Lawmakers urge Supreme Court to block USPS mail-in voting rule
More than 250 current and former members of Congress filed a brief arguing the rule infringes on Congress's election authority.
AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Clerk Matthew Sandbar demonstrates part of the ballot sorting process to members of the media attending a walkthrough of the Philadelphia Ballot Processing Center for the midterm elections on October 27, 2022.
Photograph: Common Dreams (embedded from source)
What this story says
- More than 250 current and former members of Congress submitted an amicus brief to the US Supreme Court.
- The brief argues a USPS rule on mail-in voting and a related executive order unconstitutionally infringe on Congress's authority.
- Lawmakers are urging the Supreme Court to deny a request to pause a judge's ruling that blocks parts of the USPS rule.
- The filing was submitted shortly before a deadline for new filings and as the Department of Justice argued against blocking the rule.
Who covered it
Percentages are shares of the 51 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 7 of the 58 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .
Trust
42/100
Craft
60/100
Hype
20/100
58 sources · methodology
Missing from the right
Only 5 of the 51 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.
A reader who follows the right would not have seen this. We report the absence rather than explain it: outlets choose what to cover for many reasons, and we have no evidence about which one applies here.
More than 250 current and former members of the US Congress have filed a brief with the Supreme Court. The filing argues that a United States Postal Service rule concerning mail-in voting, along with a related executive order, unconstitutionally oversteps Congress's authority in federal elections. The lawmakers are asking the Supreme Court to reject a request to temporarily halt a lower court's decision that blocks parts of the USPS rule.
The brief was submitted just before a deadline for new filings. It comes as the Department of Justice is arguing in a lower court against a preliminary injunction that is preventing the USPS rule from being enforced. The lawmakers contend that the executive order and the USPS rule unlawfully direct federal agencies to act beyond their authorized powers and in conflict with congressional law.
Disagreement on the rule's impact
The filing states that the USPS rule "unconstitutionally imposes mail-ballot requirements on the states, and that the final rule unconstitutionally bars noncompliant state and local election officials from using USPS to mail ballots at all." The Department of Justice, however, argued to a lower court that the policy is "modest" and lawful, according to Common Dreams.
What the coverage left out
None of the left-rated digests mention the Department of Justice's argument that the USPS rule is "modest" and lawful. The unrated digests also do not include this detail. The full report from Common Dreams mentions this argument in the context of the DOJ fighting a preliminary injunction.
Coverage settled. We checked this 56 times and stopped on 14 Sept 2026, 16:45. The figures above are what it finished at.
How each side covered it
Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.
Left
40 rated outlets
- Reports from left-rated outlets focused on the number of lawmakers involved, identifying them as current and former members of Congress. These reports highlighted the argument that the USPS rule and President Trump's executive order unconstitutionally infringe on Congress's authority over federal elections. The filings were described as urging the Supreme Court to block Trump's "attack on mail voting" or a "constitutional power grab." Several reports quoted Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who stated that Trump was "asking the highest court in the land to silence voters and destroy the precious integrity of the American electoral process." Senator Alex Padilla was also quoted, saying, "The law is clear: States and Congress have authority over our elections, not the president and certainly not the Postal Service."
Centre
6 rated outlets
We have not written our reading of the centre coverage of this story. The centre-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.
Right
5 rated outlets
We have not written our reading of the right coverage of this story. The right-rated outlets that ran it are listed below.
Questions about this coverage
- How did the left and right cover Lawmakers urge Supreme Court to block USPS mail-in voting rule?
- Of the 51 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 78% are rated left, 14% are rated centre, 8% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 58. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
- Is Lawmakers urge Supreme Court to block USPS mail-in voting rule left or right?
- The story itself is neither. What can be counted is who has covered it, and 78% of the 51 rated outlets on it are rated left — so far this is a story carried mostly by the left. Coverage of this one has settled, so that is unlikely to move much now.
- Is the coverage of Lawmakers urge Supreme Court to block USPS mail-in voting rule biased?
- Lawmakers urge Supreme Court to block USPS mail-in voting rule is one event reported by 58 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
- Which side is not reporting Lawmakers urge Supreme Court to block USPS mail-in voting rule?
- When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
- Which outlets covered Lawmakers urge Supreme Court to block USPS mail-in voting rule?
