — so far this is a story carried mostly by the right. Coverage of this one has settled, so that is unlikely to move much now.
Is the coverage of House Republicans release Jack Smith probe transcripts biased?
House Republicans release Jack Smith probe transcripts is one event reported by 18 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting House Republicans release Jack Smith probe transcripts?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered House Republicans release Jack Smith probe transcripts?
18 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did House Republicans release?
House Republicans released six transcripts related to the Arctic Frost probe. These transcripts include testimony from five former prosecutors who worked with Special Counsel Jack Smith and a former Justice Department inspector general agent.
What allegations are being made regarding phone records?
Committee Republicans allege that investigators improperly subpoenaed phone records belonging to more than a dozen Republican lawmakers during the Arctic Frost investigation. They also claim that gag orders were used to prevent lawmakers from knowing their records were obtained.
What did former agent Brian Burnett say about the subpoenas?
Retired Justice Department Inspector General Special Agent Brian Burnett stated he was unaware that phone data he was gathering belonged to members of Congress. He indicated that he would have raised concerns with his supervisor if he had known the subpoenas were for congressional phone data.

Read it at the source

18 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Centre

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Right

16
Show 8 more

Not rated

2

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Jack Smith Probe Transcripts Released | MediaBias News