Skip to the story
All stories

J.D. Vance calls selling White House access 'disgusting'

US Vice President Vance stated that those who sell access should face consequences.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
J.D. Vance calls selling White House access 'disgusting'

What this story says

  • US Vice President J.D. Vance described selling access to the White House as "disgusting and despicable."
  • Vance stated that individuals involved in selling access should face consequences.
  • The comments were made in response to allegations concerning Kimberly Guilfoyle.
  • These allegations reportedly led to Guilfoyle's removal as US ambassador to Greece.

Who covered it

Left 11%(1)Centre 22%(2)Right 67%(6)

Percentages are shares of the 9 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 22 of the 31 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

62/100

Craft

77/100

Hype

15/100

31 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 1 of the 9 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

US Vice President J.D. Vance has publicly stated that selling access to the White House is "disgusting and despicable." He added that those found to be selling such access should face consequences. Vance's remarks were made in reaction to reports concerning Kimberly Guilfoyle. These reports allege that Guilfoyle requested a $100,000 wire transfer, which subsequently led to her removal from her position as US ambassador to Greece.

Differing accounts of Vance's stance

While Vance condemned the practice of selling access, some reports indicate he preferred to base his opinion on facts rather than random reports. The Press Project noted that Vance "refrained from directly endorsing the allegations, saying he prefers to judge based on the facts." In contrast, other digests stated Vance warned of consequences if allegations were confirmed, or that he announced consequences for those who trade access to the White House.

Coverage by outlet

proson.gr reported that J.D. Vance said anyone who sells access to the US government should face consequences. ethnos.gr stated the US Vice President warned of consequences if allegations are confirmed. Periodista.gr reported that the American vice president is publicly addressing the allegations for the first time, speaking about consequences in cases of political influence peddling. THE BEST reported Vance saying he wants to form an opinion based on facts, not random reports. albeu.com reported Vance calling the sale of access "disgusting" and "despicable" and stating it should have consequences. dimokratia.gr reported the US vice president announced consequences for those who trade access to the White House. The Press Project reported Vance strongly condemning the practice and saying he prefers to judge based on facts, while also noting the allegations involving Guilfoyle requesting a $100,000 wire transfer that led to her dismissal as US Ambassador to Greece. Newsit.gr reported Vance calling it "disgusting and despicable" if someone sells access and that they will suffer the consequences. onlarissa.gr reported Vance expressing strong displeasure and calling the practice "disgusting" and "despicable," stating they should suffer the consequences.

What the coverage left out

None of the digests mention Donald Trump's stated position on the matter, specifically his claim that he has not contacted Guilfoyle and his downplaying of their earlier personal relationship, as reported by Periodista.gr. Furthermore, the digests do not include any discussion of a possible presidential pardon, which Periodista.gr mentioned Trump avoided answering about.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 2 times, most recently on 16 Oct 2026, 08:15, and will add the sides that appear.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover J.D. Vance calls selling White House access 'disgusting'?
Of the 9 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 11% are rated left, 22% are rated centre, 67% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 31. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is J.D. Vance calls selling White House access 'disgusting' left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 9 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of J.D. Vance calls selling White House access 'disgusting' biased?
J.D. Vance calls selling White House access 'disgusting' is one event reported by 31 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting J.D. Vance calls selling White House access 'disgusting'?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered J.D. Vance calls selling White House access 'disgusting'?
31 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did J.D. Vance say about selling access to the White House?
US Vice President J.D. Vance described the practice of selling access to the White House as "disgusting and despicable." He also stated that individuals involved in such activities should face consequences for their actions.
What allegations are linked to Kimberly Guilfoyle?
Allegations suggest that Kimberly Guilfoyle requested a $100,000 wire transfer from an individual seeking assistance from the Trump administration. These reports are understood to have led to her removal from her role as US ambassador to Greece.
Did J.D. Vance directly confirm the allegations against Guilfoyle?
While J.D. Vance condemned the practice of selling White House access, some reports indicate he preferred to judge the specific allegations based on facts rather than random reports. He did not directly endorse the claims but stated that those involved should face consequences.

Read it at the source

31 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

1

Centre

2

Right

6

Not rated

22
Show 14 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

J.D. Vance on White House access | MediaBias News