Skip to the story
All stories

Justice Department reviews Watergate prosecutor conduct

Review follows presentation by former Nixon aide arguing "deep state" conspiracy

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Justice Department reviews Watergate prosecutor conduct

What this story says

  • The Justice Department is reviewing whether the special prosecutor's office that investigated Watergate committed misconduct.
  • The review was prompted by a presentation from Geoff Shepard, a former Nixon aide and historian, who argued the "deep state" took Nixon down.
  • A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed Shepard's presentation took place.
  • The review is preliminary, and it is unclear if it will lead to a full investigation.

Who covered it

Left 60%(6)Centre 20%(2)Right 20%(2)

Percentages are shares of the 10 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 1 of the 11 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

61/100

Hype

41/100

11 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

Only 2 of the 10 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

The Justice Department is undertaking a preliminary review to determine if the special prosecutor's office involved in the Watergate investigation acted improperly. This review was initiated after Geoff Shepard, a former aide to President Richard Nixon and a historian, presented his theory that "deep state" actors were responsible for Nixon's downfall. A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed that Shepard's presentation occurred at the department's headquarters.

Disagreement on the nature of the review

The Wall Street Journal reported that the review is preliminary and it is unclear if it will lead to a full-fledged probe. MS Now, in its full report, also stated the review is preliminary and its outcome uncertain.

What the coverage left out

None of the left-rated digests mention the specific title of Geoff Shepard's presentation, "Watergate As Lawfare," which was included in MS Now's full report. None of the centre-rated digests or the right-rated digest mention the specific title of Shepard's presentation.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 1 Oct 2026, 22:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

6 rated outlets

  • Six left-rated reports focused on the Justice Department's review of the Watergate investigation. MS Now, in its full report, described the review as "outrageous" and "hyper-politicized," adding "insult to injury" to the targeting of prosecutors who investigated President Trump. The outlet also highlighted JD Vance's argument that the "deep state" tried to do to Donald Trump what it did to Richard Nixon, calling Vance's pitch "bonkers" and "shockingly ahistorical." Esquire stated the DOJ was "trying to recast Richard Nixon as the Victim of Watergate" instead of doing anything valuable. Alternet reported the DOJ was on a "new mission to clear Nixon’s name." Joe.My.God. and Lawyers, Guns & Money also framed the review as an attempt to absolve Nixon, with Joe.My.God. using the headline "WSJ: DOJ Is Working To Absolve Nixon For Watergate." Mediaite reported that Rep. Riley Moore (R-WV) claimed Nixon was "framed" and "couped out of office" over a "fake" scandal.

Centre

2 rated outlets

  • Two centre-rated reports highlighted the Justice Department's review. Political Wire and the Wall Street Journal both reported that the department is considering whether prosecutors mistreated Richard Nixon. The Wall Street Journal's digest noted that a "revisionist historian went to DOJ headquarters to present his case that former president, his associates weren’t treated fairly."

Right

2 rated outlets

  • The single right-rated report, National Review, focused on the idea that the review is unnecessary. Its headline stated, "No, We Don’t Need to Spend Taxpayer Dollars to Review Whether Nixon Got a Raw Deal," and its digest noted the issue was "resolved in 1974, and historians have been arguing about it for two generations."

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Justice Department reviews Watergate prosecutor conduct?
Of the 10 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 60% are rated left, 20% are rated centre, 20% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 11. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Justice Department reviews Watergate prosecutor conduct left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 10 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of Justice Department reviews Watergate prosecutor conduct biased?
Justice Department reviews Watergate prosecutor conduct is one event reported by 11 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Justice Department reviews Watergate prosecutor conduct?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Justice Department reviews Watergate prosecutor conduct?
11 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What is the Justice Department reviewing regarding Watergate?
The Justice Department is conducting a preliminary review to assess whether the special prosecutor's office that investigated the Watergate scandal committed misconduct. This review was prompted by a presentation from a former Nixon aide.
Who presented the theory that led to the review?
The theory was presented by Geoff Shepard, a former Nixon aide and historian. He argued that the "deep state" was responsible for orchestrating Richard Nixon's downfall during the Watergate scandal.
Has the Justice Department confirmed the presentation took place?
Yes, a Justice Department spokesperson confirmed that Geoff Shepard's presentation occurred at the department's headquarters. However, the spokesperson also indicated that the review is preliminary and it remains unclear if it will lead to a full investigation.

Read it at the source

11 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

6

Centre

2

Right

2

Not rated

1

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Watergate Prosecutor Review | MediaBias News