Skip to the story
All stories

Massimo Galli acquitted on appeal of false charges

Court of Appeal of Milan declares 'the fact does not exist' regarding the charge against the infectivologist.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Massimo Galli acquitted on appeal of false charges

What this story says

  • Massimo Galli and Agostino Riva were acquitted on appeal of the charge of false.
  • The Court of Appeal of Milan stated 'the fact does not exist' regarding the charge.
  • Galli had previously received a one-year, four-month suspended sentence in the first instance.
  • The case concerned alleged rigged competitions at the University of Milan's Faculty of Medicine.

Who covered it

Left 57%(4)Centre 29%(2)Right 14%(1)

Percentages are shares of the 7 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 12 of the 19 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

60/100

Hype

20/100

19 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

Only 1 of the 7 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Infectivologist Massimo Galli and his former collaborator Agostino Riva have been acquitted on appeal of the charge of false. The Court of Appeal of Milan declared that 'the fact does not exist' in relation to the charge. Galli had previously been sentenced to one year and four months, with a suspended sentence and no mention on his record, in the first instance. The case involved allegations of rigged competitions at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Milan.

Disagreement on first instance verdict

Il Fatto Quotidiano reported that the appeal decision cancelled the sentence of one year and four months, with a suspended sentence and no mention, that had been imposed in the first instance. The other reports do not detail the specifics of the first instance verdict beyond stating a sentence was given.

What the coverage left out

None of the reports mention the specific details of the alleged rigged competitions or the names of any other individuals involved in the case beyond Galli and Riva. The digests do not provide information on the specific nature of the 'false' charge beyond it relating to a verbale (minutes) with an unrectified time.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 1 time, most recently on 9 Nov 2026, 18:15, and will add the sides that appear.

How other outlets pictured it

Which photograph to run is each newsroom’s own choice. The leaning beside a name is that outlet’s published rating, not a claim that the pictures divide along it. Every picture is shown from the outlet’s own server and links to the article it ran in.

- RIPRODUZIONE RISERVATA
ANSACentre

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

4 rated outlets

  • The left-rated reports led with the acquittal of Massimo Galli and Agostino Riva. Il Fatto Quotidiano and La Stampa highlighted that the charge of false was also dismissed. Il Fatto Quotidiano included a quote from Galli stating that the five years of the judicial process were 'useless suffering' and that the matter was 'entirely non-existent'. La Repubblica also noted the cancellation of the remaining conviction for false.

Centre

2 rated outlets

  • The centre-rated reports focused on the definitive acquittal of Massimo Galli. ANSA stated that the judges cancelled the residual charge of false. Corriere Della Sera reported that the judges declared 'the fact does not exist' and that the accusation of false regarding timetables had fallen.

Right

1 rated outlet

  • The right-rated report from il Giornale stated that Massimo Galli was completely acquitted and that all charges were dropped. It noted that the judges of the Court of Appeal also cancelled the forgery charge, declaring 'the fact does not exist'.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Massimo Galli acquitted on appeal of false charges?
Of the 7 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 57% are rated left, 29% are rated centre, 14% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 19. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Massimo Galli acquitted on appeal of false charges left or right?
Too few of the outlets on this story carry a published leaning rating to say. 7 of them do, and this site does not characterise a field under 12: at that size one newsroom filing moves the share by ten points. The percentages above are the count as it stands.
Is the coverage of Massimo Galli acquitted on appeal of false charges biased?
Massimo Galli acquitted on appeal of false charges is one event reported by 19 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Massimo Galli acquitted on appeal of false charges?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Massimo Galli acquitted on appeal of false charges?
19 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What was Massimo Galli acquitted of on appeal?
Massimo Galli and his former collaborator Agostino Riva were acquitted on appeal of the charge of false. The Court of Appeal of Milan declared that 'the fact does not exist' regarding this charge, overturning a previous conviction.
What was the original charge against Massimo Galli?
Massimo Galli was previously sentenced in the first instance to one year and four months, with a suspended sentence and no mention on his record, for the charge of false. This related to alleged rigged competitions at the University of Milan's Faculty of Medicine.
What did Massimo Galli say about the trial?
Massimo Galli stated that the five years of the judicial process were 'useless suffering' and that the matter was 'entirely non-existent'. He expressed relief at the acquittal, calling it a great weight lifted from his stomach.

Read it at the source

19 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

4

Centre

2

Right

1

Not rated

12
Show 4 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Massimo Galli acquitted | MediaBias News