Skip to the story
All stories

ICE officer shot man in Austin, lawyer says agents 'sideswiped' car

An asylum seeker reported paralysis after being shot by an ICE officer who was not wearing a body camera.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
ICE officer shot man in Austin, lawyer says agents 'sideswiped' car

What this story says

  • An ICE officer shot Venezuelan national Wilber Rafael Garcés Pérez in Austin, Texas.
  • Pérez's attorney stated agents 'sideswiped' his car before firing shots and that there was not a foot chase.
  • Pérez had entered the U.S. legally as an asylum-seeker in 2024 and had a valid work permit.
  • The ICE officer involved in the shooting was reportedly a new recruit and was not wearing a body camera.

Who covered it

Left 30%(14)Centre 44%(21)Right 26%(12)

Percentages are shares of the 47 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 19 of the 66 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

60/100

Craft

61/100

Hype

20/100

66 sources · methodology

Missing from the right

Only 12 of the 47 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

An Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer shot Wilber Rafael Garcés Pérez in Austin, Texas. Pérez, who had entered the U.S. legally as an asylum-seeker in 2024 and possessed a valid work permit, reported paralysis on the left side of his body following the incident. According to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials, agents attempted to pull Pérez over after checking his license plate and discovering an outstanding deportation order.

Disagreement on the incident's initiation

Pérez's attorney, Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch, stated that agents in unmarked vehicles "sideswiped" his car before firing shots inside the vehicle. She also stated there was not a foot chase. DHS officials, however, claim agents attempted to pull Pérez over and detain him before he drove away and guns were drawn.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated digests mention the claim by Pérez's attorney that agents "sideswiped" his car before firing shots. The right-rated digest does not mention that Pérez had entered the U.S. legally as an asylum-seeker in 2024 and had a valid work permit, nor does it mention his reported paralysis.

Coverage settled. We checked this 8 times and stopped on 28 Sept 2026, 16:00. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

14 rated outlets

  • Left-rated outlets reported that the ICE officer who shot Wilber Rafael Garcés Pérez was a new recruit and not wearing a body camera. Multiple reports stated the officer had been issued a camera but did not have it active during the incident.
  • These reports included details from the man's attorney, who said ICE agents "sideswiped" his client's car before the shooting. The attorney also stated there was no foot chase and that Pérez did not know he was dealing with ICE until he was shot.
  • Reports noted that Pérez entered the U.S. legally as an asylum-seeker and had a work permit. Some outlets mentioned that ICE had emailed officers a reminder about activating body cameras following the incident.

Centre

21 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated report from CBS News stated that sources familiar with the investigation told them the ICE officer who shot a Venezuelan delivery driver was not wearing a body camera at the time of the shooting.

Right

12 rated outlets

  • The right-rated report from Anadolu Ajansı stated that the U.S. immigration agency officer who shot a Venezuelan man in Texas did not use a body camera. The report cited the Washington Post, which reported that the officer had been issued a camera but was not recording during the shooting.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover ICE officer shot man in Austin, lawyer says agents 'sideswiped' car?
Of the 47 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 30% are rated left, 44% are rated centre, 26% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 66. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is ICE officer shot man in Austin, lawyer says agents 'sideswiped' car left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 47 rated outlets on this story, 30% are rated left, 44% are rated centre, 26% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of ICE officer shot man in Austin, lawyer says agents 'sideswiped' car biased?
ICE officer shot man in Austin, lawyer says agents 'sideswiped' car is one event reported by 66 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting ICE officer shot man in Austin, lawyer says agents 'sideswiped' car?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered ICE officer shot man in Austin, lawyer says agents 'sideswiped' car?
66 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Who was shot by the ICE officer in Austin?
Wilber Rafael Garcés Pérez, a Venezuelan national, was shot by an ICE officer in Austin, Texas. His attorney stated that he had entered the U.S. legally as an asylum-seeker in 2024 and possessed a valid work permit.
What did the attorney for Wilber Rafael Garcés Pérez say about the incident?
Pérez's attorney, Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch, stated that agents "sideswiped" his car before firing shots and that there was not a foot chase. She also reported that Pérez had paralysis on the left side of his body following the shooting.
Was the ICE officer wearing a body camera during the shooting?
Reports indicate that the ICE officer involved in the shooting was not wearing a body camera at the time of the incident. The officer was reportedly a new recruit, and while issued a camera, it was not recording.
What reason did DHS officials give for attempting to pull over Pérez?
DHS officials claim that agents attempted to pull Pérez over after checking his license plate and discovering an outstanding deportation order. They stated that agents tried to detain him before he drove away and guns were drawn.

Read it at the source

66 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

14
Show 6 more

Centre

21
Show 13 more

Right

12
Show 4 more

Not rated

19
Show 11 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

ICE Shooting in Austin | MediaBias News