- 58 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
- How many lawmakers filed a brief with the Supreme Court?
- More than 250 current and former members of Congress submitted an amicus brief to the US Supreme Court. The brief argues that a USPS rule on mail-in voting and a related executive order unconstitutionally infringe on Congress's authority over federal elections.
- What is the main argument of the lawmakers' brief?
- The lawmakers argue that the USPS rule and President Trump's executive order unconstitutionally infringe on Congress's authority over federal elections. They are urging the Supreme Court to deny a request to pause a judge's ruling that blocks parts of the USPS rule.
- Did any centre or right-rated outlets cover this story?
- No centre or right-rated outlets covered this story among the reports provided. All 19 outlets that ran the story were rated as left-leaning or unrated.
Read it at the source
58 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.
Left
40- Top Georgia Republican asks Supreme Court to reject Trump election scheme (opens Alternet in a new tab)
- Raffensperger urges Supreme Court to reject Trump’s mail-in ballot plan (opens AJC in a new tab)
- Donald Trump Accused of 'Unconstitutional' Election Power Grab in Supreme Court Showdown (opens OK! Magazine in a new tab)
OK! Magazine — is OK! Magazine biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Florida Phoenix in a new tab)
Florida Phoenix — is Florida Phoenix biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Ohio Capital Journal in a new tab)
Ohio Capital Journal — is Ohio Capital Journal biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens tiffinohio.net in a new tab)
tiffinohio.net — is tiffinohio.net biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Alaska Beacon in a new tab)
Alaska Beacon — is Alaska Beacon biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court • Oklahoma Voice (opens oklahomavoice.com in a new tab)
oklahomavoice.com — is oklahomavoice.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
Show 32 more
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court • West Virginia Watch (opens westvirginiawatch.com in a new tab)
westvirginiawatch.com — is westvirginiawatch.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court • SC Daily Gazette (opens scdailygazette.com in a new tab)
scdailygazette.com — is scdailygazette.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump plan would bar millions of Americans from voting by mail, states tell Supreme Court (opens Nevada Current in a new tab)
Nevada Current — is Nevada Current biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Michigan Advance in a new tab)
Michigan Advance — is Michigan Advance biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Missouri Independent in a new tab)
Missouri Independent — is Missouri Independent biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Tennessee Lookout in a new tab)
Tennessee Lookout — is Tennessee Lookout biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Pennsylvania Capital-Star in a new tab)
Pennsylvania Capital-Star — is Pennsylvania Capital-Star biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Idaho Capital Sun in a new tab)
Idaho Capital Sun — is Idaho Capital Sun biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens arkansasadvocate.com in a new tab)
arkansasadvocate.com — is arkansasadvocate.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Iowa Capital Dispatch in a new tab)
Iowa Capital Dispatch — is Iowa Capital Dispatch biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Nebraska Examiner in a new tab)
Nebraska Examiner — is Nebraska Examiner biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens South Dakota Searchlight in a new tab)
South Dakota Searchlight — is South Dakota Searchlight biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Georgia Recorder in a new tab)
Georgia Recorder — is Georgia Recorder biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Kansas Reflector in a new tab)
Kansas Reflector — is Kansas Reflector biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Colorado Newsline in a new tab)
Colorado Newsline — is Colorado Newsline biased? Our profile of this outlet
- 250+ Current, Former Lawmakers Urge Supreme Court to Block Trump Attack on Mail Voting (opens Common Dreams in a new tab)
Common Dreams — is Common Dreams biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Oregon Capital Chronicle in a new tab)
Oregon Capital Chronicle — is Oregon Capital Chronicle biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Daily Montanan in a new tab)
Daily Montanan — is Daily Montanan biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Louisiana Illuminator in a new tab)
Louisiana Illuminator — is Louisiana Illuminator biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens mainemorningstar.com in a new tab)
mainemorningstar.com — is mainemorningstar.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- A Bipartisan Group Of Nearly 300 Current And Former Members Of Congress Urge SCOTUS To Block Trump’s Mail-In Voting Attack (opens Politicus USA in a new tab)
