Skip to the story
All stories

Justice Department Faces Scrutiny After Democratic Election Gains

The department operated for nearly two years without congressional oversight, prompting expected investigations.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
A banner with a portrait of President Donald Trump is seen hung outside the Department of Justice, Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2026. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

What this story says

  • The Justice Department operated for nearly two years as an extension of the White House without oversight from a Republican-controlled Congress.
  • Sweeping Democratic gains in Congress are expected to lead to investigations into the Justice Department's past actions.
  • Attorney General Todd Blanche has stated the department will cooperate with Congress but will not abandon the president's agenda.
  • A top aide advised prosecutors to prepare for a 'wartime' footing in anticipation of congressional scrutiny.

Who covered it

Left 45%(22)Centre 45%(22)Right 10%(5)

Percentages are shares of the 49 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 5 of the 54 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

57/100

Hype

41/100

54 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

Only 5 of the 49 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

The Justice Department operated for almost two years as an extension of the White House, without checks from a Republican-controlled Congress. During this period, the department pursued investigations into President Donald Trump’s perceived enemies, dismissed numerous career employees, and defended administration positions that courts frequently found legally questionable. With Democrats now holding a majority in Congress, a shift in power is anticipated, leading to expected investigations into the department's conduct.

Attorney General Todd Blanche has indicated that the department will cooperate with congressional inquiries. However, he also stated that the department will not deviate from President Trump's agenda. A top aide reportedly instructed prosecutors to prepare for a 'wartime' footing in anticipation of the increased scrutiny. This sets the stage for potential conflict as Democrats aim to review the department's actions.

Disagreements in Reporting

The provided reports do not present any factual disagreements among the outlets regarding the events described.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated, centre-rated, or right-rated digests mention the specific details about the Justice Department pursuing investigations into figures like Cassidy Hutchinson, Ilhan Omar, James Comey, or ex-FBI officials, nor do they include the warning letter sent by U.S. Attorney Aaron Reitz to Senator Richard Blumenthal.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 3 times, most recently on 15 Nov 2026, 11:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

22 rated outlets

  • Left-rated reports highlighted that the Justice Department functioned for nearly two years as an extension of the White House, unchecked by a Republican-controlled Congress. These reports noted the department pursued investigations into President Donald Trump’s enemies, fired career employees, and defended administration stances. The shift in power due to Democratic gains in Congress and the resulting expected investigations were also prominent. Some left-rated digests mentioned the statement from Attorney General Todd Blanche about cooperating with Congress but not backing down from the president's agenda, and the advice for prosecutors to prepare for a 'wartime' footing.

Centre

22 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated reports focused on the Justice Department's operation for nearly two years as an extension of the White House, without oversight from a Republican-controlled Congress. They noted the department's investigations into President Donald Trump’s enemies and the dismissal of career employees. The shift in power following Democratic election gains and the subsequent expectation of congressional investigations were also central. Some centre-rated digests included Attorney General Todd Blanche's statement about cooperation and resistance to backing down, as well as the 'wartime' footing advice for prosecutors.

Right

5 rated outlets

  • Right-rated reports highlighted that the Justice Department functioned for nearly two years as an extension of the White House, unchecked by a Republican-controlled Congress. These reports also mentioned the department's pursuit of investigations into President Donald Trump’s enemies and the firing of career employees. The shift in power due to Democratic gains in Congress and the resulting expected investigations were also noted.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Justice Department Faces Scrutiny After Democratic Election Gains?
Of the 49 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 45% are rated left, 45% are rated centre, 10% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 54. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Justice Department Faces Scrutiny After Democratic Election Gains left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 49 rated outlets on this story, 45% are rated left, 45% are rated centre, 10% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Justice Department Faces Scrutiny After Democratic Election Gains biased?
Justice Department Faces Scrutiny After Democratic Election Gains is one event reported by 54 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Justice Department Faces Scrutiny After Democratic Election Gains?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Justice Department Faces Scrutiny After Democratic Election Gains?
54 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
How long did the Justice Department operate without congressional oversight?
The Justice Department operated for nearly two years as an extension of the White House without being checked by a Republican-controlled Congress. This period preceded the recent Democratic gains in Congress, which are expected to usher in a new era of scrutiny.
What is the Justice Department's stance on upcoming congressional investigations?
Attorney General Todd Blanche has stated that the Justice Department will cooperate with Congress. However, he also affirmed that the department will not back down from President Trump's agenda and will continue to pursue its priorities.
What does 'wartime footing' mean for prosecutors?
A top aide advised prosecutors to prepare for a 'wartime' footing. While one report suggested this reference was related to public safety and potential lack of cooperation from new state and local leaders, it signals an anticipation of intense scrutiny and potential conflict.

Read it at the source

54 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

22
Show 14 more

Centre

22
Show 14 more

Right

5

Not rated

5

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Justice Department Scrutiny | MediaBias News