Skip to the story
All stories

Michigan reviewing Line 5 tunnel permits after court ruling

Governor urges Enbridge CEO to shut down pipeline within months.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Michigan reviewing Line 5 tunnel permits after court ruling

What this story says

  • Michigan environmental regulators are reviewing permits for the Line 5 tunnel project.
  • The review follows a Michigan Supreme Court decision that vacated a separate tunnel permit.
  • Governor Gretchen Whitmer has asked Enbridge CEO Gregory Ebel to shut down the Line 5 pipeline within months.
  • Environmentalists and Native American tribes support the renewed scrutiny, while unions and business groups oppose it.

Who covered it

Left 58%(14)Centre 38%(9)Right 4%(1)

Percentages are shares of the 24 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 3 of the 27 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

50/100

Craft

65/100

Hype

45/100

27 sources · methodology

Thin on the right so far

Only 1 of the 24 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated right.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Michigan environmental regulators are reviewing permits for the Line 5 tunnel project. This action comes after a Michigan Supreme Court decision vacated a separate tunnel permit, stating the commission had not adequately considered environmental impacts or alternatives. Governor Gretchen Whitmer announced the review in a press release on Wednesday. She also sent a letter to Enbridge CEO Gregory Ebel urging him to shut down the Line 5 pipeline within months.

Environmentalists and Native American tribes have expressed support for the renewed scrutiny and the governor's call for a shutdown, viewing it as a win for the Great Lakes. Conversely, unions and business groups that support the tunnel project have criticised the move. Enbridge spokesperson Ryan Duffy stated the company is prepared to discuss protecting natural resources while ensuring energy infrastructure.

Disagreement on permit status

Washington Top News reported that the permits granted by the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy (EGLE) do not allow construction to proceed until legal questions are resolved. The Detroit Free Press also stated that construction cannot move forward until legal questions are resolved, according to EGLE Director Phil Roos. However, The Midwesterner reported that the permits approved in July need further review, and the Detroit News stated the administration is reconsidering a permit.

What the coverage left out

None of the left, centre, or right-rated digests mention the specific environmental impacts or alternatives that the Michigan Supreme Court cited in its ruling. The digests also do not include the specific wording of the Michigan Supreme Court's decision.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 7 times, most recently on 10 Sept 2026, 23:30, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

14 rated outlets

  • Left-rated reports focused on Governor Whitmer's call to shut down the Line 5 pipeline and the state's review of tunnel permits following the Michigan Supreme Court ruling. These reports highlighted Whitmer's characterisation of the pipeline as a "ticking time bomb" and her statement that Enbridge's argument for the status quo is "untenable." The digests noted that environmentalists and Native American tribes supported the renewed scrutiny and shutdown push. Some reports mentioned that construction cannot proceed until legal questions are resolved, citing EGLE Director Phil Roos. The Detroit Free Press digest noted that the shift comes as Wisconsin grapples with a Line 5 spill.

Centre

9 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated reports highlighted that Michigan environmental regulators are reviewing permits for the Line 5 tunnel project in light of the Michigan Supreme Court decision. They also noted Governor Whitmer's urging of Enbridge CEO Gregory Ebel to shut down the pipeline within months. The Detroit News digest stated the Whitmer administration is reconsidering a permit for the tunnel.

Right

1 rated outlet

  • The right-rated digest from The Midwesterner focused on the "confusion" surrounding the Gretchen Whitmer administration "rethinking" Line 5 permit approvals. It stated that the administration is reversing course after state regulators approved the permits in July and that the permits need further review.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Michigan reviewing Line 5 tunnel permits after court ruling?
Of the 24 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 58% are rated left, 38% are rated centre, 4% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 27. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Michigan reviewing Line 5 tunnel permits after court ruling left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 24 rated outlets on this story, 58% are rated left, 38% are rated centre, 4% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Michigan reviewing Line 5 tunnel permits after court ruling biased?
Michigan reviewing Line 5 tunnel permits after court ruling is one event reported by 27 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Michigan reviewing Line 5 tunnel permits after court ruling?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated right had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Michigan reviewing Line 5 tunnel permits after court ruling?
27 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
Why are Michigan regulators reviewing Line 5 tunnel permits?
Michigan environmental regulators are reviewing permits for the Line 5 tunnel project following a decision by the Michigan Supreme Court. The court vacated a separate tunnel permit, ruling that the commission had not adequately considered environmental impacts or alternatives.
What is Governor Whitmer asking Enbridge to do?
Governor Gretchen Whitmer has urged Enbridge CEO Gregory Ebel to shut down the Line 5 pipeline within months. She questioned whether the tunnel will ever be built and stated that it is untenable for the company to continue pumping oil through the Straits.
Who supports and opposes the renewed scrutiny of the Line 5 permits?
Environmentalists and Native American tribes support the renewed scrutiny and the governor's call for a shutdown. Unions and business groups that support the tunnel project have criticised the move.

Read it at the source

27 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

14
Show 6 more

Centre

9
Show 1 more

Right

1

Not rated

3

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Line 5 Tunnel Review | MediaBias News