Skip to the story
All stories

India MEA calls BRICS leaders' illness reports fake

Ministry of External Affairs debunks social media claims of world leaders falling sick after summit

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
India MEA calls BRICS leaders' illness reports fake

What this story says

  • India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has denied reports claiming world leaders fell ill after the BRICS Summit.
  • The MEA described these social media claims as 'fake' and 'malicious' in a post on X.
  • South African President Cyril Ramaphosa's office confirmed he withdrew from public engagements due to ill health after returning from the summit.
  • Unverified reports also suggested Chinese President Xi Jinping left the summit early for medical reasons.

Who covered it

Left 0%(0)Centre 29%(2)Right 71%(5)

Percentages are shares of the 7 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 2 of the 9 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

60/100

Craft

65/100

Hype

40/100

9 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

None of the 7 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has rejected reports circulating on social media that world leaders fell ill after attending the BRICS Summit in New Delhi. The ministry's fact-checking unit posted on X, calling the claims 'fake' and 'malicious'.

These statements followed confirmation from the office of South African President Cyril Ramaphosa that he had withdrawn from public engagements due to ill health after returning from the summit. Unverified reports also claimed Chinese President Xi Jinping had departed the summit early for medical reasons.

Coverage disagreement

While the Ministry of External Affairs stated it cautioned against 'malicious' posts on social media platforms, Latestly reported that South African President Cyril Ramaphosa's office confirmed his illness post-summit, while claims regarding Chinese President Xi Jinping were unverified. The MEA issued a 'fake alert' regarding these posts.

What the coverage left out

None of the centre or right-rated reports mentioned that South African Deputy President Paul Mashatile was also recovering from a minor medical procedure, leaving both of South Africa's top leaders away from public engagements. This detail was present in the full reports from Live Mint and Hindustan Times.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 17 Sept 2026, 07:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

0 rated outlets

No outlet rated left has run this story so far. We are still checking, and will say plainly if that does not change.

Centre

2 rated outlets

  • The two centre-rated reports, Live Mint and Hindustan Times, both led with the Ministry of External Affairs debunking reports of world leaders falling ill after the BRICS Summit and calling the claims 'fake'. Both reports detailed the MEA's post on X cautioning against 'malicious' social media posts. They also both reported that South African President Cyril Ramaphosa's office confirmed he had withdrawn from public engagements due to ill health after returning from the summit. Both also mentioned unverified reports about Chinese President Xi Jinping leaving the summit early for medical reasons. Hindustan Times also included details about the BRICS Summit's declaration and condemnation of unilateral trade measures.

Right

5 rated outlets

  • The five right-rated reports, Times of India, Latestly, vz.ru, Tribune India, and Moneycontrol, all highlighted that the MEA rejected claims of leaders falling sick after the BRICS Summit. Times of India and Tribune India used the phrase 'Fake alert' in their headlines, as did Latestly and Mathrubhumi (unrated). Latestly noted that while South African President Cyril Ramaphosa's office confirmed his illness, claims about Xi Jinping were unverified. Vz.ru reported that the Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs denied social media rumours and recorded its rebuttal on X to combat 'fairies', transmitting TASS. Moneycontrol mentioned the MEA's comments came amid reports of Ramaphosa's withdrawal from public engagements.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover India MEA calls BRICS leaders' illness reports fake?
Of the 7 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 0% are rated left, 29% are rated centre, 71% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 9. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is India MEA calls BRICS leaders' illness reports fake left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 7 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of India MEA calls BRICS leaders' illness reports fake biased?
India MEA calls BRICS leaders' illness reports fake is one event reported by 9 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting India MEA calls BRICS leaders' illness reports fake?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered India MEA calls BRICS leaders' illness reports fake?
9 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did India's Ministry of External Affairs say about reports of world leaders falling ill?
India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has dismissed reports claiming world leaders fell ill after attending the BRICS Summit in New Delhi. The MEA's fact-checking unit labelled these social media claims as 'fake' and 'malicious' in a post on X.
Were any world leaders confirmed to be ill after the BRICS Summit?
Yes, the office of South African President Cyril Ramaphosa confirmed he had withdrawn from public engagements due to ill health after returning from the BRICS Summit. Reports also circulated claiming Chinese President Xi Jinping left the summit early for medical reasons, but these were unverified.
Which outlets reported on the MEA's debunking of the illness claims?
Reports on the MEA debunking the claims were published by Live Mint, Hindustan Times, Times of India, Latestly, vz.ru, Tribune India, madhyamam.com, Mathrubhumi, and Moneycontrol.

Read it at the source

9 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

0

No outlet in this group ran the story.

Centre

2

Right

5

Not rated

2

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

India MEA on BRICS leaders' health | MediaBias News