Skip to the story
All stories

Netanyahu to sue Haaretz over claim of UAE warning before Oct 7

Israeli PM denies report that he was alerted to Hamas operation, calling it a 'lie'.

AI-assisted coverage comparison, editor-supervised · How this was made

Published
Israelerne skal til valg den 27. oktober og spørgsmålet om detaljerne omkring terrorangrebet den 7. oktober 2023 er blusset op igen. (Foto: © Ronen Zvulun, AFP/Ritzau Scanpix)

What this story says

  • Haaretz reported that UAE President Mohamed bin Zayed warned Benjamin Netanyahu of a planned Hamas operation before October 7, 2023.
  • Netanyahu's office has denied the report, stating no such conversation took place and calling the report a 'lie'.
  • Netanyahu has announced his intention to sue Haaretz and the journalist behind the report for defamation.
  • The Haaretz report is based on anonymous sources and comes in the context of upcoming Israeli elections.

Who covered it

Left 17%(7)Centre 17%(7)Right 66%(27)

Percentages are shares of the 41 outlets carrying a published leaning rating. 68 of the 109 outlets we know ran this story carry no rating and are not counted in them. Coverage measured .

Trust

42/100

Craft

59/100

Hype

41/100

109 sources · methodology

Thin on the left so far

Only 7 of the 41 outlets with a published leaning rating that ran this story are rated left.

This story is still being watched, so it is a count and not yet a finding. Coverage keeps arriving for hours after an event, and a side that has published nothing this morning may publish by tonight. If it is still true when we stop checking, we will say so plainly.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu intends to sue the newspaper Haaretz over a report alleging he received a warning from UAE President Mohamed bin Zayed about a planned Hamas operation prior to the October 7, 2023 attacks. Netanyahu's office has denied the report, labelling it a 'lie' and stating that no such conversation occurred.

Disagreement on the warning

Haaretz reported that Mohamed bin Zayed warned Netanyahu of a larger Hamas operation, stating that the UAE president expressed concern about destabilising the region and undermining the Abraham Accords. Netanyahu's office has denied this, with the Prime Minister stating on X that the report was a 'malicious fabrication' and part of a political campaign. The Haaretz report is based on anonymous sources.

What the coverage left out

None of the left, centre, or right-rated reports printed below mention any specific cost estimate related to the events or potential legal action. The full reports from DR and ANSA do not contain such figures.

Still developing. We have re-checked which outlets are covering this 6 times, most recently on 9 Sept 2026, 15:00, and will add the sides that appear.

How each side covered it

Our own reading of the reporting listed below, written from the outlets’ articles rather than quoted from them. The reasoning is set out on our methodology page.

Left

7 rated outlets

  • Left-rated reports focused on the core claim of Haaretz, that UAE President Mohamed bin Zayed warned Benjamin Netanyahu of a planned Hamas operation before October 7, 2023. These reports highlighted Netanyahu's denial and his subsequent announcement of a defamation lawsuit against Haaretz and the journalist. Several left-rated reports also mentioned the context of upcoming Israeli elections and Netanyahu's accusations of political timing behind the report.

Centre

7 rated outlets

  • Centre-rated reports also led with the Haaretz claim that Benjamin Netanyahu was warned by the UAE president about a Hamas attack before October 7, 2023. They noted Netanyahu's strong denial and his intention to sue Haaretz for defamation. Some centre-rated reports included details from the Haaretz investigation, such as the report being based on anonymous sources and the potential political implications given the upcoming Israeli elections. The ANSA report also detailed the alleged content of the conversation and the context of stalled negotiations for a truce.

Right

27 rated outlets

  • Right-rated reports focused on Benjamin Netanyahu's denial of the Haaretz report and his decision to sue the newspaper. Headlines and initial reporting highlighted Netanyahu's characterisation of the story as a 'malicious fabrication' and a 'lie'. These reports also mentioned the context of the upcoming Israeli elections, with some suggesting the report was timed for political purposes. The Jewish Chronicle noted that the report claimed Netanyahu failed to brief security officials.

Questions about this coverage

How did the left and right cover Netanyahu to sue Haaretz over claim of UAE warning before Oct 7?
Of the 41 outlets on this story carrying a published leaning rating, 17% are rated left, 17% are rated centre, 66% are rated right. Those percentages are shares of the rated outlets, not of every outlet that ran it, which was 109. The sections above set out what each side emphasised, in its own terms.
Is Netanyahu to sue Haaretz over claim of UAE warning before Oct 7 left or right?
Neither side dominates it. Of the 41 rated outlets on this story, 17% are rated left, 17% are rated centre, 66% are rated right, and no side holds the 70% this site would want before calling a field one-sided. A story is not left or right in any case; the outlets that carried it are what carry ratings.
Is the coverage of Netanyahu to sue Haaretz over claim of UAE warning before Oct 7 biased?
Netanyahu to sue Haaretz over claim of UAE warning before Oct 7 is one event reported by 109 outlets, and this page does not rate the story as biased or unbiased. What it publishes is the spread: which outlets ran it, where named rating organisations place each of them on the spectrum, and what each side chose to lead with. A leaning rating describes an outlet's record over time, not this article, and the two should not be run together.
Which side is not reporting Netanyahu to sue Haaretz over claim of UAE warning before Oct 7?
When we first saw this story, outlets rated left had barely covered it. Coverage accretes for hours after an event, so that is where to look rather than a verdict — the split above is the current count, and it is the one to read.
Which outlets covered Netanyahu to sue Haaretz over claim of UAE warning before Oct 7?
109 that we know of, every one of them listed further up this page with a link to its own report and to what we hold on the publisher. Nothing here is a summary of somebody else's summary: the outlets are named so the original reporting can be read.
What did Haaretz report about a warning before October 7?
Haaretz reported that UAE President Mohamed bin Zayed warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of a planned Hamas operation before the October 7, 2023 attacks. The report, based on anonymous sources, suggested the warning was not heeded.
How did Benjamin Netanyahu respond to the Haaretz report?
Benjamin Netanyahu's office denied the report, calling it a 'lie' and a 'malicious fabrication'. The Prime Minister announced his intention to sue Haaretz and the journalist behind the report for defamation, suggesting a political motive for the timing of the story.
What is the context for this story?
The Haaretz report and Netanyahu's response are being reported in the context of upcoming Israeli elections. The denial and the threat of legal action are part of the ongoing political debate surrounding the events of October 7, 2023.

Read it at the source

109 outlets, grouped by the leaning a published rating gives them. Every headline links to the original; an underlined outlet name opens our profile of that publisher.

Left

7

Centre

7

Right

27
Show 19 more

Not rated

68
Show 60 more

How did this read?

About the coverage, not about the story. We do not ask whether you agree with what happened — we have no honest use for that answer.

Netanyahu vs Haaretz | MediaBias News