Politicus USA — is Politicus USA biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Virginia Mercury in a new tab)
Virginia Mercury — is Virginia Mercury biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Arizona Mirror in a new tab)
Arizona Mirror — is Arizona Mirror biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Utah News Dispatch in a new tab)
Utah News Dispatch — is Utah News Dispatch biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Source New Mexico in a new tab)
Source New Mexico — is Source New Mexico biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court • Rhode Island Current (opens rhodeislandcurrent.com in a new tab)
rhodeislandcurrent.com — is rhodeislandcurrent.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens New Hampshire Bulletin in a new tab)
New Hampshire Bulletin — is New Hampshire Bulletin biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Bob Bauer: “Eleventh-Hour Executive Branch Interventions in the Midterms” (opens electionlawblog.org in a new tab)
electionlawblog.org — is electionlawblog.org biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Wisconsin Examiner in a new tab)
Wisconsin Examiner — is Wisconsin Examiner biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court • Washington State Standard (opens washingtonstatestandard.com in a new tab)
washingtonstatestandard.com — is washingtonstatestandard.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Minnesota Reformer in a new tab)
Minnesota Reformer — is Minnesota Reformer biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Maryland Matters in a new tab)
Maryland Matters — is Maryland Matters biased? Our profile of this outlet
Centre
6- States, civic groups urge Supreme Court to leave order in place prohibiting Trump administration from implementing parts of mail-in ballot rule (opens SCOTUSblog in a new tab)
SCOTUSblog — is SCOTUSblog biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Emergency Supreme Court filing warns mail ballot rules could create Georgia chaos (opens WAGA in a new tab)
- Ryan and over 250 others ask Supreme Court to block Trump mail-voting limits (opens Daily Freeman in a new tab)
Daily Freeman — is Daily Freeman biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Post Register in a new tab)
Post Register — is Post Register biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Nisqually Valley News in a new tab)
Nisqually Valley News — is Nisqually Valley News biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump Accused of 'Unconstitutional' Election Power Grab as Members of Congress Urge Supreme Court to Block New Mail-Ballot Crackdown (opens RadarOnline in a new tab)
RadarOnline — is RadarOnline biased? Our profile of this outlet
Right
5- Port: ND secretary of state among officials asking Supreme Court to block Trump's mail ballot order (opens The Dickinson Press in a new tab)
The Dickinson Press — is The Dickinson Press biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Port: ND secretary of state among officials asking Supreme Court to block Trump's mail ballot order (opens Jamestown Sun in a new tab)
Jamestown Sun — is Jamestown Sun biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Port: ND secretary of state among officials asking Supreme Court to block Trump's mail ballot order (opens Grand Forks Herald in a new tab)
Grand Forks Herald — is Grand Forks Herald biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- Port: ND secretary of state among officials asking Supreme Court to block Trump's mail ballot order (opens Inforum in a new tab)
Inforum — is Inforum biased? Our profile of this outletOpinion
- General election season is here. Where does mail-in voting stand? (opens Washington Examiner in a new tab)
Washington Examiner — is Washington Examiner biased? Our profile of this outlet
Not rated
7- States warn of ‘chaos’ if Supreme Court allows mail-ballot restrictions for midterms (opens BizToc in a new tab)
- Trump Doesn’t Have the Power to Limit Mail-In Voting, Lawmakers Tell US Supreme Court (opens Royal Examiner in a new tab)
Royal Examiner — is Royal Examiner biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Cobb County Courier in a new tab)
Cobb County Courier — is Cobb County Courier biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Trump doesn’t have the power to limit mail-in voting, lawmakers tell US Supreme Court (opens Dailyfly in a new tab)
- Markey Joins Padilla, Schumer, All Senate Democrats to Urge Supreme Court to Block Postal Service Rule Limiting Mail-In Voting (opens statehousenews.com in a new tab)
statehousenews.com — is statehousenews.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Massachusetts Sen. Markey Warns of Constitutional Power Grab, Will Fight Trump’s Mail-Ballot Order at the Supreme Court (opens New Bedford Guide in a new tab)
New Bedford Guide — is New Bedford Guide biased? Our profile of this outlet
- Padilla, Schumer Lead All Senate Democrats to Urge Supreme Court to Block Postal Service Rule Limiting Mail-In Voting (opens randomlengthsnews.com in a new tab)
randomlengthsnews.com — is randomlengthsnews.com biased? Our profile of this outlet
How did this read?
About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.


