ICE hires had red flags despite vetting, Post reports
A data hack exposed ICE employee information, leading to a review of recent hires.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

ICE hires had red flags despite vetting, Post reports
Photograph: Daily Kos (embedded from source)
What this story says
- A hack exposed data for approximately 1,500 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) employees.
- The Washington Post investigated about 300 of these agents and found at least 19 recruits with red flags in their past.
- Examples include former police officers involved in fatal shootings or unable to explain constitutional rights.
- The Department of Homeland Security stated that ICE follows vetting rules and some recruits may start while background checks are pending.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 6 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. Coverage measured .
Trust
70/100
Craft
70/100
Hype
45/100
6 sources · methodology
Thin on the right so far
None of the 6 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.
Information concerning approximately 1,500 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) employees was exposed through a data hack. The Washington Post conducted an investigation into about 300 of these exposed agents. Their review found that at least 19 recruits had concerning issues in their past.
Among the individuals reviewed was JeJuan Jetter, a former Detroit police officer. Jetter was involved in a fatal shooting of a teenager that resulted in a $2.5 million settlement. The Washington Post reported that Jetter had other past issues, including being placed on leave for using a Taser on a handcuffed person and for using profane language. He was also found to have intentionally turned off his in-car camera at a scene.
Another former police officer who became an ICE agent, Joseph Joffrion, was reportedly unable to explain the Fourth Amendment during a deposition. The Department of Homeland Security stated that ICE adheres to required vetting procedures. They also noted that some recruits may begin their roles under temporary status while their background investigations are ongoing.
Disagreement on vetting processes
The Department of Homeland Security stated that ICE follows required vetting rules and that some recruits may begin under temporary status while background investigations are pending, according to News Facts Network. The Washington Post reported that some immigration officers were quickly hired last year despite past misconduct or criminality.
What the coverage left out
None of the left-rated or centre-rated reports mentioned the total number of ICE employees hired during the expansion, which DHS stated was roughly 12,000. The reports also did not detail the specific nature of the misconduct or criminal histories for the majority of the 19 recruits identified by The Washington Post, beyond the examples of JeJuan Jetter and Joseph Joffrion.
Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 11 Nov 2026, 17:30, and will add the sides that appear.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
5 rated outlets
- Left-rated reports focused on the exposure of ICE agents with concerning pasts following a data hack. Daily Kos highlighted the "violent histories" of ICE agents and suggested that loosened requirements during a "rapid hiring spree" led to the hiring of individuals with "alarming pasts." Joe.My.God. and Raw Story also emphasised the criminal backgrounds and "bad list of conduct" found among ICE recruits, citing The Washington Post's findings. Arkansas Times used the headline "Any goon can be an ICE agent, Arkansas edition," suggesting a lack of stringent hiring standards. The Washington Post's own report, also rated left, led with the finding that "at least 19 ICE recruits named in DHS hack were hired despite red flags."
Centre
1 rated outlet
- The centre-rated report from News Facts Network led with the finding that ICE hired "at least 19 officers with significant misconduct, criminal or employment red flags during its rapid expansion under President Donald Trump." This report also included the Department of Homeland Security's defence of its vetting process, stating that ICE follows required rules and that some recruits may start while background checks are pending.
Right
0 rated outlets
No outlet rated right has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover ICE hires had red flags despite vetting, Post reports?
- Of the 6 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 83% are rated left, 17% are rated centre, 0% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is ICE hires had red flags despite vetting, Post reports left or right?
- Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 6 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
- Is the coverage of ICE hires had red flags despite vetting, Post reports biased?
- ICE hires had red flags despite vetting, Post reports is one event reported by 6 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting ICE hires had red flags despite vetting, Post reports?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered ICE hires had red flags despite vetting, Post reports?
- 6 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- What happened after the ICE data hack?
- A hack exposed information on approximately 1,500 Immigration and Customs Enforcement employees. The Washington Post investigated about 300 of these agents and found at least 19 recruits with concerning pasts, including involvement in fatal shootings and inability to explain constitutional rights.
- How did the Department of Homeland Security respond?
- The Department of Homeland Security stated that ICE follows required vetting rules. They also noted that some recruits may begin their roles under temporary status while their background investigations are ongoing, suggesting a process for managing candidates with pending checks.
- What examples of problematic hires were cited?
- One cited example is JeJuan Jetter, a former Detroit police officer involved in a fatal shooting that led to a $2.5 million settlement. Another is Joseph Joffrion, a former police officer-turned-ICE agent who was unable to explain the Fourth Amendment during a deposition.
Read it at the source
6 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
5- Any goon can be an ICE agent, Arkansas edition (opens Arkansas Times in a new tab)
Arkansas Times — is Arkansas Times biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Homeland Security hack exposes ICE agents’ violent histories (opens Daily Kos in a new tab)
- Hack Exposes ICE Recruits With Criminal Backgrounds (opens Joe.My.God. in a new tab)
Joe.My.God. — is Joe.My.God. biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Leaked roster of ICE hires reveals ‘bad list of conduct’ and criminal charges: report (opens Raw Story in a new tab)
- At least 19 ICE recruits named in DHS hack were hired despite red flags (opens The Washington Post in a new tab)
The Washington Post — is The Washington Post biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
1Right
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
Not rated
0No outlet in this group ran the story.
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


