Skip to the story
All stories

Iran rejects US talks until conditions met, says security chief

Mohsen Rezaei stated that the balance of power has shifted, ruling out negotiations with Washington.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated
Iran rejects US talks until conditions met, says security chief

What this story says

  • Iran will not enter into negotiations with the United States until its conditions are met, according to Mohsen Rezaei, Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council.
  • Rezaei's statement was a response to US President Donald Trump's remarks indicating openness to dialogue.
  • The Iranian official stated that the balance of power concerning oil and strategic waterways has shifted.
  • Iranian officials have previously outlined conditions for renewed talks, including the lifting of sanctions and the unblocking of assets.

Who covered it

Left 18%(2)Centre 9%(1)Right 73%(8)

Percentages are shares of the 11 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 23 of the 34 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

57/100

Hype

41/100

34 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 2 of the 11 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Mohsen Rezaei, Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, announced that Iran will not engage in negotiations with the United States until its conditions are satisfied. This declaration came in response to statements made by US President Donald Trump, who had expressed openness to dialogue. Rezaei also asserted that the balance of power concerning oil and strategic straits has changed.

Divergent claims about the balance of power

While Mohsen Rezaei stated that the balance of power regarding oil and the straits has changed, Breitbart reported that Iran's security chief warned Trump that "the strategic balance around the region’s critical waterways has changed." Cumhuriyet also reported Rezaei stating, "The balance of power regarding oil and the straits has changed." A Haber reported Rezaei stating that "the balance of power regarding oil and the straits has shifted."

What the coverage left out

None of the reports printed below mention the specific conditions Iran has previously stated for renewed negotiations, such as the lifting of sanctions and the unblocking of assets, except for Cumhuriyet. No centre-rated outlets covered this story.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 5 times, most recently on 15 Sept 2026, 09:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

2 rated outlets

  • Cumhuriyet led with Iran's response to Trump's call for negotiations, stating "No Talks Unless Conditions Are Met." The report detailed Rezaei's statement that the balance of power regarding oil and the straits has changed, and that "approaching what is coming will not be enough to stop it." It also mentioned previous Iranian conditions for renewed negotiations, including lifting sanctions and unblocking assets.

Centre

1 rated outlet

We have not written our reading of the centre coverage of this story. The centre-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.

Right

8 rated outlets

  • Right-rated reports focused on Iran's refusal to negotiate until its conditions are met. Breitbart's headline stated, "Iran Security Chief Warns Trump: ‘The Straits Have Changed’, ‘Damage Control Won’t Stop What’s Coming.’" Mehr News Agency reported that Iran's security chief dismissed mixed signals from Washington, stating no negotiations would occur until Iran's conditions were realised. Iefimerida reported Iran ruling out negotiations until its conditions are met and adopting a tougher stance. Arutz Sheva noted the Iranian security chief rejecting Trump's mixed signals on talks. News-pravda.com highlighted Rezaei calling Trump's statements about talks "contradictory."

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Iran rejects US talks until conditions met, says security chief?
Of the 11 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 18% are rated left, 9% are rated centre, 73% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 34. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Iran rejects US talks until conditions met, says security chief left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 11 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of Iran rejects US talks until conditions met, says security chief biased?
Iran rejects US talks until conditions met, says security chief is one event reported by 34 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Iran rejects US talks until conditions met, says security chief?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Iran rejects US talks until conditions met, says security chief?
34 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is Iran's stance on negotiating with the US?
Iran's Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei has stated that there will be no negotiations with the United States until Iran's conditions are met. This position was communicated in response to US President Donald Trump's expressed openness to dialogue.
Has the balance of power in the region changed, according to Iran?
Yes, Mohsen Rezaei stated that the balance of power regarding oil and strategic waterways has changed. This assertion suggests a shift in regional dynamics that Iran considers significant in its approach to international relations and potential negotiations.
What conditions has Iran previously set for negotiations?
While not detailed in all reports, previous Iranian conditions for renewed negotiations have included the lifting of sanctions, the unblocking of assets, and the cessation of attacks on Lebanon and Gaza. These were mentioned by Cumhuriyet.

Read it at the source

34 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

2

Centre

1

Right

8

Not rated

23
Show 15 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Iran-US talks conditional | MediaBias News