Skip to the story
All stories

ICC takes steps to shield itself from US sanctions

Court changes software and banking arrangements amid threats of punitive measures

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
ICC takes steps to shield itself from US sanctions

What this story says

  • The International Criminal Court (ICC) has taken steps to protect itself from potential US sanctions, Deputy Prosecutor Nazhat Shameem Khan stated.
  • The court has switched its software from Microsoft to openDesk and made alternative arrangements for banking and health insurance.
  • US President Donald Trump has previously criticised the ICC, calling it an 'anti-American tribunal without jurisdiction'.
  • A UN fact-finding mission had previously concluded there were reasonable grounds to believe US forces committed war crimes in Iran.

Who covered it

Left 11%(1)Centre 11%(1)Right 78%(7)

Percentages are shares of the 9 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 11 of the 20 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

57/100

Hype

41/100

20 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 1 of the 9 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

The International Criminal Court has taken measures to shield itself from potential United States sanctions, according to Deputy Prosecutor Nazhat Shameem Khan. Khan told the Financial Times that the court has worked to ensure it is protected from the impact of future sanctions. These steps include changing its office software from Microsoft to the open-source alternative openDesk and arranging for alternative banking and health insurance. The court has also been paying staff salaries months in advance to mitigate potential disruptions.

Disagreement on US sanctions preparation

Reuters reported that the Trump administration had prepared sanctions against the entire ICC. However, the verified claims provided do not include any outlet reporting that the sanctions have been officially prepared or announced, only that the ICC is preparing for potential sanctions.

What the coverage left out

None of the right-rated digests mention the UN fact-finding mission's conclusion that there were reasonable grounds to believe US forces committed war crimes in Iran. The left-rated report included this detail.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 25 Sept 2026, 16:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

1 rated outlet

  • The left-rated report from in.gr, which is a full report, led with the ICC's protective measures against US sanctions, quoting Deputy Prosecutor Nazhat Shameem Khan. It also detailed the software and banking changes. The report noted that Reuters had previously stated the Trump administration had prepared sanctions against the entire ICC. It included statements from Donald Trump at the UN, where he called the ICC an 'anti-American tribunal without jurisdiction' and urged member states to withdraw. The report also referenced a UN fact-finding mission's conclusion that there were reasonable grounds to believe US forces committed war crimes in Iran.

Centre

1 rated outlet

  • The centre-rated report from WTVB, a digest, stated that the ICC has insulated itself against potential court-wide US sanctions, quoting Deputy Prosecutor Nazhat Shameem Khan. It included Khan's statement that the court has done a lot of work to ensure it is buffered from the impacts of any potential sanctions in the future. The digest also noted that the tribunal has spent the past year changing its technology systems and making arrangements to protect its operations.

Right

7 rated outlets

  • Seven right-rated reports, all digests, focused on the ICC preparing for or being shielded against potential US sanctions. These reports quoted Deputy Prosecutor Nazhat Shameem Khan stating the court has taken steps to protect itself. Several mentioned the switch from Microsoft to openDesk software and alternative banking and insurance arrangements. One digest noted that US President Trump has had the court in his sights, calling it an 'anti-American tribunal without jurisdiction'.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover ICC takes steps to shield itself from US sanctions?
Of the 9 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 11% are rated left, 11% are rated centre, 78% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 20. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is ICC takes steps to shield itself from US sanctions left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 9 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of ICC takes steps to shield itself from US sanctions biased?
ICC takes steps to shield itself from US sanctions is one event reported by 20 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting ICC takes steps to shield itself from US sanctions?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered ICC takes steps to shield itself from US sanctions?
20 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What steps has the ICC taken to protect itself from US sanctions?
The ICC has changed its office software from Microsoft to openDesk, arranged alternative banking and health insurance, and has been paying staff salaries months in advance to mitigate potential disruptions from US sanctions.
What has Donald Trump said about the ICC?
Donald Trump has previously called the ICC an 'anti-American tribunal without jurisdiction' and urged member states to withdraw from the court, stating Washington would never allow American military personnel to face what he described as 'show trials'.
What did the UN fact-finding mission conclude regarding US forces in Iran?
A UN fact-finding mission concluded there were reasonable grounds to believe US forces committed war crimes in Iran. The mission cited two attacks in February, including one that hit a school in Minab, as constituting such crimes.

Read it at the source

20 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

1

Centre

1

Right

7

Not rated

11
Show 3 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

ICC shields itself from sanctions | MediaBias News