Skip to the story
All stories

Judge overturns Trump-era Education Department anti-DEI grant policy

A federal judge nullified a policy from the early Trump administration that forced the Education Department to end millions in diversity, equity and inclusion grant funding, as reported by Reuters.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published Updated

What this story says

  • A federal judge struck down the Education Department's anti‑DEI grant policy.
  • The policy was adopted early in President Donald Trump's administration.
  • The rule would have forced termination of millions of dollars in DEI grant funding.
  • Reuters reported the decision on 17 September 2026.

Who covered it

Left 26%(11)Centre 46%(20)Right 28%(12)

Percentages are shares of the 43 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 3 of the 46 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

30/100

Craft

59/100

Hype

15/100

46 sources · methodology

Missing from the left

Only 11 of the 43 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

A reader who follows the left would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.

On 17 September 2026 a federal judge issued a ruling that nullified a policy requiring the US Department of Education to end grant funding for diversity, equity and inclusion programmes. The policy had been adopted early in the administration of President Donald Trump.

The judge's order therefore restores the eligibility of the grants that the policy would have terminated, affecting millions of dollars that had been slated for removal. Reuters first reported the decision on Thursday.

What the left did not cover

No left‑rated outlet ran this story, so none reported the judge's ruling or the details of the policy.

Coverage settled. We checked this 10 times and stopped on 23 Sept 2026, 08:30. The figures above are what it finished at.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

11 rated outlets

  • NBC News, the Seattle Times, the Orlando Sentinel, the Niagara Gazette, the Goshen News and the Sun Chronicle all led on a federal judge overturning a 2025 Trump administration order that eliminated hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher‑training grants. Each digest notes the amount as either “hundreds of millions” or roughly $600 million.
  • The New Republic, the Daily Star and Goshen News each described the Education Department rule as an “arbitrary” anti‑DEI directive, with the Daily Star adding that the order violated federal law. Courthouse News Service reported the administration could not define diversity, equity and inclusion, and Joe.My.God. highlighted the department’s claim the cuts targeted “divisive ideologies.”
  • None of the left‑rated digests name the presiding judge, specify the court’s jurisdiction, or quote any Education Department representative. They also omit any discussion of the administration’s legal defence or of potential impacts on teachers beyond the funding loss.

Centre

20 rated outlets

  • The three centre‑rated outlets, KFGO, WTVB and Reuters, each reported that a federal judge struck down the anti‑DEI grant policy, noted that the rule was adopted early in the Trump administration, and explained that it would have required termination of millions of dollars in grants.

Right

12 rated outlets

  • The two right‑rated outlets, WKZO and Regional Media News, likewise led on the judge's decision, the Trump‑era origin of the policy and the fact that it called for ending millions of dollars in DEI grant funding.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Judge overturns Trump-era Education Department anti-DEI grant policy?
Of the 43 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 26% are rated left, 46% are rated centre, 28% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 46. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Judge overturns Trump-era Education Department anti-DEI grant policy left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 43 rated outlets on this story, 26% are rated left, 46% are rated centre, 28% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Judge overturns Trump-era Education Department anti-DEI grant policy biased?
Judge overturns Trump-era Education Department anti-DEI grant policy is one event reported by 46 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Judge overturns Trump-era Education Department anti-DEI grant policy?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Judge overturns Trump-era Education Department anti-DEI grant policy?
46 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did the federal judge decide?
The judge nullified a policy that required the Education Department to terminate millions of dollars in grants for diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, effectively restoring those grants. The ruling was issued on 17 September 2026.
When was the decision first reported?
Reuters first reported the judge's decision on Thursday, 17 September 2026, noting the policy's origin in the early Trump administration and its impact on DEI grant funding.
Which outlets covered the story?
The story appeared in centre‑rated outlets KFGO, WTVB and Reuters, and right‑rated outlets WKZO and Regional Media News. No left‑rated outlet published a report on the decision.

Read it at the source

46 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

11
Show 3 more

Centre

20
Show 12 more

Right

12
Show 4 more

Not rated

3

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Judge Overturns Trump-Era Education Policy | MediaBias News